Concept Mapping in Simulation within Nursing Education: A Scoping Review Protocol

被引:2
|
作者
Innis, Jennifer [1 ]
Johnston, Sarah [1 ]
Cambly, Erica [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Lawrence S Bloomberg Fac Nursing, 155 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5T 1P8, Canada
关键词
concept mapping; nursing education; simulation; concept formation; scoping review; CRITICAL THINKING; PRACTICE(TM); STANDARDS;
D O I
10.3390/nursrep13010011
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Simulation has been found to enhance nursing student knowledge and confidence, as well as to improve clinical performance. The use of concept maps during simulation has been found to play a key role in student learning. There is a need to understand what is known to date about the use of concept mapping in simulation within nursing education. This will help determine the most effective ways to use concept mapping in simulation to foster learning in nursing students. Scoping review question: What is known about the context, processes, and outcomes of concept mapping in simulation within nursing education? Methods: The scoping review will be conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for scoping reviews and will search the following databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycMED, EMBASE, and ERIC. This review will consider studies that explore the use of concept mapping in simulation within undergraduate nursing education and will include studies that have used qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods, as well as literature reviews. Editorials, commentaries, and gray literature will be excluded. Studies published from 1992 onward will be included. The data extracted will include details about the participants, how concept mapping was used within simulation, methods, key findings, and research gaps.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 113
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Concept Mapping in Simulation Within Nursing Education: A Scoping Literature Review
    Innis, Jennifer
    Johnston, Sarah
    Cambly, Erica
    TEACHING AND LEARNING IN NURSING, 2024, 19 (03) : e518 - e525
  • [2] Capability as a concept in advanced practice nursing and education: a scoping review protocol
    Whitfield, Martha M.
    Bleah, Paulina
    Bachynski, Jovina Concepcion
    Macdonald, Danielle
    Klein, Tracy
    Ross-White, Amanda
    Wilson, Rosemary
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (08) : 2079 - 2086
  • [3] Simulation in disaster nursing education: A scoping review
    Geng, Cong
    Luo, Yiqing
    Pei, Xianbo
    Chen, Xiaoli
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2021, 107
  • [4] Nursing Professional Self-Concept: A Scoping Review Protocol
    Almeida, Ines Franco
    Bernardes, Rafael Alves
    Sousa, Liliana Baptista
    Santos-Costa, Paulo
    Silva, Rosa
    Bernardo, Joana
    Santana, Elaine
    Rosa, Amorim
    NURSING REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01) : 51 - 56
  • [5] Capability as a concept in advanced practice nursing and education: a scoping review
    Whitfield, Martha M.
    Bleah, Paulina
    Concepcion Bachynski, Jovina
    Macdonald, Danielle
    Klein, Tracy
    Ross-White, Amanda
    Mimirinis, Mike
    Wilson, Rosemary
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2024, 22 (09) : 1789 - 1849
  • [6] Digital textbooks for undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review protocol
    Jang, Aeri
    Park, Hyunyoung
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (07): : 1 - 4
  • [7] Entrustable professional activities in nursing education: a scoping review protocol
    Alexander, Nicholas
    Maaz, Asja
    Peters, Harm
    Kottner, Jan
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [8] Research on simulation in radiography education: a scoping review protocol
    Mona Vestbøstad
    Klas Karlgren
    Nina Rydland Olsen
    Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [9] Research on simulation in radiography education: a scoping review protocol
    Vestbostad, Mona
    Karlgren, Klas
    Olsen, Nina Rydland
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [10] A scoping review of interprofessional education within Canadian nursing literature
    Grant, Rachel Elizabeth
    Goldman, Joanne
    LeGrow, Karen
    MacMillan, Kathleen M.
    van Soeren, Mary
    Kitto, Simon
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2016, 30 (05) : 620 - 626