A machine learning model to predict therapeutic inertia in type 2 diabetes using electronic health record data

被引:1
|
作者
Mcdaniel, C. C. [1 ]
Lo-Ciganic, W. -h. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Huang, J. [2 ]
Chou, C. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Harrison Coll Pharm, Dept Hlth Outcomes Res & Policy, 4306 Walker Bldg, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Outcomes & Policy, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Pharmaceut Policy & Prescribing, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Geriatr Res Educ & Clin Ctr, North Florida South Georgia Vet Hlth Syst, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Type; 2; diabetes; Machine learning; Prescribing behaviors; Social determinants of health; Therapeutic inertia; Treatment intensification; A1C GOAL ATTAINMENT; CLINICAL INERTIA; TREATMENT INTENSIFICATION; POPULATION; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s40618-023-02259-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To estimate the therapeutic inertia prevalence for patients with type 2 diabetes, develop and validate a machine learning model predicting therapeutic inertia, and determine the added predictive value of area-level social determinants of health (SDOH).Methods This prognostic study with a retrospective cohort design used OneFlorida data (linked electronic health records (EHRs) from 1240 practices/clinics in Florida). The study cohort included adults (aged >= 18) with type 2 diabetes, HbA1C >= 7% (53 mmol/mol), >= one ambulatory visit, and >= one antihyperglycemic medication prescribed (excluded patients prescribed insulin before HbA1C). The outcome was therapeutic inertia, defined as absence of treatment intensification within six months after HbA1C >= 7% (53 mmol/mol). The predictors were patient, provider, and healthcare system factors. Machine learning methods included gradient boosting machines (GBM), random forests (RF), elastic net (EN), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). The DeLong test compared the discriminative ability (represented by C-statistics) between models.Results The cohort included 31,087 patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age = 58.89 (SD = 13.27) years, 50.50% male, 58.89% White). The therapeutic inertia prevalence was 39.80% among the 68,445 records. GBM outperformed (C-statistic from testing sample = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.83-0.84) RF (C-statistic = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.79-0.80), EN (C-statistic = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.80-0.81), and LASSO (C-statistic = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.80-0.81), p < 0.05. Area-level SDOH significantly increased the discriminative ability versus models without SDOH (C-statistic for GBM = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.84-0.85 vs. 0.84, 95% CI = 0.83-0.84), p < 0.05.Conclusions Using EHRs of patients with type 2 diabetes from a large state, machine learning predicted therapeutic inertia (prevalence = 40%). The model's ability to predict patients at high risk of therapeutic inertia is clinically applicable to diabetes care.
引用
收藏
页码:1419 / 1433
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prediction of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Using Machine Learning and Electronic Health Record Data
    Ward, Andrew
    Sarraju, Ashish
    Chung, Sukyung
    Palaniappan, Latha
    Scheinker, David
    Rodriguez, Fatima
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2019, 140
  • [32] Postoperative delirium prediction using machine learning models and preoperative electronic health record data
    Bishara, Andrew
    Chiu, Catherine
    Whitlock, Elizabeth L.
    Douglas, Vanja C.
    Lee, Sei
    Butte, Atul J.
    Leung, Jacqueline M.
    Donovan, Anne L.
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [33] TRENDS IN TYPE 2 DIABETES INPATIENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VISITS AND OUTCOMES USING ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD DATA
    Peyerl, F. W.
    Khangulov, V. S.
    Ravindranath, A. J.
    Marinaro, X. F.
    Hwang, S.
    D'Souza, F. T.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S70 - S70
  • [34] Predicting Intensive Care Unit Readmission with Machine Learning Using Electronic Health Record Data
    Rojas, Juan C.
    Carey, Kyle A.
    Edelson, Dana P.
    Venable, Laura R.
    Howell, Michael D.
    Churpek, Matthew M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2018, 15 (07) : 846 - 853
  • [35] Predicting Risk of Hypoglycemia in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes by Electronic Health Record-Based Machine Learning: Development and Validation
    Yang, Hao
    Li, Jiaxi
    Liu, Siru
    Yang, Xiaoling
    Liu, Jialin
    [J]. JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 10 (06)
  • [36] USING ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD DATA TO PREDICT HEART FAILURE DIAGNOSIS
    Shah, N. R.
    Roy, J.
    Stewart, W. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 24 : 210 - 210
  • [37] Learning About Machine Learning: The Promise and Pitfalls of Big Data and the Electronic Health Record
    Deo, Rahul C.
    Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2016, 9 (06): : 618 - 620
  • [38] Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model of Preterm Birth Using Electronic Health Record
    Sun, Qi
    Zou, Xiaoxuan
    Yan, Yousheng
    Zhang, Hongguang
    Wang, Shuo
    Gao, Yongmei
    Liu, Haiyan
    Liu, Shuyu
    Lu, Jianbo
    Yang, Ying
    Ma, Xu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [39] Bidirectional Representation Learning From Transformers Using Multimodal Electronic Health Record Data to Predict Depression
    Meng, Yiwen
    Speier, William
    Ong, Michael K.
    Arnold, Corey W.
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2021, 25 (08) : 3121 - 3129
  • [40] Reducing therapeutic inertia in type 2 diabetes
    Stroud, Mark L.
    Malik, Asif N.
    Ahmad, Shahid
    Ahmed, Saqib
    Kadhem, Leena Abdulla
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2024, 53 (09) : 665 - 670