Development and Validation of an Endometriosis Diagnostic Method Based on Serum Biomarkers and Clinical Variables

被引:13
|
作者
Herranz-Blanco, Barbara [1 ]
Daoud, Elza [1 ]
Vigano, Paola [2 ]
Garcia-Velasco, Juan Antonio [3 ]
Colli, Enrico [1 ]
机构
[1] Chemo Res, Madrid 28050, Spain
[2] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Infertil Unit, I-20122 Milan, Italy
[3] Inst Valenciano Infertil IVIRMA, Madrid 28013, Spain
关键词
endometriosis; biomarker; diagnosis; NEUROTROPHIC FACTOR; WOMEN; CANCER; ACCURACY; CA-125; CA125; PLASMA;
D O I
10.3390/biom13071052
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Endometriosis affects more than 10% of women of reproductive age, significantly impacting their quality of life. Diagnosis typically takes 4 to 11 years from symptom onset. The gold standard for diagnosing this disease, laparoscopy, is invasive, contributing to this delay in diagnosis. Two studies were conducted to develop a diagnostic test based on the combination of serum biomarkers and clinical variables. Study 1, the development study, aimed to: (i) confirm the ability of CA125, BDNF and clinical variables to differentiate between cases and controls, and (ii) develop a diagnostic algorithm based on these results. Study 2 validated the clinical performance of the developed in vitro diagnostic (IVD) test in diagnosing endometriosis. Serum samples and clinical variables extracted from psychometric questionnaires were obtained from the Oxford Endometriosis CaRe Centre biobank (UK). Case/control classification was performed based on laparoscopy and histological verification of the excised lesions. Studies 1 and 2 included n = 204 and n = 79 patients, respectively. Study 1 found a statistically significant difference between cases and controls for levels of both biomarkers. Of the assessed clinical variables from the patients' medical histories, six were found to be significantly different between endometriosis cases and controls. CA125, BDNF and these six clinical variables were combined into a multivariable prediction model. In Study 2, the IVD test demonstrated sensitivity and specificity values of 46.2% (25.5-66.8%) and 100% (86.7-100%), respectively. Due to its high specificity, this IVD test is a simple and accurate rule-in test for early disease identification, even in the presence of non-specific symptoms.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development and validation study of compact biophotonic platform for detection of serum biomarkers
    Tortajada-Genaro, Luis Antonio
    Quintero-Campos, Pedro
    Juarez, Maria Jose
    Ibanez-Echevarria, Ethel
    Chiriac, Anca Mirela
    Fernandez, Estrella
    Morais, Sergi
    Maquieira, Angel
    TALANTA, 2024, 278
  • [32] Discovery and Validation of Serum MicroRNAs as Early Diagnostic Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer in Chinese Population
    Lyu, Ji
    Zhao, Lin
    Wang, Fubo
    Ji, Jin
    Cao, Zhi
    Xu, Huan
    Shi, Xiaolei
    Zhu, Yasheng
    Zhang, Chao
    Guo, Fei
    Yang, Bo
    Sun, Yinghao
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 2019
  • [33] Development, validation and clinical utility of a suite of simplified clinical diagnostic models for neurosyphilis based on multiple guidelines
    Lu, Zhen
    Fu, Leiwen
    Huang, Lixia
    Ke, Wujian
    Leng, Xinying
    Li, Yuwei
    Lin, Yi-Fan
    Marra, Christina M.
    Tian, Tian
    Wang, Junfeng
    Wang, Liuyuan
    Weng, Wenjia
    Wu, Jiaxin
    Wu, Xinsheng
    Yang, Bin
    Yang, Ligang
    Yang, Luoyao
    Zhang, Xiaohui
    Zhou, Xinyi
    Zou, Huachun
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2024, 51 (01) : S400 - S401
  • [34] Development and validation of flow cytometry methods for pharmacodynamic clinical biomarkers
    Wu, Dianna Y.
    Patti-Diaz, Lisa
    Hill, Carla G.
    BIOANALYSIS, 2010, 2 (09) : 1617 - 1626
  • [35] Genomic Biomarkers for Personalized Medicine: Development and Validation in Clinical Studies
    Matsui, Shigeyuki
    COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 2013
  • [36] Machine learning-based integrated identification of predictive combined diagnostic biomarkers for endometriosis
    Zhang, Haolong
    Zhang, Haoling
    Yang, Huadi
    Shuid, Ahmad Naqib
    Sandai, Doblin
    Chen, Xingbei
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2023, 14
  • [37] Identification and verification of diagnostic biomarkers for deep infiltrating endometriosis based on machine learning algorithms
    Shi, Shanping
    Huang, Chao
    Tang, Xiaojian
    Liu, Hua
    Feng, Weiwei
    Chen, Chen
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 18 (01):
  • [38] Identification and Validation of Four Serum Biomarkers With Optimal Diagnostic and Prognostic Potential for Gastric Cancer Based on Machine Learning Algorithms
    Liu, Yi
    Bian, Bingxian
    Chen, Shiyu
    Zhou, Bingqian
    Zhang, Peng
    Shen, Lisong
    Chen, Hui
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (06):
  • [39] Serum microRNAs as diagnostic markers of endometriosis: a comprehensive array-based analysis
    Cosar, Emine
    Mamillapalli, Ramanaiah
    Ersoy, Gulcin Sahin
    Cho, SihYun
    Seifer, Benjamin
    Taylor, Hugh S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (02) : 402 - 409
  • [40] Identification and validation of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer based on WGCNA
    Xiao, Xi
    Qing, Liangliang
    Li, Zonglin
    Ye, Fuxiang
    Dong, Yajia
    Mi, Jun
    Tian, Junqiang
    DISCOVER ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (01)