Blind assessment of monomeric AlphaFold2 protein structure models with experimental NMR data

被引:13
|
作者
Li, Ethan H. [1 ]
Spaman, Laura E. [1 ]
Tejero, Roberto [1 ]
Huang, Yuanpeng Janet [1 ]
Ramelot, Theresa A. [1 ]
Fraga, Keith J. [1 ]
Prestegard, James H. [2 ]
Kennedy, Michael A. [3 ]
Montelione, Gaetano T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Ctr Biotechnol & Interdisciplinary Sci, Dept Chem & Chem Biol, Troy, NY 12180 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Complex Carbohydrate Res Ctr, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Miami Univ, Dept Chem & Biochem, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
AlphaFold2; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Protein NMR; Model validation; NMR data; STRUCTURE VALIDATION; X-RAY; SEQUENCE; PREDICTIONS; REFINEMENT; ALGORITHMS; PRECISION; SOFTWARE; GEOMETRY; FOLD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmr.2023.107481
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Recent advances in molecular modeling of protein structures are changing the field of structural biology. AlphaFold-2 (AF2), an AI system developed by DeepMind, Inc., utilizes attention-based deep learning to predict models of protein structures with high accuracy relative to structures determined by X-ray crys-tallography and cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM). Comparing AF2 models to structures determined using solution NMR data, both high similarities and distinct differences have been observed. Since AF2 was trained on X-ray crystal and cryoEM structures, we assessed how accurately AF2 can model small, monomeric, solution protein NMR structures which (i) were not used in the AF2 training data set, and (ii) did not have homologous structures in the Protein Data Bank at the time of AF2 training. We identified nine open-source protein NMR data sets for such "blind" targets, including chemical shift, raw NMR FID data, NOESY peak lists, and (for 1 case) 15N-1H residual dipolar coupling data. For these nine small (70- 108 residues) monomeric proteins, we generated AF2 prediction models and assessed how well these models fit to these experimental NMR data, using several well-established NMR structure validation tools. In most of these cases, the AF2 models fit the NMR data nearly as well, or sometimes better than, the corresponding NMR structure models previously deposited in the Protein Data Bank. These results provide benchmark NMR data for assessing new NMR data analysis and protein structure prediction methods. They also document the potential for using AF2 as a guiding tool in protein NMR data analysis, and more generally for hypothesis generation in structural biology research.& COPY; 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AlphaFold2 as a replacement for solution NMR structure determination of small proteins: Not so fast!
    Bonin, Jeffrey P.
    Aramini, James M.
    Dong, Ying
    Wu, Hao
    Kay, Lewis E.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2024, 364
  • [22] NMR hawk-eyed view of AlphaFold2 structures
    Zweckstetter, Markus
    PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2021, 30 (11) : 2333 - 2337
  • [23] Protein structure prediction by AlphaFold2: are attention and symmetries all you need?
    Bouatta, Nazim
    Sorger, Peter
    AlQuraishi, Mohammed
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION D-STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2021, 77 : 982 - 991
  • [24] AlphaFold2 fails to predict protein fold switching
    Chakravarty, Devlina
    Porter, Lauren L.
    PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2022, 31 (06)
  • [25] Structure comparison of heme-binding sites in heme protein predicted by AlphaFold3 and AlphaFold2
    Kondo, Hiroko X.
    Takano, Yu
    CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2024, 53 (08)
  • [26] The intrinsically disordered protein glue of the myelin major dense line: Linking AlphaFold2 predictions to experimental data
    Krokengen, Oda C.
    Raasakka, Arne
    Kursula, Petri
    BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS REPORTS, 2023, 34
  • [27] A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications
    Akdel, Mehmet
    Pires, Douglas E., V
    Porta Pardo, Eduard
    Janes, Jurgen
    Zalevsky, Arthur O.
    Meszaros, Balint
    Bryant, Patrick
    Good, Lydia L.
    Laskowski, Roman A.
    Pozzati, Gabriele
    Shenoy, Aditi
    Zhu, Wensi
    Kundrotas, Petras
    Serra, Victoria Ruiz
    Rodrigues, Carlos H. M.
    Dunham, Alistair S.
    Burke, David
    Borkakoti, Neera
    Velankar, Sameer
    Frost, Adam
    Basquin, Jerome
    Lindorff-Larsen, Kresten
    Bateman, Alex
    Kajava, Andrey, V
    Valencia, Alfonso
    Ovchinnikov, Sergey
    Durairaj, Janani
    Ascher, David B.
    Thornton, Janet M.
    Davey, Norman E.
    Stein, Amelie
    Elofsson, Arne
    Croll, Tristan, I
    Beltrao, Pedro
    NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (11) : 1056 - +
  • [28] A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications
    Mehmet Akdel
    Douglas E. V. Pires
    Eduard Porta Pardo
    Jürgen Jänes
    Arthur O. Zalevsky
    Bálint Mészáros
    Patrick Bryant
    Lydia L. Good
    Roman A. Laskowski
    Gabriele Pozzati
    Aditi Shenoy
    Wensi Zhu
    Petras Kundrotas
    Victoria Ruiz Serra
    Carlos H. M. Rodrigues
    Alistair S. Dunham
    David Burke
    Neera Borkakoti
    Sameer Velankar
    Adam Frost
    Jérôme Basquin
    Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
    Alex Bateman
    Andrey V. Kajava
    Alfonso Valencia
    Sergey Ovchinnikov
    Janani Durairaj
    David B. Ascher
    Janet M. Thornton
    Norman E. Davey
    Amelie Stein
    Arne Elofsson
    Tristan I. Croll
    Pedro Beltrao
    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 2022, 29 : 1056 - 1067
  • [29] AlphaFold2: A Role for Disordered Protein/Region Prediction?
    Wilson, Carter J.
    Choy, Wing-Yiu
    Karttunen, Mikko
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2022, 23 (09)
  • [30] AlphaFold2 versus experimental structures: evaluation on G protein-coupled receptors
    Xin-heng He
    Chong-zhao You
    Hua-liang Jiang
    Yi Jiang
    H. Eric Xu
    Xi Cheng
    Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, 2023, 44 : 1 - 7