Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment for Displaced Finger Metacarpal Shaft Fractures A Prospective, Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:8
|
作者
Peyronson, Fredrik [1 ,2 ]
Ostwald, Cecilia Stalberg [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hailer, Nils P. [1 ,2 ]
Giddins, Grey [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Vedung, Torbjorn [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Muder, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ Hosp, Dept Surg Sci Orthoped & Hand Surg, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Falun Cent Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Falun, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Ctr Clin Res Dalarna, Falun, Sweden
[4] Hand Elbow Clin, Bath, England
[5] Elisabeth Hosp, Aleris Healthcare AB, Uppsala, Sweden
来源
关键词
CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; NECK FRACTURES; ANGULATION; VALIDITY; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.22.00573
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
UpdateThis article was updated on January 18, 2023, because of a previous error, which was discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. On page 103, in the first column of Table III, the continuous outcomes, which had been given as "Median" and "(range)", are now given as "Mean" and "(95% CI)", respectively. Background:Finger metacarpal fractures represent up to 31% of all hand fractures, and most can be treated nonoperatively. Whether operative treatment is superior to nonoperative treatment for oblique and/or spiral finger metacarpal shaft fractures (MSFs) is unknown.Methods:Forty-two patients with displaced oblique and/or spiral finger MSFs were randomized to either nonoperative treatment with unrestricted mobilization or operative treatment with screw fixation. The primary outcome was grip strength in the injured hand compared with the uninjured hand at the 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, range of motion, metacarpal shortening, complications, sick leave duration, patient satisfaction, and costs.Results:All patients attended the 1-year follow-up. Mean grip strength relative to that in the contralateral hand was 104% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89% to 120%) in the nonoperative group and 96% (95% CI, 89% to 103%) in the operative group (p = 0.34). Mean metacarpal shortening was 5.3 mm (95% CI, 4.2 to 6.4 mm) in the nonoperative group and 2.3 mm (95% CI, 0.8 to 3.9 mm) in the operative group. In the nonoperative group, 1 minor complication was observed; in the operative group, there were 4 minor complications and 3 reoperations. The costs were estimated at 1,347 U.S. dollars (USD) for nonoperative treatment compared with 3,834 USD for operative treatment. Sick leave duration was significantly shorter in the nonoperative group (12 days [95% CI, 5 to 21 days] versus 35 days [95% CI, 20 to 54 days]) (p = 0.008).Conclusions:When treated with unrestricted mobilization, patients with a single displaced spiral and/or oblique finger MSF have outcomes comparable to those treated operatively, despite metacarpal shortening. Costs are substantially higher (2.8 times) and sick leave is significantly higher in the operative group.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 106
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial
    Agren, Per-Henrik
    Wretenberg, Per
    Sayed-Noor, Arkan S.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (15): : 1351 - 1357
  • [2] Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Acute Displaced Distal Clavicle Fractures: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
    Hall, Jeremy A.
    Schemitsch, Christine E.
    Vicente, Milena R.
    Dehghan, Niloofar
    Nauth, Aaron
    Nowak, Lauren L.
    Schemitsch, Emil H.
    McKee, Michael D.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2021, 35 (12) : 660 - 666
  • [3] The Clavicle Trial A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Operative with Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures
    Ahrens, Philip M.
    Garlick, Nicholas I.
    Barber, Julie
    Tims, Emily M.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (16):
  • [4] Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment of Displaced Ankle Fractures in Diabetics
    Lovy, Andrew J.
    Dowdell, James
    Keswani, Aakash
    Koehler, Steven
    Kim, Jaehon
    Weinfeld, Steven
    Joseph, David
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 38 (03) : 255 - 260
  • [5] Analysis of Operative versus Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Scapular Fractures
    Jones, Clifford B.
    Sietsema, Debra L.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (12) : 3379 - 3389
  • [6] Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures
    Stengel, D.
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2012, 115 (11): : 1041 - 1043
  • [7] Comparative Effectiveness of Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment of Completely Displaced Clavicle Shaft Fractures Among Children
    Ames, Tyler D.
    Mehlman, Charles T.
    Toy, Robert
    Parikh, Shital N.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2022, 45 (06) : 373 - +
  • [8] Outcomes of Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Pediatric Clavicle Fractures
    Hagstrom, Lindsey S.
    Ferrick, Michael
    Galpin, Robert
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 38 (02) : E135 - E138
  • [9] Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Closed Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures
    Sax, Oliver C.
    Monarrez, Ruben
    Bains, Sandeep S.
    Douglas, Scott J.
    Ingari, John V.
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2024, 19 (02): : 294 - 299
  • [10] Humeral shaft fracture: a randomized controlled trial of nonoperative versus operative management (plate fixation)
    Khameneh, Seyed Mandi Hosseini
    Abbasian, Mohammad Reza
    Abrishamkarzadeh, Hashem
    Bagheri, Shahab
    Abdollahimajd, Fahimeh
    Safdari, Farshad
    Rahimi-Dehgolan, Shahram
    ORTHOPEDIC RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2019, 11 : 141 - 147