Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Acute Displaced Distal Clavicle Fractures: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:19
|
作者
Hall, Jeremy A. [1 ]
Schemitsch, Christine E. [1 ]
Vicente, Milena R. [1 ]
Dehghan, Niloofar [2 ,3 ]
Nauth, Aaron [1 ]
Nowak, Lauren L. [4 ]
Schemitsch, Emil H. [4 ]
McKee, Michael D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, 55 Queen St East,Suite 800, Toronto, ON M5C 1R6, Canada
[2] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] CORE Inst, Phoenix, AZ USA
[4] Western Univ, Dept Surg, London, ON, Canada
关键词
type II distal clavicle fractures; operative treatment; nonoperative treatment; functional outcome; HOOK PLATE FIXATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/BOT.0000000000002211
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the differences in patient outcomes after operative or nonoperative treatment of displaced, type II distal clavicle fractures. Design: Multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Setting: Level I trauma centers. Patients/Participants: Patients with completely displaced type II distal clavicle fractures were included. Fifty-seven patients were randomized: 27 to the operative group and 30 to the nonoperative group. Intervention: Patients randomized to nonoperative care received a standard shoulder sling, followed by pendulum or gentle range of motion shoulder exercises at any time as directed by the attending surgeon. Patients randomized to the operative group received plate fixation with a precontoured distal clavicular plate or a "hook" plate within 28 days from injury. Main Outcome Measure: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores at 1 year. Results: There were no between-group differences in Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand or Constant scores at 1 year. More patients in the operative group went on to union (95% vs. 64%, P = 0.02) within 1 year. Twelve patients in the operative group underwent a second operation for implant removal (12/27, 44%). In the nonoperative group, 6 patients (6/30, 20%) subsequently underwent 8 operative procedures. Conclusion: Although this study failed to demonstrate a difference in functional outcomes between operative and nonoperative treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures, nonoperative management led to more complications including a moderate rate of nonunion, which often required secondary surgery to correct, a higher rate of early dissatisfaction with shoulder appearance, and a delayed return to activities in the first 6 months. Operative management provided a safe and reliable treatment option with few complications, but often required secondary implant removal, especially with hook plate fixation.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 666
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Clavicle Trial A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Operative with Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures
    Ahrens, Philip M.
    Garlick, Nicholas I.
    Barber, Julie
    Tims, Emily M.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (16):
  • [2] Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial
    Agren, Per-Henrik
    Wretenberg, Per
    Sayed-Noor, Arkan S.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (15): : 1351 - 1357
  • [3] Outcomes of Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Pediatric Clavicle Fractures
    Hagstrom, Lindsey S.
    Ferrick, Michael
    Galpin, Robert
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 38 (02) : E135 - E138
  • [4] Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Closed Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures
    Sax, Oliver C.
    Monarrez, Ruben
    Bains, Sandeep S.
    Douglas, Scott J.
    Ingari, John V.
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2024, 19 (02): : 294 - 299
  • [5] Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment for Displaced Finger Metacarpal Shaft Fractures A Prospective, Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Peyronson, Fredrik
    Ostwald, Cecilia Stalberg
    Hailer, Nils P.
    Giddins, Grey
    Vedung, Torbjorn
    Muder, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2023, 105 (02): : 98 - 106
  • [6] Nonoperative versus operative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents: a comparative study
    Song, Mi Hyun
    Yun, Yeo-Hon
    Kang, Kimoon
    Hyun, Myung Jae
    Choi, Sungwook
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2019, 28 (01): : 45 - 50
  • [7] Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review
    Rehn C.-H.
    Kirkegaard M.
    Viberg B.
    Larsen M.S.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2014, 24 (7) : 1047 - 1053
  • [8] Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Unstable Lateral Malleolar Fractures: A Randomized Multicenter Trial
    Sanders, David W.
    Tieszer, Christina
    Corbett, Bradley
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2012, 26 (03) : 129 - 134
  • [9] Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Unstable Lateral Malleolar Fractures: A Randomized Multicenter Trial
    Sanders, D. W.
    Tieszer, C.
    Corbett, B.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (09) : 794 - 795
  • [10] Open Reduction and Plate Fixation Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Robinson, C. M.
    Goudie, E. B.
    Murray, I. R.
    Jenkins, P. J.
    Ahktar, M. A.
    Read, E. O.
    Foster, C. J.
    Clark, K.
    Brooksbank, A. J.
    Arthur, A.
    Crowther, M. A.
    Packham, I.
    Chesser, T. J.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (17): : 1576 - 1584