Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment for Displaced Finger Metacarpal Shaft Fractures A Prospective, Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:8
|
作者
Peyronson, Fredrik [1 ,2 ]
Ostwald, Cecilia Stalberg [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hailer, Nils P. [1 ,2 ]
Giddins, Grey [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Vedung, Torbjorn [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Muder, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ Hosp, Dept Surg Sci Orthoped & Hand Surg, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Falun Cent Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Falun, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Ctr Clin Res Dalarna, Falun, Sweden
[4] Hand Elbow Clin, Bath, England
[5] Elisabeth Hosp, Aleris Healthcare AB, Uppsala, Sweden
来源
关键词
CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; NECK FRACTURES; ANGULATION; VALIDITY; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.22.00573
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
UpdateThis article was updated on January 18, 2023, because of a previous error, which was discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. On page 103, in the first column of Table III, the continuous outcomes, which had been given as "Median" and "(range)", are now given as "Mean" and "(95% CI)", respectively. Background:Finger metacarpal fractures represent up to 31% of all hand fractures, and most can be treated nonoperatively. Whether operative treatment is superior to nonoperative treatment for oblique and/or spiral finger metacarpal shaft fractures (MSFs) is unknown.Methods:Forty-two patients with displaced oblique and/or spiral finger MSFs were randomized to either nonoperative treatment with unrestricted mobilization or operative treatment with screw fixation. The primary outcome was grip strength in the injured hand compared with the uninjured hand at the 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, range of motion, metacarpal shortening, complications, sick leave duration, patient satisfaction, and costs.Results:All patients attended the 1-year follow-up. Mean grip strength relative to that in the contralateral hand was 104% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89% to 120%) in the nonoperative group and 96% (95% CI, 89% to 103%) in the operative group (p = 0.34). Mean metacarpal shortening was 5.3 mm (95% CI, 4.2 to 6.4 mm) in the nonoperative group and 2.3 mm (95% CI, 0.8 to 3.9 mm) in the operative group. In the nonoperative group, 1 minor complication was observed; in the operative group, there were 4 minor complications and 3 reoperations. The costs were estimated at 1,347 U.S. dollars (USD) for nonoperative treatment compared with 3,834 USD for operative treatment. Sick leave duration was significantly shorter in the nonoperative group (12 days [95% CI, 5 to 21 days] versus 35 days [95% CI, 20 to 54 days]) (p = 0.008).Conclusions:When treated with unrestricted mobilization, patients with a single displaced spiral and/or oblique finger MSF have outcomes comparable to those treated operatively, despite metacarpal shortening. Costs are substantially higher (2.8 times) and sick leave is significantly higher in the operative group.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 106
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures-A Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial
    Smekal, Vinzenz
    Irenberger, Alexander
    Struve, Peter
    Wambacher, Markus
    Krappinger, Dietmar
    Kralinger, Franz Sebastian
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2009, 23 (02) : 106 - 112
  • [22] Operative versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Lingde Kong
    Yingze Zhang
    Yong Shen
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2014, 134 : 1493 - 1500
  • [23] Operative vs nonoperative treatment of intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus: A prospective randomized trial
    Thordarson, DB
    Krieger, LE
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 17 (01) : 2 - 9
  • [24] Operative versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Kong, Lingde
    Zhang, Yingze
    Shen, Yong
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2014, 134 (11) : 1493 - 1500
  • [25] A prospective study of the treatment of fractures of the little finger metacarpal shaft with a short hand cast
    Debnath, UK
    Nassab, RS
    Oni, JA
    Davis, TRC
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2004, 29B (03): : 214 - 217
  • [26] Plate Fixation Compared with Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
    Woltz, Sarah
    Stegeman, Sylvia A.
    Krijnen, Pieta
    van Dijkman, Bart A.
    van Thiel, Tom P. H.
    Schep, Niels W. L.
    de Rijcke, Piet A. R.
    Frolke, Jan Paul M.
    Schipper, Inger B.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (02): : 106 - 112
  • [27] Displaced Tibial Shaft Fractures With Intact Fibula in Children: Nonoperative Management Versus Operative Treatment With Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing
    Canavese, Federico
    Botnari, Alexei
    Andreacchio, Antonio
    Marengo, Lorenza
    Samba, Antoine
    Dimeglio, Alain
    Pereira, Bruno
    Mansour, Mounira
    Rousset, Marie
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 36 (07) : 667 - 672
  • [28] Displaced proximal humeral fractures: operative versus non-operative treatment—a 2-year extension of a randomized controlled trial
    Fjalestad T.
    Hole M.Ø.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2014, 24 (7) : 1067 - 1073
  • [29] Nonoperative versus operative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents: a comparative study
    Song, Mi Hyun
    Yun, Yeo-Hon
    Kang, Kimoon
    Hyun, Myung Jae
    Choi, Sungwook
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2019, 28 (01): : 45 - 50
  • [30] Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Proximal Humeral Physeal Fractures: A Matched Cohort
    Chaus, George W.
    Carry, Patrick M.
    Pishkenari, Azin K.
    Hadley-Miller, Nancy
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 35 (03) : 234 - 239