Pareto optimal solution set strategy based on multiobjective optimization for the clinching tools

被引:2
|
作者
Xu, Fan [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Ming [2 ]
Ma, Chao [1 ]
Zhao, Huiyan [3 ]
Zhu, Jianxiong [1 ]
Zhang, Zhen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol LiaoNing, Sch Mech Engn & Automat, 189 Qianshan Ctr Rd, Anshan 114051, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Mech Engn, 301 Xuefu Rd, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
[3] Yingkou Inst Technol, Sch Mech & Power Engn, 46 Bowen Rd, Yingkou 115014, Peoples R China
关键词
Clinched joint; Optimization design; Necking thickness; Interlocking thickness; Pareto solution; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; FAILURE BEHAVIOR; ALLOY; JOINT; METHODOLOGY; ALGORITHM; STRENGTH; ALUMINUM;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-023-12133-2
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The geometric size of clinching tools determines the geometric size and strength of the clinched joints. This study establishes an orthogonal analysis experimental plan to examine how the geometric size of a tool affects the objective functions of a clinched joint, including its bottom, necking, and interlocking thicknesses. Particularly, the study evaluates the effects of die radius, die depth, punch stroke, punch radius, and punch fillet on the geometric size of the clinched joint. A multiple quadratic regression model is used to quantitatively analyze the contribution value of the feature parameters of the tool to the objective function. Furthermore, a multiobjective genetic algorithm based on the Pareto solution is used to solve the multiple quadratic regression model, and the optimal combination size of the tool is determined by comparing theoretical and simulation calculations. The optimal die radius is 4.6 mm, the die height is 1.10 mm, the punch stroke is 4.1 mm, the punch is 2.6 mm, and the punch fillet is 0.5 mm. These parameters are used to manufacture a pair of tool for improving clinched joint quality.
引用
收藏
页码:3375 / 3389
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multiobjective particle swarm optimization based on Pareto entropy
    Hu, W. (scuhuwang@126.com), 1600, Chinese Academy of Sciences (25):
  • [22] Cluster based solution exploration strategy for multiobjective particle swarm optimization
    Hsieh, Sheng-Ta
    Sun, Tsung-Ying
    Chiu, Shih-Yuan
    Liu, Chan-Cheng
    Lin, Cheng-Wei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IASTED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2007, : 295 - 300
  • [23] On Set-Based Multiobjective Optimization
    Zitzler, Eckart
    Thiele, Lothar
    Bader, Johannes
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2010, 14 (01) : 58 - 79
  • [24] ɛ-Subdifferentials of Set-valued Maps and ɛ-Weak Pareto Optimality for Multiobjective Optimization
    A. Taa
    Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 2005, 62 : 187 - 209
  • [25] Pareto set analysis: local measures of objective coupling in multiobjective design optimization
    Bart D. Frischknecht
    Diane L. Peters
    Panos Y. Papalambros
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2011, 43 : 617 - 630
  • [26] Shape optimization methodology of clinching tools based on Bezier curve
    Wang, Meng-han
    Xiao, Gui-qian
    Li, Zhi
    Wang, Jin-qiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 94 (5-8): : 2267 - 2280
  • [27] Shape optimization methodology of clinching tools based on Bezier curve
    Meng-han Wang
    Gui-qian Xiao
    Zhi Li
    Jin-qiang Wang
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018, 94 : 2267 - 2280
  • [28] Pareto set analysis: local measures of objective coupling in multiobjective design optimization
    Frischknecht, Bart D.
    Peters, Diane L.
    Papalambros, Panos Y.
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2011, 43 (05) : 617 - 630
  • [29] ε-Subdifferentials of set-valued maps and ε-weak Pareto optimality for multiobjective optimization
    Taa, A
    MATHEMATICAL METHODS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2005, 62 (02) : 187 - 209
  • [30] A method for generating a well-distributed Pareto set in nonlinear multiobjective optimization
    Utyuzhnikov, S. V.
    Fantini, P.
    Guenov, M. D.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2009, 223 (02) : 820 - 841