Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring

被引:5
|
作者
Thompson, Matthew J. J. [1 ]
Anderson, Melissa L. L. [2 ]
Cook, Andrea J. J. [2 ]
Ehrlich, Kelly [2 ]
Hall, Yoshio N. N. [3 ]
Hsu, Clarissa [2 ]
Margolis, Karen L. L. [4 ]
McClure, Jennifer B. B. [2 ,5 ]
Munson, Sean A. A. [6 ]
Green, Beverly B. B. [2 ,5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Family Med, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Washington Hlth Res Inst, 1730 Minor Ave Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[3] Vet Affairs Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Div Nephrol, Seattle, WA USA
[4] HealthPartners Inst, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Kaiser Permanente Bernard J Tyson Sch Med, Pasadena, CA USA
[6] Univ Washington, Dept Human Ctr Design & Engn, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Washington Permanente Med Grp, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
关键词
hypertension; diagnosis; blood pressure monitoring; acceptability; adherence; ambulatory; home; VALIDATION; ADULTS; HYPERTENSION; ACCURACY; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-023-08036-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends measuring blood pressure (BP) outside of clinic/office settings. While various options are available, including home devices, BP kiosks, and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), understanding patient acceptability and adherence is a critical factor for implementation.OBJECTIVE: To compare the acceptability and adherence of clinic, home, kiosk, and ABPM measurement. DESIGN: Comparative diagnostic accuracy study which randomized adults to one of three BP measurement arms: clinic, home, and kiosk. ABPM was conducted on all participants.PARTICIPANTS: Adults (18-85 years) receiving care at 12 Kaiser Permanente Washington primary care clinics (Washington State, USA) with a high BP (>= 138 mmHg systolic or >= 88 mmHg diastolic) in the electronic health record with no hypertension diagnosis and on no hypertensive medications and with high BP at a research screening visit.MEASURES: Patient acceptability was measured using a validated survey which was used to calculate an overall acceptability score (range 1-7) at baseline, after completing their assigned BP measurement intervention, and after completing ABPM. Adherence was defined based on the pre-specified number of BP measurements completed.KEY RESULTS: Five hundred ten participants were randomized (mean age 59 years), with mean BP of 150/88. Overall acceptability score was highest (i.e. most acceptable) for Home BP (mean 6.2, SD 0.7) and lowest (least acceptable) for ABPM (mean 5.0, SD 1.0); scores were intermediate for Clinic (5.5, SD 1.1) and Kiosk (5.4, SD 1.0). Adherence was higher for Home (154/170, 90.6%) and Clinic (150/172, 87.2%) than for Kiosk (114/168, 67.9%)). The majority of participants (467/510, 91.6%) were adherent to ABPM.Conclusions: Participants found home BP measurement most acceptable followed by clinic, BP kiosks, and ABPM. Our findings, coupled with recent evidence regarding the accuracy of home BP measurement, further support the routine use of home-based BP measurement in primary care practice in the US.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03130257 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03130257
引用
收藏
页码:1854 / 1861
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring
    Matthew J. Thompson
    Melissa L. Anderson
    Andrea J. Cook
    Kelly Ehrlich
    Yoshio N. Hall
    Clarissa Hsu
    Karen L. Margolis
    Jennifer B. McClure
    Sean A. Munson
    Beverly B. Green
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2023, 38 : 1854 - 1861
  • [2] Acceptability And Adherence To Home, Kiosk, Office Blood Pressure Measurement Compared To 24-Hour Ambulatory Monitoring In Primary Care
    Thompson, Matthew
    Green, Beverly
    Ehrlich, Kelly
    Hall, Yoshio
    Anderson, Melissa
    McClure, Jennifer
    Margolis, Karen L.
    Joseph, Dwayne
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2021, 78
  • [3] Assessment of blood pressure in patients with Type 2 diabetes: comparison between home blood pressure monitoring, clinic blood pressure measurement and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
    Masding, MG
    Jones, JR
    Bartley, E
    Sandeman, DD
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2001, 18 (06) : 431 - 437
  • [4] Conventional office blood pressure measurements and unattended automated office blood pressure compared with home self-measurement and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
    Fonseca-Reyes, Salvador
    Fonseca-Cortes, Karla
    Coca, Antonio
    Romero-Velarde, Enrique
    Perez-Molina, Jesus
    [J]. BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2023, 28 (01) : 59 - 66
  • [5] Limited reproducibility of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
    Keren, Shay
    Leibowitz, Avshalom
    Grossman, Ehud
    Sharabi, Yehonatan
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPERTENSION, 2015, 37 (07) : 599 - 603
  • [6] Ambulatory 24-h Blood Pressure Measurement in Patients with Glaucoma
    Weisser, B.
    Erb, C.
    [J]. KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2015, 232 (02) : 169 - 173
  • [7] TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF BLOOD-PRESSURE BY AMBULATORY 24-H BLOOD-PRESSURE MONITORING
    LIBRETTI, A
    LATTUADA, S
    RINDI, M
    GRILLO, A
    SALVAGGIO, A
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPERTENSION PART A-THEORY AND PRACTICE, 1985, 7 (2-3) : 463 - 467
  • [8] Sustained high blood pressure and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in Tanzanian adolescents
    Mussa K. Nsanya
    Philip Ayieko
    Ramadhan Hashim
    Ezekiel Mgema
    Daniel Fitzgerald
    Saidi Kapiga
    Robert N. Peck
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 11
  • [9] Sustained high blood pressure and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in Tanzanian adolescents
    Nsanya, Mussa K.
    Ayieko, Philip
    Hashim, Ramadhan
    Mgema, Ezekiel
    Fitzgerald, Daniel
    Kapiga, Saidi
    Peck, Robert N.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [10] Accuracy of pulse rate derived from 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring compared with heart rate from 24-h Holter-ECG
    Lauder, Lucas
    Scholz, Sean S.
    Ewen, Sebastian
    Lettner, Christine
    Ukena, Christian
    Bohm, Michael
    Mahfoud, Felix
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2020, 38 (12) : 2387 - 2392