Does mirabegron have a potential role as a medical expulsive therapy in the treatment of distal ureteral stones? A prospective randomized controlled study

被引:3
|
作者
Samir, Mohamed [1 ,3 ]
Awad, Ahmed Fouad [2 ]
Maged, Wael Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ Hosp, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Al Azhar Univ, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Distal ureteral stone; mirabegron; medical expulsive therapy; silodosin; urolithiasis; FACILITATE PASSAGE; FUNCTIONAL-ROLE; MANAGEMENT; EXPRESSION; EFFICACY; SUBTYPES;
D O I
10.1177/03915603231204081
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The existence of beta 3 receptors in the bladder and ureter was documented in many studies on animals and humans, it was documented that relaxation of the lower ureteral segment is achieved by the stimulation of these receptors. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of mirabegron as a medical expulsive therapy (MET) for distal ureteral stones in comparison with silodosin and placebo.Methods: One hundred eighty patients with distal ureteral stone of 5-10 mm size were included in our study. They were divided into three groups, and each one consisted of 60 patients. Group I was given silodosin 8 mg, group II mirabegron 50 mg and group III placebo once daily. The treatment was prescribed for all the cases till stone expulsion or a maximum duration of 4 weeks. Primary outcome was the stone expulsion rate (SER). While secondary outcomes were stone expulsion time, side effects of the used drugs, hospital visits number for pain, and amount of analgesic taken.Results: We found that the SER was significantly higher in silodosin than mirabegron and placebo groups (61%, 38.6%, and 36.7%, respectively) (p = 0.013). Also, the stone expulsion interval was significantly shorter in silodosin than mirabegron and control groups (p < 0.001). While hospital visits number for pain, and amount of analgesic taken were comparable. There was no difference between the studied medications in terms of the adverse effects except for retrograde ejaculation (silodosin = 63.3%, mirabegron = 0%, and placebo = 0%; p < 0.001).Conclusion: Mirabegron has no medical expulsive effect. While silodosin improves SER and stone expulsion time. However, retrograde ejaculation was its main side effect and occurred in 63.3% of the male patients. Therefore, more research is needed to discover a more tolerable MET.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 140
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The medical-expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: Which is the optimal choice?
    Dellabella, M
    Milanese, G
    Muzzonigro, G
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 303 - 304
  • [42] Comment on: Tamsulosin versus nifedipine in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones
    Cao, Dehong
    Liu, Liangren
    Wei, Qiang
    RENAL FAILURE, 2015, 37 (03) : 531 - 531
  • [43] Can Sexual Intercourse Be an Alternative Therapy for Distal Ureteral Stones? A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
    Doluoglu, Omer Gokhan
    Demirbas, Arif
    Kilinc, Muhammed Fatih
    Karakan, Tolga
    Kabar, Mucahit
    Bozkurt, Selen
    Resorlu, Berkan
    UROLOGY, 2015, 86 (01) : 19 - 23
  • [44] Naftopidil versus flopropione as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: results of a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial
    Kohjimoto, Yasuo
    Hagino, Keizo
    Ogawa, Takatoshi
    Inagaki, Takeshi
    Kitamura, Shinji
    Nishihata, Masaya
    Iba, Akinori
    Matsumura, Nagahide
    Hara, Isao
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 33 (12) : 2125 - 2129
  • [45] THE ROLE OF α1-BLOCKERS IN THE MEDICAL EXPULSIVE THERAPY FOR URETERAL CALCULI - A PROSPECTIVE CONTROLLED RANDOMIZED STUDY COMPARING TAMSULOSIN AND SILODOSINT
    Georgescu, Dragos
    Ionita-Radu, Florentina
    Multescu, Razvan
    Dragutescu, Mihai
    Geavlete, Bogdan
    Geavlete, Petrisor
    Negrei, Carolina
    Mischianu, Dan
    Georgescu, Mara
    Ginghina, Octav
    FARMACIA, 2015, 63 (02) : 184 - 188
  • [46] Naftopidil versus flopropione as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: results of a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial
    Yasuo Kohjimoto
    Keizo Hagino
    Takatoshi Ogawa
    Takeshi Inagaki
    Shinji Kitamura
    Masaya Nishihata
    Akinori Iba
    Nagahide Matsumura
    Isao Hara
    World Journal of Urology, 2015, 33 : 2125 - 2129
  • [47] Re: Naftopidil vs silodosin in medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones: A randomized controlled study in Japanese male patients
    Soylemez, Haluk
    Bodakci, Mehmet Nuri
    Hatipoglu, Namik Kemal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 19 (08) : 792 - 792
  • [48] Efficacy of low dose tamsulosin in medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones in Japanese male patients: A randomized controlled study
    Kaneko, Tomoyuki
    Matsushima, Hisashi
    Morimoto, Hirohiko
    Tsuzaka, Yasuo
    Homma, Yukio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 (05) : 462 - 465
  • [49] Evaluation of the efficacy of masturbation on distal ureteral stones: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
    Turgut, Hasan
    Sarier, Mehmet
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 53 (04) : 655 - 660
  • [50] Evaluation of the efficacy of masturbation on distal ureteral stones: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
    Hasan Turgut
    Mehmet Sarıer
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2021, 53 : 655 - 660