Does mirabegron have a potential role as a medical expulsive therapy in the treatment of distal ureteral stones? A prospective randomized controlled study

被引:3
|
作者
Samir, Mohamed [1 ,3 ]
Awad, Ahmed Fouad [2 ]
Maged, Wael Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ Hosp, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Al Azhar Univ, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Distal ureteral stone; mirabegron; medical expulsive therapy; silodosin; urolithiasis; FACILITATE PASSAGE; FUNCTIONAL-ROLE; MANAGEMENT; EXPRESSION; EFFICACY; SUBTYPES;
D O I
10.1177/03915603231204081
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The existence of beta 3 receptors in the bladder and ureter was documented in many studies on animals and humans, it was documented that relaxation of the lower ureteral segment is achieved by the stimulation of these receptors. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of mirabegron as a medical expulsive therapy (MET) for distal ureteral stones in comparison with silodosin and placebo.Methods: One hundred eighty patients with distal ureteral stone of 5-10 mm size were included in our study. They were divided into three groups, and each one consisted of 60 patients. Group I was given silodosin 8 mg, group II mirabegron 50 mg and group III placebo once daily. The treatment was prescribed for all the cases till stone expulsion or a maximum duration of 4 weeks. Primary outcome was the stone expulsion rate (SER). While secondary outcomes were stone expulsion time, side effects of the used drugs, hospital visits number for pain, and amount of analgesic taken.Results: We found that the SER was significantly higher in silodosin than mirabegron and placebo groups (61%, 38.6%, and 36.7%, respectively) (p = 0.013). Also, the stone expulsion interval was significantly shorter in silodosin than mirabegron and control groups (p < 0.001). While hospital visits number for pain, and amount of analgesic taken were comparable. There was no difference between the studied medications in terms of the adverse effects except for retrograde ejaculation (silodosin = 63.3%, mirabegron = 0%, and placebo = 0%; p < 0.001).Conclusion: Mirabegron has no medical expulsive effect. While silodosin improves SER and stone expulsion time. However, retrograde ejaculation was its main side effect and occurred in 63.3% of the male patients. Therefore, more research is needed to discover a more tolerable MET.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 140
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Role of Medical Expulsive Therapy for Ureteral Stones: Pro MET
    Knoll, Thomas
    Tuerk, Christian
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2017, 3 (01): : 3 - 4
  • [32] SILODOSIN FOR MEDICAL EXPULSIVE THERAPY IN CHILDREN WITH DISTAL URETERAL STONE: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, SINGLE BLIND STUDY STUDY
    Fahmy, Ahmed
    Rhasad, Hazem
    Kamal, Amr
    Elsawy, Moustafa
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E1217 - E1217
  • [33] Optimal treatment of distal ureteral stones: A prospective, randomized study
    Pearle, MS
    Petty, B
    Shalhav, AL
    Bercowsky, E
    Figenshau, RS
    McDougall, EM
    Clayman, RV
    Nakada, SY
    Wolf, JS
    Hoenig, DM
    Nadler, R
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (05): : 58 - 58
  • [34] SILODOSIN IN TREATMENT OF DISTAL URETERAL STONES IN CHILDREN: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO CONTROLLED STUDY
    Elgalaly, Hazem
    Eliwa, Ahmed
    Seleem, Mohamed
    Shello, Haitham
    Salem, Emad
    Youssef, Mostafa
    Khalil, Salem
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E717 - E717
  • [35] The Role of Medical Expulsive Therapy for Ureteral Stones: Against MET
    Patterson, Jacob M.
    Wiseman, Oliver J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2017, 3 (01): : 5 - 6
  • [36] A comparison of efficacy of doxazosin 4 and 8 mg in medical expulsive therapy of distal ureteral stones: a prospective randomized clinical trial
    Sen, Haluk
    Erturhan, Sakip
    Sadioglu, Erkan
    Bayrak, Omer
    Seckiner, Ilker
    UROLITHIASIS, 2017, 45 (05) : 461 - 464
  • [37] The Efficacy of Mirabegron in Medical Expulsive Therapy for Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cai, Dawei
    Wei, Guangzhu
    Wu, Peishan
    Huang, Yongjin
    Che, Xuanyan
    Zhang, Yong
    Zhou, Zhongbao
    Kong, Guangqi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 2022 : 2293182
  • [38] Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Naftopidil and Tamsulosin as Medical Expulsive Therapy in Combination With Prednisolone for Distal Ureteral Stones
    Kumar, Santosh
    Kurdia, Kailash Chand
    Ganesamoni, Raguram
    Singh, Shrawan Kumar
    Nanjappa, Bhuvanesh
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 54 (05) : 311 - 315
  • [39] Efficacy of Silodosin in Expulsive Therapy for Distal Ureteral Stones: A Randomized Double-blinded Controlled Trial
    Wang, Chung-Jing
    Tsai, Po-Chao
    Chang, Chien-Hsing
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 13 (03) : 2666 - 2671
  • [40] Naftopidil vs silodosin in medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones: A randomized controlled study in Japanese male patients
    Tsuzaka, Yasuo
    Matsushima, Hisashi
    Kaneko, Tomoyuki
    Yamaguchi, Tsuyoshi
    Homma, Yukio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 18 (11) : 792 - 795