An MRI-based grading system for preoperative risk estimation of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy

被引:3
|
作者
Xu, Lili [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Gumuyang [1 ]
Zhang, Daming [1 ]
Zhang, Jiahui [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoxiao [1 ]
Bai, Xin [1 ]
Chen, Li [1 ]
Peng, Qianyu [1 ]
Xiao, Yu [3 ]
Wang, Hao [3 ]
Jin, Zhengyu [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Hao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, State Key Lab Complex Severe & Rare Dis, Dept Radiol, 1 Shuaifuyuan,Wangfujing St, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Ctr Qual Control Radiol, 1 Shuaifuyuan,Wangfujing St, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Pathol, 1 Shuaifuyuan,Wangfujing St, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Margins of excision; Risk assessment; CANCER; RADIOMICS; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1186/s13244-023-01516-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective To construct a simplified grading system based on MRI features to predict positive surgical margin (PSM) after radical prostatectomy (RP).Methods Patients who had undergone prostate MRI followed by RP between January 2017 and January 2021 were retrospectively enrolled as the derivation group, and those between February 2021 and November 2022 were enrolled as the validation group. One radiologist evaluated tumor-related MRI features, including the capsule contact length (CCL) of lesions, frank extraprostatic extension (EPE), apex abutting, etc. Binary logistic regression and decision tree analysis were used to select risk features for PSM. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of different systems were calculated. The interreader agreement of the scoring systems was evaluated using the kappa statistic.Results There were 29.8% (42/141) and 36.4% (32/88) of patients who had PSM in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. The first grading system was proposed (mrPSM1) using two imaging features, namely, CCL >= 20 mm and apex abutting, and then updated by adding frank EPE (mrPSM2). In the derivation group, the AUC was 0.705 for mrPSM1 and 0.713 for mrPSM2. In the validation group, our grading systems showed comparable AUC with Park et al.'s model (0.672-0.686 vs. 0.646, p > 0.05) and significantly higher specificity (0.732-0.750 vs. 0.411, p < 0.001). The kappa value was 0.764 for mrPSM1 and 0.776 for mrPSM2. Decision curve analysis showed a higher net benefit for mrPSM2.Conclusion The proposed grading systems based on MRI could benefit the risk stratification of PSM and are easily interpretable.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Integration of Multiparameter MRI into Conventional Pretreatment Risk Factors to Predict Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy
    Ma, Ming-Wei
    Wang, Ke
    Gao, Xian-Shu
    Zhu, Tian-Zhao
    Li, Hong-Zhen
    Shen, Qi
    Yang, Kai-Wei
    Qiu, Jian-Xing
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2024, 22 (02) : 281 - 290.e1
  • [42] THE RISK OF IATROGENIC POSITIVE MARGIN IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: AN EXPENDED CRITERION TO EVALUATE THE QUALITY OF SURGICAL RESECTION
    Barre, Christian
    Aillet, Genevieve
    Thoulouzan, Matthieu
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E600 - E600
  • [43] The Status of Positive Surgical Margin at Radical Prostatectomy and Risk of Biochemical Recurrence: A Single Institution Experience
    Li, M.
    Song, J.
    Shikanov, S.
    Eggnener, S.
    Shalhav, A.
    Taxy, J.
    Al-Ahmadie, H.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2009, 89 : 178A - 178A
  • [44] The Status of Positive Surgical Margin at Radical Prostatectomy and Risk of Biochemical Recurrence: A Single Institution Experience
    Li, M.
    Song, J.
    Shikanov, S.
    Eggnener, S.
    Shalhav, A.
    Taxy, J.
    Al-Ahmadie, H.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2009, 22 : 178A - 178A
  • [45] The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy
    Evren, Ismail
    Haciislamoglu, Ahmet
    Eksi, Mithat
    Yavuzsan, Abdullah Hizir
    Baytekin, Firat
    Colakoglu, Yunus
    Canoglu, Didem
    Tugcu, Volkan
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2019, 45 (01): : 45 - 53
  • [46] THE EFFECT OF CRIBRIFORM PATTERN ON ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES IN SURGICAL MARGIN POSITIVE PATIENTS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Deger, Mutlu
    Aydamirov, Mubariz
    Akdogan, Nebil
    Yilmaz, Ismail Onder
    Erdogan, Seyda
    Bayazit, Yildirim
    Izol, Volkan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E950 - E951
  • [47] The positive surgical margin (SM) is no independent predictor for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RRP)
    Palisaar, RJ
    Noldus, J
    Haese, A
    Graefen, M
    Huland, H
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 182 - 182
  • [48] Long-Term Oncological Impact of Positive Anterior Surgical Margin after Radical Prostatectomy
    Lu, Min
    Wu, Shulin
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2020, 100 (SUPPL 1) : 925 - 925
  • [49] Temporal Relationship Between Positive Margin Rate After Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and Surgical Training
    Page, Jay B.
    Davenport, Daniel L.
    Unnikrishnan, Raman
    Crispen, Paul L.
    Venkatesh, Ramakrishna
    Strup, Stephen E.
    UROLOGY, 2011, 77 (03) : 626 - 630
  • [50] IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL ERG STATUS IS NOT PREDICTIVE FOR BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY WITH POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN
    Rennau, Michael Ladurner
    Klocker, Helmut
    Heidegger, Isabel
    Skardski, Viktor
    Schaefer, Georg
    Horninger, Wolfgang
    Bektic, Jasmin
    Bektic, Jasmin
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E611 - E611