An MRI-based grading system for preoperative risk estimation of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy

被引:3
|
作者
Xu, Lili [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Gumuyang [1 ]
Zhang, Daming [1 ]
Zhang, Jiahui [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoxiao [1 ]
Bai, Xin [1 ]
Chen, Li [1 ]
Peng, Qianyu [1 ]
Xiao, Yu [3 ]
Wang, Hao [3 ]
Jin, Zhengyu [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Hao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, State Key Lab Complex Severe & Rare Dis, Dept Radiol, 1 Shuaifuyuan,Wangfujing St, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Ctr Qual Control Radiol, 1 Shuaifuyuan,Wangfujing St, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Pathol, 1 Shuaifuyuan,Wangfujing St, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Margins of excision; Risk assessment; CANCER; RADIOMICS; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1186/s13244-023-01516-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective To construct a simplified grading system based on MRI features to predict positive surgical margin (PSM) after radical prostatectomy (RP).Methods Patients who had undergone prostate MRI followed by RP between January 2017 and January 2021 were retrospectively enrolled as the derivation group, and those between February 2021 and November 2022 were enrolled as the validation group. One radiologist evaluated tumor-related MRI features, including the capsule contact length (CCL) of lesions, frank extraprostatic extension (EPE), apex abutting, etc. Binary logistic regression and decision tree analysis were used to select risk features for PSM. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of different systems were calculated. The interreader agreement of the scoring systems was evaluated using the kappa statistic.Results There were 29.8% (42/141) and 36.4% (32/88) of patients who had PSM in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. The first grading system was proposed (mrPSM1) using two imaging features, namely, CCL >= 20 mm and apex abutting, and then updated by adding frank EPE (mrPSM2). In the derivation group, the AUC was 0.705 for mrPSM1 and 0.713 for mrPSM2. In the validation group, our grading systems showed comparable AUC with Park et al.'s model (0.672-0.686 vs. 0.646, p > 0.05) and significantly higher specificity (0.732-0.750 vs. 0.411, p < 0.001). The kappa value was 0.764 for mrPSM1 and 0.776 for mrPSM2. Decision curve analysis showed a higher net benefit for mrPSM2.Conclusion The proposed grading systems based on MRI could benefit the risk stratification of PSM and are easily interpretable.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN IN THE RETROPUBIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: OUR EXPERIENCE
    Zambito, Stefano
    Albo, Giancarlo
    Ambruosi, Carlo
    Scardino, Epifanio
    De Cobelli, Ottavio
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 30 (04) : 1529 - 1530
  • [32] PREDICTORS OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN IN ROBOTIC ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Boylu, U.
    Pinsky, M.
    Lee, B.
    Thomas, R.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 : A88 - A89
  • [33] Surgical margin status after radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Khan, MA
    Partin, AW
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 95 (03) : 281 - 284
  • [34] Re: Tumour Location Determined by Preoperative MRI is an Independent Predictor for Positive Surgical Margin Status after Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (02): : 611 - 611
  • [35] Preoperative multiparametric MRI does not lower positive surgical margin rate in a large series of patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    L. Gietelink
    B. H. E. Jansen
    D. E. Oprea-Lager
    J. A. Nieuwenhuijzen
    A. N. Vis
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 16 : 273 - 278
  • [36] Preoperative multiparametric MRI does not lower positive surgical margin rate in a large series of patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Gietelink, L.
    Jansen, B. H. E.
    Oprea-Lager, D. E.
    Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A.
    Vis, A. N.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (02) : 273 - 278
  • [37] Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy
    Galetti, Tommaso Prayer
    Cattaneo, Francesco
    Coati, Irena
    Gardiman, Marina
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2014, 81 (01) : 16 - 24
  • [38] Risk of recurrence in patients with positive surgical margin at apex only versus other locations after radical prostatectomy.
    Kato, Masashi
    Yamamoto, Akiyuki
    Ishida, Ryo
    Kimura, Tohru
    Sano, Tomoyasu
    Owaki, Takayuki
    Sassa, Naoto
    Gotoh, Momokazu
    Tsuzuki, Toyonori
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (07)
  • [39] A Comprehensive Analysis of the Association Between Gleason Score at a Positive Surgical Margin and the Risk of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
    Iremashvili, Viacheslav
    Pelaez, Liset
    Jorda, Merce
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    Punnen, Sanoj
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2019, 43 (03) : 369 - 373
  • [40] Risk classification system using the detailed positive surgical margin status for predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Hatayama, Tomoya
    Goto, Keisuke
    Fujiyama, Kenta
    Goriki, Akihiro
    Kaneko, Mayumi
    Mita, Koji
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 21 (02) : 156 - 162