Fertility preservation after gonadotoxic treatments for cancer and autoimmune diseases

被引:2
|
作者
Saito, Saki [1 ]
Yamada, Mitsutoshi [1 ]
Yano, Rika [2 ]
Takahashi, Kazuko [2 ]
Ebara, Akiko [2 ]
Sakanaka, Hiroe [2 ]
Matsumoto, Miho [3 ]
Ishimaru, Tomoko [3 ]
Utsuno, Hiroki [3 ]
Matsuzawa, Yuichi [1 ]
Ooka, Reina [1 ]
Fukuoka, Mio [1 ]
Akashi, Kazuhiro [1 ]
Kamijo, Shintaro [1 ]
Hamatani, Toshio [1 ]
Tanaka, Mamoru [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, 35 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[2] Keio Univ Hosp, Dept Nursing, 35 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[3] Keio Univ Hosp, Clin Lab, 35 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
关键词
Cancer; Autoimmune disease; Fertility preservation; Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue; Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation; Female infertility; Cryopreservation; Oocyte quality; Embryo quality; Remission; OVARIAN STIMULATION; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; PREGNANCY; WOMEN; RISK; RECOMMENDATIONS; MATURATION; HORMONE; SOCIETY; IVF;
D O I
10.1186/s13048-023-01250-x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe indications for fertility preservation (FP) have expanded. A few patients who underwent gonadotoxic treatment did not have the opportunity to receive FP, leading to concerns that these patients may develop premature ovarian insufficiency. However, the usefulness of FP in women with reduced ovarian reserve has also been questioned. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation can improve the controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol, but there is limited data on the efficacy of FP with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation.MethodsWe conducted a prospective study of 43 women with cancer or autoimmune diseases before and after gonadotoxic treatment at the reproductive unit of Keio University Hospital, counselled between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021. After counselling, informed consent was obtained for FP from 43 patients, with those who underwent gonadotoxic treatment of the primary disease being prioritised. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue or progestin was used to suppress luteinising hormone in COS before or after gonadotoxic treatment. The number of cryopreserved mature oocytes was the primary outcome.ResultsForty-three patients and 67 assisted reproductive technology cycles were included in the analysis. The median age at entry was 32 [inter quartile range (IQR), 29-37] years. All patients in the post-gonadotoxic treatment group had their oocytes frozen. Gonadotoxic treatment resulted in fewer oocytes [median 3 (IQR 1-4); pre-gonadotoxic treatment group: five patients, 13 cycles] vs. median 9 (IQR 5-14; pre-gonadotoxic treatment group: 38 patients, 54 cycles; P < 0.001). Although anti-Mullerian hormone levels were lower in the post-gonadotoxic treatment group (n = 5, 13 cycles, median 0.29 (IQR 0.15-1.04) pg/mL) than in the pre-gonadotoxic treatment group (n = 38, 54 cycles, median 1.89 (IQR 1.15-4.08) pg/mL) (P = 0.004), oocyte maturation rates were higher in the post-gonadotoxic treatment group [median 100 (IQR 77.5-100) %] than in the pre-gonadotoxic group [median 90.3 (IQR 75.0-100) %; P = 0.039]. Five patients in the pre-gonadotoxic treatment group had their cryopreserved embryos thawed, of which three had live births.ConclusionsOocytes obtained for FP from women with cancer or autoimmune disease for FP are of satisfactory quality, regardless of whether they are obtained post-gonadotoxic treatment or COS protocols.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Which patients pursue fertility preservation treatments? A multicenter analysis of the predictors of fertility preservation in women with breast cancer
    Kim, Jayeon
    Oktay, Kutluk
    Gracia, Clarisa
    Lee, Sanghoon
    Morse, Christopher
    Mersereau, Jennifer E.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2012, 97 (03) : 671 - 676
  • [42] Fertility Preservation After Breast Cancer Diagnosis
    Slomski, Anita
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 328 (13): : 1289 - 1289
  • [43] Fertility after Childhood Cancer and Preservation Methods
    Borgmann-Staudt, A.
    Pfitzer, C.
    KLINISCHE PADIATRIE, 2012, 224 (02): : 116 - 116
  • [44] Predictive factors for fertility preservation in pediatric and adolescent girls with planned gonadotoxic treatment
    Glory E. Mgboji
    Christina N. Cordeiro Mitchell
    Bronwyn S. Bedrick
    Dhananjay Vaidya
    Xueting Tao
    Yisi Liu
    Jacqueline Y. Maher
    Mindy S. Christianson
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2021, 38 : 2713 - 2721
  • [45] Opening Doors: Fertility Preservation for Adolescents and Young Adults Facing Gonadotoxic Therapy
    Constance, Elizabeth S.
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2020, 34 (11): : 500 - 501
  • [46] Fertility counseling and preservation practices in youth with lupus and vasculitis undergoing gonadotoxic therapy
    Nahata, Leena
    Sivaraman, Vidya
    Quinn, Gwendolyn P.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (06) : 1470 - 1474
  • [47] Patient decision-making in female fertility preservation prior to gonadotoxic therapy
    Baysal, O.
    Bastings, L.
    Beerendonk, C. C. M.
    Postma, S. A. E.
    IntHout, J.
    Verhaak, C. M.
    Braat, D. D. M.
    Nelen, W. L. D. M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 : 346 - 346
  • [48] PREDICTIVE FACTORS FOR FERTILITY PRESERVATION IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH PLANNED GONADOTOXIC TREATMENT.
    Mgboji, Glory E.
    Mitchell, Christina N.
    Christianson, Mindy S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (03) : E67 - E68
  • [49] Cancer and fertility preservation: fertility preservation in breast cancer patients
    Maltaris, Theodoros
    Weigel, Michael
    Mueller, Andreas
    Schmidt, Marcus
    Seufert, Rudolf
    Fischl, Franz
    Koelbl, Heinz
    Dittrich, Ralf
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (02):
  • [50] Thirteen years' experience in fertility preservation for cancer patients after in vitro fertilization and in vitro maturation treatments
    Creux, Helene
    Monnier, Patricia
    Son, Weon-Young
    Buckett, William
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2018, 35 (04) : 583 - 592