Fertility preservation after gonadotoxic treatments for cancer and autoimmune diseases

被引:2
|
作者
Saito, Saki [1 ]
Yamada, Mitsutoshi [1 ]
Yano, Rika [2 ]
Takahashi, Kazuko [2 ]
Ebara, Akiko [2 ]
Sakanaka, Hiroe [2 ]
Matsumoto, Miho [3 ]
Ishimaru, Tomoko [3 ]
Utsuno, Hiroki [3 ]
Matsuzawa, Yuichi [1 ]
Ooka, Reina [1 ]
Fukuoka, Mio [1 ]
Akashi, Kazuhiro [1 ]
Kamijo, Shintaro [1 ]
Hamatani, Toshio [1 ]
Tanaka, Mamoru [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, 35 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[2] Keio Univ Hosp, Dept Nursing, 35 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[3] Keio Univ Hosp, Clin Lab, 35 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
关键词
Cancer; Autoimmune disease; Fertility preservation; Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue; Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation; Female infertility; Cryopreservation; Oocyte quality; Embryo quality; Remission; OVARIAN STIMULATION; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; PREGNANCY; WOMEN; RISK; RECOMMENDATIONS; MATURATION; HORMONE; SOCIETY; IVF;
D O I
10.1186/s13048-023-01250-x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe indications for fertility preservation (FP) have expanded. A few patients who underwent gonadotoxic treatment did not have the opportunity to receive FP, leading to concerns that these patients may develop premature ovarian insufficiency. However, the usefulness of FP in women with reduced ovarian reserve has also been questioned. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation can improve the controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol, but there is limited data on the efficacy of FP with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation.MethodsWe conducted a prospective study of 43 women with cancer or autoimmune diseases before and after gonadotoxic treatment at the reproductive unit of Keio University Hospital, counselled between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021. After counselling, informed consent was obtained for FP from 43 patients, with those who underwent gonadotoxic treatment of the primary disease being prioritised. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue or progestin was used to suppress luteinising hormone in COS before or after gonadotoxic treatment. The number of cryopreserved mature oocytes was the primary outcome.ResultsForty-three patients and 67 assisted reproductive technology cycles were included in the analysis. The median age at entry was 32 [inter quartile range (IQR), 29-37] years. All patients in the post-gonadotoxic treatment group had their oocytes frozen. Gonadotoxic treatment resulted in fewer oocytes [median 3 (IQR 1-4); pre-gonadotoxic treatment group: five patients, 13 cycles] vs. median 9 (IQR 5-14; pre-gonadotoxic treatment group: 38 patients, 54 cycles; P < 0.001). Although anti-Mullerian hormone levels were lower in the post-gonadotoxic treatment group (n = 5, 13 cycles, median 0.29 (IQR 0.15-1.04) pg/mL) than in the pre-gonadotoxic treatment group (n = 38, 54 cycles, median 1.89 (IQR 1.15-4.08) pg/mL) (P = 0.004), oocyte maturation rates were higher in the post-gonadotoxic treatment group [median 100 (IQR 77.5-100) %] than in the pre-gonadotoxic group [median 90.3 (IQR 75.0-100) %; P = 0.039]. Five patients in the pre-gonadotoxic treatment group had their cryopreserved embryos thawed, of which three had live births.ConclusionsOocytes obtained for FP from women with cancer or autoimmune disease for FP are of satisfactory quality, regardless of whether they are obtained post-gonadotoxic treatment or COS protocols.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Female fertility preservation in autoimmune diseases: possibilities and practises in France
    Carre-Pigeon, F.
    Schubert, B.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2007, 35 (09): : 853 - 860
  • [22] Safety of fertility treatments in women with systemic autoimmune diseases (SADs)
    Vanni, V. S.
    De Lorenzo, R.
    Privitera, L.
    Canti, V
    Vigano, P.
    Rovere-Querini, P.
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 18 (09) : 841 - 852
  • [23] Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue as a method for fertility preservation of female patients with cancer- and autoimmune diseases
    Zervomanolakis, I
    Mattle, V
    Murach, K. F.
    Hofer, S.
    Wildt, L.
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2007, 67 (05) : 506 - 506
  • [24] Fertility preservation options before gonadotoxic antirheumatic treatment A review
    Edimiris, Philippos
    Kruessel, Jan-Steffen
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR RHEUMATOLOGIE, 2021, 80 (08): : 726 - 732
  • [25] Fertility preservation options for prepubertal boys facing gonadotoxic therapies
    Hussein, Hmed A.
    Yango, Pamela
    Ezz, Youseff
    Smith, James F.
    Tran, Nam D.
    MINERVA GINECOLOGICA, 2016, 68 (06): : 668 - 674
  • [26] Consequences of cancer treatments and fertility preservation: Report and propositions
    Hoog-Labouret, Natalie
    Merlet, Francoise
    ONCOLOGIE, 2013, 15 (05) : 263 - 270
  • [27] Testicular wedge biopsy for fertility preservation in children at significant risk for azoospermia after gonadotoxic therapy
    Corkum, Kristine S.
    Lautz, Timothy B.
    Johnson, Emilie K.
    Reimann, Molly B.
    Walz, Amy L.
    Lockart, Barbara A.
    Brannigan, Robert E.
    ValliPulaski, Hanna
    Orwig, Kyle E.
    Rowell, Erin E.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2019, 54 (09) : 1901 - 1905
  • [28] FERTILITY PRESERVATION IN FEMALE PEDIATRIC PATIENTS PRIOR TO GONADOTOXIC THERAPY: PREDICTIVE FACTORS FOR RECEIVING FERTILITY PRESERVATION TREATMENT
    Selter, J. H.
    Cordeiro, C. N.
    Chuong, F. S.
    Garcia, J. E.
    Kolp, L. A.
    Christianson, M. S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) : E266 - E266
  • [29] Fertility preservation for young patients with autoimmune diseases and the need for cytotoxic treatment
    Henes, M.
    Henes, J. C.
    Schmalzing, M.
    Neunhoeffer, E.
    Rothmund, R.
    Koetter, I.
    Lawrenz, B.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR RHEUMATOLOGIE, 2011, 70 (02): : 146 - +
  • [30] Fertility Preservation in Women After the Cancer
    Lappi, Michela
    Borini, Andrea
    CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2012, 18 (03) : 293 - 302