Fertility preservation after gonadotoxic treatments for cancer and autoimmune diseases

被引:2
|
作者
Saito, Saki [1 ]
Yamada, Mitsutoshi [1 ]
Yano, Rika [2 ]
Takahashi, Kazuko [2 ]
Ebara, Akiko [2 ]
Sakanaka, Hiroe [2 ]
Matsumoto, Miho [3 ]
Ishimaru, Tomoko [3 ]
Utsuno, Hiroki [3 ]
Matsuzawa, Yuichi [1 ]
Ooka, Reina [1 ]
Fukuoka, Mio [1 ]
Akashi, Kazuhiro [1 ]
Kamijo, Shintaro [1 ]
Hamatani, Toshio [1 ]
Tanaka, Mamoru [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, 35 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[2] Keio Univ Hosp, Dept Nursing, 35 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[3] Keio Univ Hosp, Clin Lab, 35 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
关键词
Cancer; Autoimmune disease; Fertility preservation; Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue; Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation; Female infertility; Cryopreservation; Oocyte quality; Embryo quality; Remission; OVARIAN STIMULATION; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; PREGNANCY; WOMEN; RISK; RECOMMENDATIONS; MATURATION; HORMONE; SOCIETY; IVF;
D O I
10.1186/s13048-023-01250-x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe indications for fertility preservation (FP) have expanded. A few patients who underwent gonadotoxic treatment did not have the opportunity to receive FP, leading to concerns that these patients may develop premature ovarian insufficiency. However, the usefulness of FP in women with reduced ovarian reserve has also been questioned. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation can improve the controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol, but there is limited data on the efficacy of FP with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation.MethodsWe conducted a prospective study of 43 women with cancer or autoimmune diseases before and after gonadotoxic treatment at the reproductive unit of Keio University Hospital, counselled between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021. After counselling, informed consent was obtained for FP from 43 patients, with those who underwent gonadotoxic treatment of the primary disease being prioritised. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue or progestin was used to suppress luteinising hormone in COS before or after gonadotoxic treatment. The number of cryopreserved mature oocytes was the primary outcome.ResultsForty-three patients and 67 assisted reproductive technology cycles were included in the analysis. The median age at entry was 32 [inter quartile range (IQR), 29-37] years. All patients in the post-gonadotoxic treatment group had their oocytes frozen. Gonadotoxic treatment resulted in fewer oocytes [median 3 (IQR 1-4); pre-gonadotoxic treatment group: five patients, 13 cycles] vs. median 9 (IQR 5-14; pre-gonadotoxic treatment group: 38 patients, 54 cycles; P < 0.001). Although anti-Mullerian hormone levels were lower in the post-gonadotoxic treatment group (n = 5, 13 cycles, median 0.29 (IQR 0.15-1.04) pg/mL) than in the pre-gonadotoxic treatment group (n = 38, 54 cycles, median 1.89 (IQR 1.15-4.08) pg/mL) (P = 0.004), oocyte maturation rates were higher in the post-gonadotoxic treatment group [median 100 (IQR 77.5-100) %] than in the pre-gonadotoxic group [median 90.3 (IQR 75.0-100) %; P = 0.039]. Five patients in the pre-gonadotoxic treatment group had their cryopreserved embryos thawed, of which three had live births.ConclusionsOocytes obtained for FP from women with cancer or autoimmune disease for FP are of satisfactory quality, regardless of whether they are obtained post-gonadotoxic treatment or COS protocols.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fertility preservation after gonadotoxic treatments for cancer and autoimmune diseases
    Saki Saito
    Mitsutoshi Yamada
    Rika Yano
    Kazuko Takahashi
    Akiko Ebara
    Hiroe Sakanaka
    Miho Matsumoto
    Tomoko Ishimaru
    Hiroki Utsuno
    Yuichi Matsuzawa
    Reina Ooka
    Mio Fukuoka
    Kazuhiro Akashi
    Shintaro Kamijo
    Toshio Hamatani
    Mamoru Tanaka
    Journal of Ovarian Research, 16
  • [2] Fertility preservation in patients receiving gonadotoxic therapies for systemic autoimmune diseases in Japan
    Tsuchida, Yumi
    Harada, Miyuki
    Shoda, Hirofumi
    Goto, Ayane
    Suzuki, Nao
    Murashima, Atsuko
    Osuga, Yutaka
    Fujio, Keishi
    MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 31 (05) : 1004 - 1009
  • [3] Combined Fertility Preservation Technique before Gonadotoxic Treatments in Cancer Patients
    Sacinti, Koray Gorkem
    Sukur, Yavuz Emre
    Sonmezer, Murat
    Atabekoglu, Cem Somer
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY, 2021, 15 (04) : 303 - 304
  • [4] Fertility preservation treatment for young women with autoimmune diseases facing treatment with gonadotoxic agents
    Elizur, S. E.
    Chian, R. C.
    Pineau, C. A.
    Son, W. Y.
    Holzer, H. E. G.
    Huang, J. Y. J.
    Gidoni, Y.
    Levin, D.
    Demirtas, E.
    Tan, S. L.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2008, 47 (10) : 1506 - 1509
  • [5] Fertility Preservation in Women With Malignant Tumors and Gonadotoxic Treatments
    von Wolff, Michael
    Dian, Darius
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (12): : 220 - 226
  • [6] Fertility Preservation Options After Gonadotoxic Chemotherapy
    Hyman, Jordana Hadassah
    Tulandi, Togas
    CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2013, 7 : 61 - 69
  • [7] Fertility preservation in boys facing gonadotoxic cancer therapy
    Christian F. S. Jensen
    Lihua Dong
    Murat Gul
    Mikkel Fode
    Simone Hildorf
    Jorgen Thorup
    Eva Hoffmann
    Dina Cortes
    Jens Fedder
    Claus Y. Andersen
    Jens Sønksen
    Nature Reviews Urology, 2022, 19 : 71 - 83
  • [8] Fertility preservation in reproductive-age women facing gonadotoxic treatments
    Roberts, J.
    Ronn, R.
    Tallon, N.
    Holzer, H.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (04) : E294 - E304
  • [9] Fertility preservation options prior to gonadotoxic cancer treatment
    Bilgicyildirim, Aysen
    Bratengeier, Jutta
    Engelskirchen-Amran, Hediel
    GYNAKOLOGIE, 2023, 56 (06): : 427 - 432
  • [10] Fertility preservation in boys facing gonadotoxic cancer therapy
    Jensen, Christian F. S.
    Dong, Lihua
    Gul, Murat
    Fode, Mikkel
    Hildorf, Simone
    Thorup, Jorgen
    Hoffmann, Eva
    Cortes, Dina
    Fedder, Jens
    Andersen, Claus Y.
    Sonksen, Jens
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2022, 19 (02) : 71 - 83