Differential diagnostic value of tumor markers and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma and gastric adenocarcinoma

被引:0
|
作者
Dong, Congsong [1 ]
Wang, Yanling [2 ]
Gu, Xiaoyu [3 ]
Lv, Xiaojing [3 ]
Ren, Shuai [3 ]
Wang, Zhongqiu [3 ]
Dai, Zhenyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Nantong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 6, Yancheng Peoples Hosp 3, Dept Radiol, Yancheng, Peoples R China
[2] Peoples Hosp Suzhou New Dist, Dept Radiol, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Radiol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
gastric cancer; hepatoid adenocarcinoma; a-fetoprotein (AFP); computed tomography; differential diagnosis; PROGNOSIS; RARE;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1222853
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of tumor markers and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) in differentiating gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma (GHA) from gastric adenocarcinoma (GA). Methods: This retrospective study included 160 patients (44 with GHA vs. 116 with GA) who underwent preoperative CE-CT. Preoperative serum concentrations of tumor biomarkers and CT imaging features were analyzed, including alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), tumor location, growth pattern, size, enhancement pattern, cystic changes, and mass contrast enhancement. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate useful tumor markers and CT imaging features for differentiating GHA from GA. Results: When compared to GA, GHA showed a higher serum AFP [13.27 ng/ml (5.2-340.1) vs. 2.7 ng/ml (2.2-3.98), P <0.001] and CEA levels [4.07 ng/ml (2.73-12.53) vs. 2.42 ng/ml (1.38-4.31), P <0.001]. CT imaging showed GHA with a higher frequency of tumor location in the gastric antrum (P <0.001). GHA had significantly lower attenuation values at the portal venous phase [PCA, (82.34 HU +/- 8.46 vs. 91.02 HU +/- 10.62, P <0.001)] and delayed phase [DCA, (72.89 HU +/- 8.83 vs. 78.27 HU +/- 9.51, P <0.001)] when compared with GA. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that tumor location, PCA, and serum AFP level were independent predictors of differentiation between GHA and GA. The combination of these three predictors performed well in discriminating GHA from GA, with an AUC of 0.903, a sensitivity of 86.36%, and a specificity of 81.90%. Conclusions: Integrated evaluation of tumor markers and CT features, including tumor location, PCA, and serum AFP, allowed for more accurate differentiation of GHA from GA.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography for differentiating mass-forming pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis
    Yang, Jie
    Huang, Jiayan
    Zhang, Yonggang
    Zeng, Keyu
    Liao, Min
    Jiang, Zhenpeng
    Bao, Wuyongga
    Lu, Qiang
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 136 (17) : 2028 - 2036
  • [42] Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Assessing the Vascularity of Liver Metastases Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography
    Zheng, Yan-Ling
    Yin, Xiao-Yu
    Xie, Xiao-Yan
    Xu, Hui-Xiong
    Xu, Zuo-Feng
    Liu, Guang-Jian
    Liang, Jin-Yu
    Lu, Ming-De
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (10) : 1403 - 1410
  • [43] Case Report: The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the diagnosis of hepatic angiosarcoma
    Wang, Feiqian
    Numata, Kazushi
    Liang, Hua
    Tsuchiya, Hiromi
    Ruan, Litao
    Tanabe, Mikiko
    Bai, Xiaofang
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [44] Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and Laboratory Parameters as Non-Invasive Diagnostic Markers of Pancreatic Fibrosis
    Khatkov, Igor E.
    Bordin, Dmitry S.
    Lesko, Konstantin A.
    Dubtsova, Elena A.
    Karnaukhov, Nikolay S.
    Kiriukova, Maria A.
    Makarenko, Nadezhda V.
    Dorofeev, Alexey S.
    Savina, Irina V.
    Salimgereeva, Diana A.
    Shurygina, Elena I.
    Vinokurova, Ludmila V.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (14)
  • [45] Differentiation of hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Ren, Shuai
    Chen, Xiao
    Wang, Zhonglan
    Zhao, Rui
    Wang, Jianhua
    Cui, Wenjing
    Wang, Zhongqiu
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (02):
  • [46] Individually Optimized Contrast-Enhanced 4-Dimensional Computed Tomography for Radiation Therapy Simulation in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
    Choi, W.
    Xue, M.
    Lane, B.
    Kang, M. K.
    Patel, K.
    Regine, W. F.
    Klahr, P.
    Wang, J.
    Chen, S.
    D'Souza, W. D.
    Lu, W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : E621 - E621
  • [47] Diffuse-type gastric cancer: specific enhancement pattern on multiphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Daisuke Tsurumaru
    Mitsutoshi Miyasaka
    Toshio Muraki
    Yoshiki Asayama
    Akihiro Nishie
    Eiji Oki
    Minako Hirahashi
    Tomoyuki Hida
    Hiroshi Honda
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2017, 35 : 289 - 295
  • [48] Enhancement Patterns in Differentiated and Undifferentiated Gastric Carcinoma: Multiphasic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Versus Histopathology
    Sangeetha, S.
    Sankaran, Rakesh
    Farid, Shaik
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [49] Double contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the preoperative gross classification of gastric cancer: a comparison with multidetector computed tomography
    He, Ping
    Zeng, Lan
    Miao, Liying
    Wang, Tianli
    Ye, Juxiang
    Meng, Lingmei
    Xue, Heng
    Zhang, Fan
    Zhao, Bo
    Ge, Huiyu
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [50] Accuracy of Intravenous Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Scan for the Diagnosis of Internal Hernia after Gastric Bypass
    Quezada, Nicolas
    Jones, Alex
    Marino, Carlo
    Hernandez, Julian
    Kuroiwa, Aron
    Escalona, Alex
    Perez, Gustavo
    Crovari, Fernando
    Funke, Ricardo
    Pimentel, Fernando
    Boza, Camilo
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2012, 22 (09) : 1411 - 1411