Differential diagnostic value of tumor markers and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma and gastric adenocarcinoma

被引:0
|
作者
Dong, Congsong [1 ]
Wang, Yanling [2 ]
Gu, Xiaoyu [3 ]
Lv, Xiaojing [3 ]
Ren, Shuai [3 ]
Wang, Zhongqiu [3 ]
Dai, Zhenyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Nantong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 6, Yancheng Peoples Hosp 3, Dept Radiol, Yancheng, Peoples R China
[2] Peoples Hosp Suzhou New Dist, Dept Radiol, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Radiol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
gastric cancer; hepatoid adenocarcinoma; a-fetoprotein (AFP); computed tomography; differential diagnosis; PROGNOSIS; RARE;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1222853
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of tumor markers and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) in differentiating gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma (GHA) from gastric adenocarcinoma (GA). Methods: This retrospective study included 160 patients (44 with GHA vs. 116 with GA) who underwent preoperative CE-CT. Preoperative serum concentrations of tumor biomarkers and CT imaging features were analyzed, including alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), tumor location, growth pattern, size, enhancement pattern, cystic changes, and mass contrast enhancement. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate useful tumor markers and CT imaging features for differentiating GHA from GA. Results: When compared to GA, GHA showed a higher serum AFP [13.27 ng/ml (5.2-340.1) vs. 2.7 ng/ml (2.2-3.98), P <0.001] and CEA levels [4.07 ng/ml (2.73-12.53) vs. 2.42 ng/ml (1.38-4.31), P <0.001]. CT imaging showed GHA with a higher frequency of tumor location in the gastric antrum (P <0.001). GHA had significantly lower attenuation values at the portal venous phase [PCA, (82.34 HU +/- 8.46 vs. 91.02 HU +/- 10.62, P <0.001)] and delayed phase [DCA, (72.89 HU +/- 8.83 vs. 78.27 HU +/- 9.51, P <0.001)] when compared with GA. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that tumor location, PCA, and serum AFP level were independent predictors of differentiation between GHA and GA. The combination of these three predictors performed well in discriminating GHA from GA, with an AUC of 0.903, a sensitivity of 86.36%, and a specificity of 81.90%. Conclusions: Integrated evaluation of tumor markers and CT features, including tumor location, PCA, and serum AFP, allowed for more accurate differentiation of GHA from GA.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enhancement parameters of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Correlation with pathologic grading
    Seo, Woorim
    Kim, Young Chul
    Min, Seon Jeong
    Lee, Sang Min
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 26 (28) : 4151 - 4158
  • [22] Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Is computed Tomography (CT) Useful in preoperative staging?
    Una Cidon, Esther
    Jimenez Cuenca, Isabel
    CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ONCOLOGY, 2009, 3 : 91 - 97
  • [23] The Diagnostic Value of Tumor Markers in Diagnosis of Pancreas Adenocarcinoma
    Kaya, Bulent
    Bat, Orhan
    Taskin, Ali Kemal
    KONURALP TIP DERGISI, 2014, 6 (01): : 70 - 73
  • [24] Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for diagnosing the intraductal component of breast cancer
    Sadako Akashi-Tanaka
    Takashi Fukutomi
    Kunihisa Miyakawa
    Nachiko Uchiyama
    Hitoshi Tsuda
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1998, 49 : 79 - 86
  • [25] Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for diagnosing the intraductal component of breast cancer
    Akashi-Tanaka, S
    Fukutomi, T
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON SENOLOGY - BREAST DISEASES OF THE SENOLOGIC INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY, 1998, : 587 - 591
  • [26] Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for diagnosing the intraductal component of breast cancer
    Akashi-Tanaka, S
    Fukutomi, T
    Miyakawa, K
    Uchiyama, N
    Tsuda, H
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1998, 49 (01) : 79 - 86
  • [27] Untargeted Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Versus Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Differential Diagnostic Performance (DDP) Study for Kidney Lesions
    Jin, Li
    Xie, Feng
    CLINICS, 2020, 75
  • [28] Diagnostic Efficacy of Dynamic Maneuver in Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Compared With Conventional Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography in Imaging the Neck Region
    Sanjaykanth, B.
    Sam, Ajina
    Gunasekaran, Dhivya
    Muralidharan, Yuvaraj
    Natarajan, Paarthipan
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [29] Diagnostic utility of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for ectopic pregnancy
    Iizuka, Takashi
    Yoshida, Kotaro
    Yamazaki, Rena
    Matsuoka, Ayumi
    Fujiwara, Hiroshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 167 (01) : 395 - 402
  • [30] Prognostic Value of Systemic Inflammatory Markers in Patients With Gastric Adenocarcinoma
    Abu-Shawer, Osama
    Alchirazi, Khaled Alsabbagh
    Almomani, Ashraf
    Onwuzo, Somtochukwu
    Alkhayyat, Motasem
    Qapaja, Thabet
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 117 (10): : S1131 - S1132