Differential diagnostic value of tumor markers and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma and gastric adenocarcinoma

被引:0
|
作者
Dong, Congsong [1 ]
Wang, Yanling [2 ]
Gu, Xiaoyu [3 ]
Lv, Xiaojing [3 ]
Ren, Shuai [3 ]
Wang, Zhongqiu [3 ]
Dai, Zhenyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Nantong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 6, Yancheng Peoples Hosp 3, Dept Radiol, Yancheng, Peoples R China
[2] Peoples Hosp Suzhou New Dist, Dept Radiol, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Radiol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
gastric cancer; hepatoid adenocarcinoma; a-fetoprotein (AFP); computed tomography; differential diagnosis; PROGNOSIS; RARE;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1222853
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of tumor markers and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) in differentiating gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma (GHA) from gastric adenocarcinoma (GA). Methods: This retrospective study included 160 patients (44 with GHA vs. 116 with GA) who underwent preoperative CE-CT. Preoperative serum concentrations of tumor biomarkers and CT imaging features were analyzed, including alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), tumor location, growth pattern, size, enhancement pattern, cystic changes, and mass contrast enhancement. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate useful tumor markers and CT imaging features for differentiating GHA from GA. Results: When compared to GA, GHA showed a higher serum AFP [13.27 ng/ml (5.2-340.1) vs. 2.7 ng/ml (2.2-3.98), P <0.001] and CEA levels [4.07 ng/ml (2.73-12.53) vs. 2.42 ng/ml (1.38-4.31), P <0.001]. CT imaging showed GHA with a higher frequency of tumor location in the gastric antrum (P <0.001). GHA had significantly lower attenuation values at the portal venous phase [PCA, (82.34 HU +/- 8.46 vs. 91.02 HU +/- 10.62, P <0.001)] and delayed phase [DCA, (72.89 HU +/- 8.83 vs. 78.27 HU +/- 9.51, P <0.001)] when compared with GA. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that tumor location, PCA, and serum AFP level were independent predictors of differentiation between GHA and GA. The combination of these three predictors performed well in discriminating GHA from GA, with an AUC of 0.903, a sensitivity of 86.36%, and a specificity of 81.90%. Conclusions: Integrated evaluation of tumor markers and CT features, including tumor location, PCA, and serum AFP, allowed for more accurate differentiation of GHA from GA.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gastric Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma: Differentiation From Gastric Adenocarcinoma With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic Findings
    Fu, Yi
    Zhu, Hui
    Peng, Wei-jun
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2019, 43 (06) : 887 - 891
  • [2] Gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma: A computed tomography report of six cases
    An Ren
    Feng Cai
    Yan-Ning Shang
    En-Sen Ma
    Zhen-Guo Huang
    Wu Wang
    Jie Luo
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, (40) : 15001 - 15006
  • [3] Gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma: A computed tomography report of six cases
    Ren, An
    Cai, Feng
    Shang, Yan-Ning
    Ma, En-Sen
    Huang, Zhen-Guo
    Wang, Wu
    Luo, Jie
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (40) : 15001 - 15006
  • [4] Gastric Ischemia Diagnosed by Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography
    Yamamoto, Kazuhiro
    Nishikawa, Jun
    Hamabe, Koichi
    Takami, Taro
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 61 (20) : 3143 - 3144
  • [5] The value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in predicting gastric cancer recurrence and metastasis
    Li, Chun-Feng
    Zheng, Jian
    Xue, Ying-Wei
    CANCER BIOMARKERS, 2017, 19 (03) : 327 - 333
  • [6] Combination of hepatocellular markers is useful for prognostication in gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma
    Osada, Mikako
    Aishima, Shinichi
    Hirahashi, Minako
    Takizawa, Nobuyoshi
    Takahashi, Shunsuke
    Nakamura, Kazuhiko
    Tanaka, Masao
    Maehara, Yoshihiko
    Takayanagi, Ryoichi
    Oda, Yoshinao
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2014, 45 (06) : 1243 - 1250
  • [7] Gastric large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus: the value of PET/CT and contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Song, Le
    Jin, Zhu
    Zhang, Weifang
    Zhang, Yanyan
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2015, 39 (02) : 325 - 328
  • [8] Differentiation of Gastric Schwannoma From Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor With Dual-Phase Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography
    Li, Ruimin
    Gan, Hualei
    Ni, Shujuan
    Fu, Yi
    Zhu, Hui
    Peng, Weijun
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2019, 43 (05) : 741 - 746
  • [9] Evaluation of recurrence in gastric carcinoma: Comparison of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography
    Jong Hyeon Kim
    Suk Hee Heo
    Jin Woong Kim
    Sang Soo Shin
    Jung Jun Min
    Seong Young Kwon
    Yong Yeon Jeong
    Heoung Keun Kang
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2017, (35) : 6448 - 6456
  • [10] Evaluation of recurrence in gastric carcinoma: Comparison of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography
    Kim, Jong Hyeon
    Heo, Suk Hee
    Kim, Jin Woong
    Shin, Sang Soo
    Min, Jung Jun
    Kwon, Seong Young
    Jeong, Yong Yeon
    Kang, Heoung Keun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 23 (35) : 6448 - 6456