BMP: An Evaluation System for Bitcoin Mining Pools

被引:1
|
作者
Guo, Xinwei [1 ]
Cui, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Automat Sci & Engn, Guangzhou 510641, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Data mining; Bitcoin; Blockchains; Stability criteria; Distribution networks; Carbon dioxide; Analytical models; Bitcoin miner; blockchain mining; evaluation model; transaction data; VISUAL ANALYTICS; BLOCKCHAIN; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1109/TCSS.2022.3172951
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
With the in-depth research and cross-domain applications of blockchain in various industries, blockchain mining attracts great attention. A comprehensive and in-depth evaluation of mining pool is essential to the Bitcoin network supervision as well as the reduction of carbon emission. However, due to the difficulty of obtaining mining pool internal data, the current evaluation is limited to a single mining power indicator. In this article, we build a four-layer mining pool evaluation model, named BMP, based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The model contains three first-level indicators and nine second-level indicators, covering various aspects of the performance of mining pool. Miner address extraction provides basic data for the calculation of these indicators. By utilizing the model proposed, we evaluated and ranked eight mainstream mining pools, which broadcasted 71.69% of the blocks during the period January 1, 2021-July 31, 2021. Through comparative analysis of evaluation result, we find that the 65% decline of mining power in June did not pose a threat to the stability of Bitcoin system. In addition, we also revealed the reasons for various fluctuations.
引用
收藏
页码:2636 / 2643
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Majority Is Not Enough: Bitcoin Mining Is Vulnerable
    Eyal, Ittay
    Sirer, Emin Guen
    [J]. FINANCIAL CRYPTOGRAPHY AND DATA SECURITY, FC 2014, 2014, 8437 : 436 - 454
  • [32] Spatial analysis of global Bitcoin mining
    Sun, Wei
    Jin, Haitao
    Jin, Fengjun
    Kong, Lingming
    Peng, Yihao
    Dai, Zhengjun
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [33] Selfish Mining and Defending Strategies in the Bitcoin
    Zhang, Weijian
    Wang, Hao
    Hua, Hao
    Wang, Qirun
    [J]. INTELLIGENT AUTOMATION AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 34 (03): : 1861 - 1875
  • [34] Bitcoin Block-Chain Mining
    Chadha, Gulpreet Kaur
    Singh, Archana
    [J]. 2019 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD COMPUTING, DATA SCIENCE & ENGINEERING (CONFLUENCE 2019), 2019, : 152 - 157
  • [35] Approaching an Optimal Bitcoin Mining Overlay
    Jiang, Suhan
    Wu, Jie
    [J]. IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, 2023, 31 (05) : 2013 - 2026
  • [36] On Detection of Bitcoin Mining Redirection Attacks
    Courtois, Nicolas T.
    Emirdag, Pinar
    Wang, Zhouyixing
    [J]. 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY AND PRIVACY (ICISSP), 2015, : 98 - 105
  • [37] A Cooperative Optimal Mining Model for Bitcoin
    Lajeunesse, David
    Scolnikt, Hugo D.
    [J]. 2021 3RD CONFERENCE ON BLOCKCHAIN RESEARCH & APPLICATIONS FOR INNOVATIVE NETWORKS AND SERVICES (BRAINS), 2021, : 209 - 216
  • [38] Rational mining limits Bitcoin emissions
    Nicolas Houy
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2019, 9 : 655 - 655
  • [39] Bitcoin mining built on shifting sands
    Kawecki, Maciej
    [J]. NATURE, 2018, 557 (7704) : 166 - 166
  • [40] Majority Is Not Enough: Bitcoin Mining Is Vulnerable
    Eyal, Ittay
    Sirer, Emin Gun
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2018, 61 (07) : 95 - 102