BMP: An Evaluation System for Bitcoin Mining Pools

被引:1
|
作者
Guo, Xinwei [1 ]
Cui, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Automat Sci & Engn, Guangzhou 510641, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Data mining; Bitcoin; Blockchains; Stability criteria; Distribution networks; Carbon dioxide; Analytical models; Bitcoin miner; blockchain mining; evaluation model; transaction data; VISUAL ANALYTICS; BLOCKCHAIN; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1109/TCSS.2022.3172951
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
With the in-depth research and cross-domain applications of blockchain in various industries, blockchain mining attracts great attention. A comprehensive and in-depth evaluation of mining pool is essential to the Bitcoin network supervision as well as the reduction of carbon emission. However, due to the difficulty of obtaining mining pool internal data, the current evaluation is limited to a single mining power indicator. In this article, we build a four-layer mining pool evaluation model, named BMP, based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The model contains three first-level indicators and nine second-level indicators, covering various aspects of the performance of mining pool. Miner address extraction provides basic data for the calculation of these indicators. By utilizing the model proposed, we evaluated and ranked eight mainstream mining pools, which broadcasted 71.69% of the blocks during the period January 1, 2021-July 31, 2021. Through comparative analysis of evaluation result, we find that the 65% decline of mining power in June did not pose a threat to the stability of Bitcoin system. In addition, we also revealed the reasons for various fluctuations.
引用
收藏
页码:2636 / 2643
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Rational Mining Of Bitcoin
    Pachal, Soumen
    Ruj, Sushmita
    [J]. 2019 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS & NETWORKS (COMSNETS), 2019, : 36 - 43
  • [22] The Bitcoin mining breakdown: Is mining still profitable?
    Delgado-Mohatar, Oscar
    Felis-Rota, Marta
    Fernandez-Herraiz, Carlos
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2019, 184
  • [23] Bitcoin Mining: Transition to Cloud
    Ramachandran, Hari Krishnan
    Saketh, Sai
    Vaibhav, Marichetty Venkata Teja
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLOUD APPLICATIONS AND COMPUTING, 2015, 5 (04) : 56 - 87
  • [24] On the insecurity of quantum Bitcoin mining
    Sattath, Or
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SECURITY, 2020, 19 (03) : 291 - 302
  • [25] Evaluation of hydrogen energy production of mining waste waters and pools
    Bilgin, Oyku
    [J]. 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS (ICRERA), 2015, : 557 - 561
  • [26] On the insecurity of quantum Bitcoin mining
    Or Sattath
    [J]. International Journal of Information Security, 2020, 19 : 291 - 302
  • [27] Power Adjusting and Bribery Racing: Novel Mining Attacks in the Bitcoin System
    Gao, Shang
    Li, Zecheng
    Peng, Zhe
    Xiao, Bin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 ACM SIGSAC CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (CCS'19), 2019, : 833 - 850
  • [28] Estimating the climate and health damages of Bitcoin mining in the US: Is Bitcoin underwater?
    Goodkind, Andrew L.
    Berrens, Robert P.
    Jones, Benjamin A.
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2024, 31 (06) : 555 - 560
  • [29] Conditions for advantageous quantum Bitcoin mining
    Nerem, Robert R.
    Gaur, Daya R.
    [J]. BLOCKCHAIN-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 4 (03):
  • [30] Spatial analysis of global Bitcoin mining
    Sun, Wei
    Jin, Haitao
    Jin, Fengjun
    Kong, Lingming
    Peng, Yihao
    Dai, Zhengjun
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)