Prognostic factors for favorable outcomes after veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in critical care patients with COVID-19

被引:2
|
作者
Kieninger, Barbel [1 ]
Kilger, Magdalena [2 ]
Foltan, Maik [3 ]
Gruber, Michael [2 ]
Lunz, Dirk [2 ]
Dienemann, Thomas [4 ]
Schmid, Stephan [5 ]
Graf, Bernhard [2 ]
Wiest, Clemens [6 ]
Lubnow, Matthias [6 ]
Mueller, Thomas [6 ]
Salzberger, Bernd [1 ]
Schneider-Brachert, Wulf [1 ]
Kieninger, Martin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Regensburg, Dept Infect Prevent & Infect Dis, Regensburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Regensburg, Dept Anesthesiol, Regensburg, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Regensburg, Dept Cardiac Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Regensburg, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr Regensburg, Dept Surg, Regensburg, Germany
[5] Univ Med Ctr Regensburg, Dept Internal Med 1, Regensburg, Germany
[6] Univ Med Ctr Regensburg, Dept Internal Med 2, Regensburg, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0280502
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundPatients with COVID-19 and severe acute respiratory failure may require veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO). Yet, this procedure is resource-intensive and high mortality rates have been reported. Thus, predictors for identifying patients who will benefit from VV ECMO would be helpful. MethodsThis retrospective study included 129 patients with COVID-19 and severe acute respiratory failure, who had received VV ECMO at the University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany, between 1 March 2020 and 31 December 2021. Patient-specific factors and relevant intensive-care parameters at the time of the decision to start VV ECMO were investigated regarding their value as predictors of patient survival. In addition, the intensive-care course of the first 10 days of VV ECMO was compared between survivors and patients who had died in the intensive care unit. ResultsThe most important parameters for predicting outcome were patient age and platelet count, which differed significantly between survivors and non-survivors (age: 52.6 +/- 8.1 vs. 57.4 +/- 10.1 years, p<0.001; platelet count before VV ECMO: 321.3 +/- 132.2 vs. 262.0 +/- 121.0 /nL, p = 0.006; average on day 10: 199.2 +/- 88.0 vs. 147.1 +/- 57.9 /nL, p = 0.002). A linear regression model derived from parameters collected before the start of VV ECMO only included age and platelet count. Patients were divided into two groups by using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis: group 1: 78% of patients, mortality 26%; group 2: 22% of patients, mortality 75%. A second linear regression model included average blood pH, minimum paO2, and average pump flow on day 10 of VV ECMO in addition to age and platelet count. The ROC curve resulted in two cut-off values and thus in three groups: group 1: 25% of patients, mortality 93%; group 2: 45% of patients, mortality 31%; group 3: 30% of patients, mortality 0%.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Characteristics and Outcomes of COVID-19 Patients Supported by Venoarterial or Veno-Arterial-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
    Haroun, Magued W.
    Patel, Snehal R.
    Sims, Daniel B.
    Jorde, Ulrich P.
    Goldstein, Daniel J.
    Saeed, Omar
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2022, 36 (08) : 2935 - 2941
  • [42] Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the third millennium
    Franchineau, Guillaume
    Schmidt, Matthieu
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 : S592 - S595
  • [43] Prone position ventilation and femoro-femoral veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19 treatment
    Maeda, Akiko
    Nabeya, Daijiro
    Nagano, Hiroaki
    Yagi, Nobuhito
    Miyagi, Tadayoshi
    Kishaba, Tomoo
    RESPIROLOGY CASE REPORTS, 2021, 9 (01):
  • [44] Decreased PRESET-Score corresponds with improved survival in COVID-19 veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
    Powell, Elizabeth K.
    Lankford, Allison S.
    Ghneim, Mira
    Rabin, Joseph
    Haase, Daniel J.
    Dahi, Siamak
    Deatrick, Kristopher B.
    Krause, Eric
    Bittle, Gregory
    Galvagno, Samuel M., Jr.
    Scalea, Thomas
    Tabatabai, Ali
    PERFUSION-UK, 2023, 38 (08): : 1623 - 1630
  • [45] Long Term Application of Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19 Respiratory Failure at a Single Institution
    Manahan, Genevieve
    D'Attellis, Nicola
    Rampolla, Reinaldo
    Catarino, Pedro
    Megna, Dominick
    Emerson, Dominic
    Granflor, Eliza
    Chan, Alice
    Nassem, Tariq
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2022, 134 : 215 - 215
  • [46] Anticoagulation and Antithrombin in Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
    Massicotte, M. Patricia
    Bauman, Mary E.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 132 (03) : 421 - 423
  • [47] VENO-VENOUS EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION - REPLY
    HOPKINSON, RB
    CARNIE, J
    ANAESTHESIA, 1982, 37 (04) : 474 - 474
  • [48] Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: cannulation techniques
    Banfi, Carlo
    Pozzi, Matteo
    Siegenthaler, Nils
    Brunner, Marie-Eve
    Tassaux, Didier
    Obadia, Jean-Francois
    Bendjelid, Karim
    Giraud, Raphel
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2016, 8 (12) : 3762 - 3773
  • [49] Characteristics of delirium and its association with sedation and in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
    Sun, Philip Young-woo
    Fanning, Jonathon
    Peeler, Anna
    Shou, Benjamin
    Lindsley, John
    Caturegli, Giorgio
    Whitman, Glenn
    Cha, Stephanie
    Kim, Bo Soo
    Cho, Sung-Min
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [50] Establishment of a Disaster Management-like System for COVID-19 Patients Requiring Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Japan
    Ogura, Takayuki
    Ohshimo, Shinichiro
    Liu, Keibun
    Iwashita, Yoshiaki
    Hashimoto, Satoru
    Takeda, Shinhiro
    MEMBRANES, 2021, 11 (08)