Prognostic factors for favorable outcomes after veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in critical care patients with COVID-19

被引:2
|
作者
Kieninger, Barbel [1 ]
Kilger, Magdalena [2 ]
Foltan, Maik [3 ]
Gruber, Michael [2 ]
Lunz, Dirk [2 ]
Dienemann, Thomas [4 ]
Schmid, Stephan [5 ]
Graf, Bernhard [2 ]
Wiest, Clemens [6 ]
Lubnow, Matthias [6 ]
Mueller, Thomas [6 ]
Salzberger, Bernd [1 ]
Schneider-Brachert, Wulf [1 ]
Kieninger, Martin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Regensburg, Dept Infect Prevent & Infect Dis, Regensburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Regensburg, Dept Anesthesiol, Regensburg, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Regensburg, Dept Cardiac Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Regensburg, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr Regensburg, Dept Surg, Regensburg, Germany
[5] Univ Med Ctr Regensburg, Dept Internal Med 1, Regensburg, Germany
[6] Univ Med Ctr Regensburg, Dept Internal Med 2, Regensburg, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0280502
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundPatients with COVID-19 and severe acute respiratory failure may require veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO). Yet, this procedure is resource-intensive and high mortality rates have been reported. Thus, predictors for identifying patients who will benefit from VV ECMO would be helpful. MethodsThis retrospective study included 129 patients with COVID-19 and severe acute respiratory failure, who had received VV ECMO at the University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany, between 1 March 2020 and 31 December 2021. Patient-specific factors and relevant intensive-care parameters at the time of the decision to start VV ECMO were investigated regarding their value as predictors of patient survival. In addition, the intensive-care course of the first 10 days of VV ECMO was compared between survivors and patients who had died in the intensive care unit. ResultsThe most important parameters for predicting outcome were patient age and platelet count, which differed significantly between survivors and non-survivors (age: 52.6 +/- 8.1 vs. 57.4 +/- 10.1 years, p<0.001; platelet count before VV ECMO: 321.3 +/- 132.2 vs. 262.0 +/- 121.0 /nL, p = 0.006; average on day 10: 199.2 +/- 88.0 vs. 147.1 +/- 57.9 /nL, p = 0.002). A linear regression model derived from parameters collected before the start of VV ECMO only included age and platelet count. Patients were divided into two groups by using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis: group 1: 78% of patients, mortality 26%; group 2: 22% of patients, mortality 75%. A second linear regression model included average blood pH, minimum paO2, and average pump flow on day 10 of VV ECMO in addition to age and platelet count. The ROC curve resulted in two cut-off values and thus in three groups: group 1: 25% of patients, mortality 93%; group 2: 45% of patients, mortality 31%; group 3: 30% of patients, mortality 0%.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transfer of Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients With COVID-19 Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    Mang, Sebastian
    Reichert, Lena
    Muellenbach, Ralf M.
    Riesner, Jonathan
    Lotz, Christopher
    Supady, Alexander
    Mutlak, Haitham
    Bals, Robert
    Rixecker, Torben M.
    Becker, Andre P.
    Leitner, Maximilian
    Zeiner, Carsten
    Danziger, Guy
    Meybohm, Patrick
    Seiler, Frederik
    Lepper, Philipp M.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2023, 69 (08) : 789 - 794
  • [22] ECMO cannulation for COVID-19 Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19: impact of cannulation strategy on outcome
    Immohr, Moritz Benjamin
    Hettlich, Vincent
    Brandenburger, Timo
    Kindgen-Milles, Detlef
    Feldt, Torsten
    Tudorache, Igor
    Akhyari, Payam
    Aubin, Hug
    Dalyanoglu, Hannan
    Lichtenberg, Artur
    Boeken, Udo
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HERZ THORAX UND GEFASSCHIRURGIE, 2022, 36 (04): : 255 - 259
  • [23] Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in COVID-19-Where Are We Now?
    Putowski, Zbigniew
    Szczepanska, Anna
    Czok, Marcelina
    Krzych, Lukasz J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (03) : 1 - 13
  • [24] VENO-VENOUS EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION
    BAILEY, JS
    REEVES, RA
    WYATT, R
    ANAESTHESIA, 1982, 37 (04) : 473 - 474
  • [25] Ambulatory veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
    Lindholm, Jonas Andersson
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 : S670 - S673
  • [26] Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in a Mouse
    Madrahimov, Nodir
    Khalikov, Abdurasul
    Boyle, Erin C.
    Natanov, Ruslan
    Knoefel, Ann-Kathrin
    Siemeni, Thierry
    Hoeffler, Klaus
    Haverich, Axel
    Maus, Ulrich
    Kuehn, Christian
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2018, (140):
  • [27] Cannulation for veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
    Lindholm, Jonas Andersson
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 : S606 - S612
  • [28] Peripartum veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with severe CoViD-19-related-ARDS
    Kakar, Vivek
    Ahmed, Ihab
    Ahmed, Walid
    Raposo, Nuno
    Kumar, G. Praveen
    PERFUSION-UK, 2024, 39 (02): : 426 - 432
  • [29] Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in COVID-19 Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Initial Experience
    Loforte, Antonio
    Dal Checco, Erika
    Gliozzi, Gregorio
    Benedetto, Maria
    Cavalli, Giulio Giovanni
    Mariani, Carlo
    Piccone, Giulia
    Agulli, Marta
    Pacini, Davide
    Baiocchi, Massimo
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2020, 66 (07) : 734 - 738
  • [30] Detection of Iliopsoas Hematoma by Retrospective Radiography in Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for a COVID-19 Patient
    Ohta, Soichi
    Takahashi, Kohei
    Iwashita, Masayuki
    Abe, Takeru
    Takeuchi, Ichiro
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (02)