Revisiting the impact of Health at Every Size® interventions on health and cardiometabolic related outcomes: An updated systematic review with meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Clarke, Erin D. [1 ,2 ]
Stanford, Jordan [1 ,2 ]
Gomez-Martin, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Collins, Clare E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Coll Hlth Med & Wellbeing, Sch Hlth Sci, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[2] Hunter Med Res Inst, Food & Nutr Res Program, New Lambton Hts, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Adv Technol Ctr, Room 310,Univ Dr, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
HAES; health at every size; obesity; overweight; systematic review; EATING BEHAVIORS; WEIGHT-LOSS; HIGH BMI; WOMEN; OBESE; MINDFULNESS; ACCEPTANCE; MANAGEMENT; FITNESS; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/1747-0080.12869
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Aims: To (1) synthesise evidence from Health at Every Size (R) interventions on physical and psychological health in people with overweight and obesity and (2) report between-group differences within interventions evaluating the impact of Health at Every Size (R) interventions on health and health-related outcomes. Methods: Six databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Scopus) were searched from inception until November 2022. Included studies were conducted in adults with overweight or obesity, used Health at Every Size (R)-based interventions compared with control interventions and reported dietary, physical and/or psychological outcomes, including diet quality, anthropometry, or quality of life. Data on between-group differences were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB2. Random-effects meta-analyses were undertaken for outcomes with at least three studies reporting the same or comparable data. Results: From 128 studies identified, 19 full-text articles (10 unique studies, 6 published since 2017), were included. Meta-analysis found a significant reduction for susceptibility to hunger in Health at Every Size (R) intervention groups relative to controls (p = 0.005), with no significant difference (p > 0.05) between Health at Every Size (R) interventions and control groups for anthropometric, psychological or cardiometabolic outcomes (total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, systolic or diastolic blood pressure). Conclusion: Health at Every Size (R) interventions had similar results compared with weight-based interventions on anthropometric outcomes and cardiometabolic outcomes. Health at Every Size (R) interventions had a significant benefit for reducing susceptibility to hunger. The decision to use a Health at Every Size (R)-based intervention should be personalised to individual needs. Further research in more diverse populations is required using standardised outcome measures to facilitate future meta-analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 282
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of weight cycling on health outcomes in animal models: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Thillainadesan, Senthil
    Madsen, Soren
    James, David E.
    Hocking, Samantha L.
    [J]. OBESITY REVIEWS, 2022, 23 (05)
  • [42] Mental health interventions by lay counsellors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Connolly, Suzanne M.
    Vanchu-Orosco, Michelle
    Warner, Jan
    Seidi, Pegah A.
    Edwards, Jenny
    Boath, Elisabeth
    Irgens, A. C.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2021, 99 (08) : 572 - 582
  • [43] Impact of adult weight management interventions on mental health: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
    Jones, Rebecca A.
    Lawlor, Emma R.
    Griffin, Simon J.
    van Sluijs, Esther M. F.
    Ahern, Amy L.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (01):
  • [44] Impact of Internet-Based Interventions on Caregiver Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sherifali, Diana
    Ali, Muhammad Usman
    Ploeg, Jenny
    Markle-Reid, Maureen
    Valaitis, Ruta
    Bartholomew, Amy
    Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Donna
    McAiney, Carrie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (07)
  • [45] Impact of dementia literacy interventions for non-health-professionals: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hoang Nguyen
    Phan, Hoang T.
    Terry, Daniel
    Doherty, Kathleen
    McInerney, Fran
    [J]. AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2022, 26 (03) : 442 - 456
  • [46] The role and impact of community health workers in childhood obesity interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Schroeder, K.
    McCormick, R.
    Perez, A.
    Lipman, T. H.
    [J]. OBESITY REVIEWS, 2018, 19 (10) : 1371 - 1384
  • [47] Impact of digital interventions and online health communities in patient activation: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abdelraheem, Omnia
    Salama, Mohamed
    Chun, Sungsoo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 188
  • [48] The impact of adult behavioural weight management interventions on mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jones, Rebecca A.
    Lawlor, Emma R.
    Birch, Jack M.
    Patel, Manal I.
    Werneck, Andre O.
    Hoare, Erin
    Griffin, Simon J.
    van Sluijs, Esther M. F.
    Sharp, Stephen J.
    Ahern, Amy L.
    [J]. OBESITY REVIEWS, 2021, 22 (04)
  • [49] Unveiling the impact of digital health interventions in coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Safeer, Mohammed V. S.
    Madkaiker, Navmi
    Bansal, Dipika
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2023, 32 : 383 - 383
  • [50] E-Mental Health Interventions for the Treatment and Prevention of Eating Disorders: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Linardon, Jake
    Shatte, Adrian
    Messer, Mariel
    Firth, Joseph
    Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 88 (11) : 994 - 1007