Revisiting the impact of Health at Every Size® interventions on health and cardiometabolic related outcomes: An updated systematic review with meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Clarke, Erin D. [1 ,2 ]
Stanford, Jordan [1 ,2 ]
Gomez-Martin, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Collins, Clare E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Coll Hlth Med & Wellbeing, Sch Hlth Sci, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[2] Hunter Med Res Inst, Food & Nutr Res Program, New Lambton Hts, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Adv Technol Ctr, Room 310,Univ Dr, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
HAES; health at every size; obesity; overweight; systematic review; EATING BEHAVIORS; WEIGHT-LOSS; HIGH BMI; WOMEN; OBESE; MINDFULNESS; ACCEPTANCE; MANAGEMENT; FITNESS; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/1747-0080.12869
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Aims: To (1) synthesise evidence from Health at Every Size (R) interventions on physical and psychological health in people with overweight and obesity and (2) report between-group differences within interventions evaluating the impact of Health at Every Size (R) interventions on health and health-related outcomes. Methods: Six databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Scopus) were searched from inception until November 2022. Included studies were conducted in adults with overweight or obesity, used Health at Every Size (R)-based interventions compared with control interventions and reported dietary, physical and/or psychological outcomes, including diet quality, anthropometry, or quality of life. Data on between-group differences were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB2. Random-effects meta-analyses were undertaken for outcomes with at least three studies reporting the same or comparable data. Results: From 128 studies identified, 19 full-text articles (10 unique studies, 6 published since 2017), were included. Meta-analysis found a significant reduction for susceptibility to hunger in Health at Every Size (R) intervention groups relative to controls (p = 0.005), with no significant difference (p > 0.05) between Health at Every Size (R) interventions and control groups for anthropometric, psychological or cardiometabolic outcomes (total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, systolic or diastolic blood pressure). Conclusion: Health at Every Size (R) interventions had similar results compared with weight-based interventions on anthropometric outcomes and cardiometabolic outcomes. Health at Every Size (R) interventions had a significant benefit for reducing susceptibility to hunger. The decision to use a Health at Every Size (R)-based intervention should be personalised to individual needs. Further research in more diverse populations is required using standardised outcome measures to facilitate future meta-analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 282
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Social network interventions for health behaviours and outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hunter, Ruth F.
    de la Haye, Kayla
    Murray, Jennifer M.
    Badham, Jennifer
    Valente, Thomas W.
    Clarke, Mike
    Kee, Frank
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2019, 16 (09)
  • [12] The effectiveness of spiritual interventions in the workplace for work-related health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Diego-Cordero, Rocio
    Paz Lopez-Zurron, Ma
    Magdalena Vargas-Martinez, Ana
    Lucchetti, Giancarlo
    Vega-Escano, Juan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2021, 29 (06) : 1703 - 1712
  • [13] The effects of waterpipe tobacco smoking on health outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Waziry, Reem
    Jawad, Mohammed
    Ballout, Rami A.
    Al Akel, Mohammad
    Akl, Elie A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (01) : 32 - 43
  • [14] Association of Sexual Health Interventions With Sexual Health Outcomes in Black Adolescents A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Evans, Reina
    Widman, Laura
    Stokes, McKenzie N.
    Javidi, Hannah
    Hope, Elan C.
    Brasileiro, Julia
    [J]. JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2020, 174 (07) : 676 - 689
  • [15] Associations between dimensions of the social environment and cardiometabolic health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abreu, Taymara C.
    Beulens, Joline W. J.
    Heuvelman, Fleur
    Schoonmade, Linda J.
    Mackenbach, Joreintje D.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (08): : 1 - 14
  • [16] Health Outcomes of Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Beaudart, Charlotte
    Zaaria, Myriam
    Pasleau, Francoise
    Reginster, Jean-Yves
    Bruyere, Olivier
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01):
  • [17] Effect of Engagement With Digital Interventions on Mental Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gan, Daniel Z. Q.
    McGillivray, Lauren
    Han, Jin
    Christensen, Helen
    Torok, Michelle
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN DIGITAL HEALTH, 2021, 3
  • [18] IMPACT OF CLINICAL PHARMACY INTERVENTIONS ON HEALTH AND ECONOMIC OUTCOMES IN TYPE 2 DIABETES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Desse, T.
    Vakil, K.
    Namara, M. C. K.
    Manias, E.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S484 - S484
  • [19] The impact of digital health interventions on health-related outcomes in the workplace: A systematic review
    Howarth, Ana
    Quesada, Jose
    Silva, Jessica
    Judycki, Stephanie
    Mills, Peter R.
    [J]. DIGITAL HEALTH, 2018, 4
  • [20] Impact of clinical pharmacy interventions on health and economic outcomes in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Desse, Tigestu A.
    Vakil, Krishna
    Mc Namara, Kevin
    Manias, Elizabeth
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2021, 38 (06)