Revisiting the impact of Health at Every Size® interventions on health and cardiometabolic related outcomes: An updated systematic review with meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Clarke, Erin D. [1 ,2 ]
Stanford, Jordan [1 ,2 ]
Gomez-Martin, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Collins, Clare E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Coll Hlth Med & Wellbeing, Sch Hlth Sci, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[2] Hunter Med Res Inst, Food & Nutr Res Program, New Lambton Hts, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Adv Technol Ctr, Room 310,Univ Dr, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
HAES; health at every size; obesity; overweight; systematic review; EATING BEHAVIORS; WEIGHT-LOSS; HIGH BMI; WOMEN; OBESE; MINDFULNESS; ACCEPTANCE; MANAGEMENT; FITNESS; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/1747-0080.12869
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Aims: To (1) synthesise evidence from Health at Every Size (R) interventions on physical and psychological health in people with overweight and obesity and (2) report between-group differences within interventions evaluating the impact of Health at Every Size (R) interventions on health and health-related outcomes. Methods: Six databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Scopus) were searched from inception until November 2022. Included studies were conducted in adults with overweight or obesity, used Health at Every Size (R)-based interventions compared with control interventions and reported dietary, physical and/or psychological outcomes, including diet quality, anthropometry, or quality of life. Data on between-group differences were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB2. Random-effects meta-analyses were undertaken for outcomes with at least three studies reporting the same or comparable data. Results: From 128 studies identified, 19 full-text articles (10 unique studies, 6 published since 2017), were included. Meta-analysis found a significant reduction for susceptibility to hunger in Health at Every Size (R) intervention groups relative to controls (p = 0.005), with no significant difference (p > 0.05) between Health at Every Size (R) interventions and control groups for anthropometric, psychological or cardiometabolic outcomes (total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, systolic or diastolic blood pressure). Conclusion: Health at Every Size (R) interventions had similar results compared with weight-based interventions on anthropometric outcomes and cardiometabolic outcomes. Health at Every Size (R) interventions had a significant benefit for reducing susceptibility to hunger. The decision to use a Health at Every Size (R)-based intervention should be personalised to individual needs. Further research in more diverse populations is required using standardised outcome measures to facilitate future meta-analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 282
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Social environment and cardiometabolic health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abreu, T. C.
    Beulens, J. W. J.
    Schoonmade, L. J.
    Mackenbach, J. D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 32
  • [2] Prosocial Interventions and Health Outcomes A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Byrne, Margaret
    Tan, Rayner Kay Jin
    Wu, Dan
    Marley, Gifty
    Hlatshwako, Takhona Grace
    Tao, Yusha
    Bissram, Jennifer
    Nachman, Sophie
    Tang, Weiming
    Ramaswamy, Rohit
    Tucker, Joseph D.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (12) : E2346789
  • [3] Effects of health at every size® interventions on health-related outcomes of people with overweight and obesity: a systematic review
    Ulian, M. D.
    Aburad, L.
    da Silva Oliveira, M. S.
    Poppe, A. C. M.
    Sabatini, F.
    Perez, I.
    Gualano, B.
    Benatti, F. B.
    Pinto, A. J.
    Roble, O. J.
    Vessoni, A.
    de Morais Sato, P.
    Unsain, R. F.
    Baeza Scagliusi, F.
    [J]. OBESITY REVIEWS, 2018, 19 (12) : 1659 - 1666
  • [4] The effect of deprescribing interventions on mortality and health outcomes in older people: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Quek, Hui Wen
    Page, Amy
    Lee, Kenneth
    Lee, Georgie
    Hawthorne, Deborah
    Clifford, Rhonda
    Potter, Kathleen
    Etherton-Beer, Christopher
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 90 (10) : 2409 - 2482
  • [5] Buckwheat and Cardiometabolic Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Llanaj, Erand
    Ahanchi, Noushin Sadat
    Dizdari, Helga
    Taneri, Petek Eylul
    Niehot, Christa D.
    Wehrli, Faina
    Khatami, Farnaz
    Raeisi-Dehkordi, Hamidreza
    Kastrati, Lum
    Bano, Arjola
    Glisic, Marija
    Muka, Taulant
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (12):
  • [6] Developmental origins of cardiometabolic health outcomes in twins: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ashtree, Deborah N.
    McGuinness, Amelia J.
    Plummer, Michelle
    Sun, Cong
    Craig, Jeffrey M.
    Scurrah, Katrina J.
    [J]. NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2020, 30 (10) : 1609 - 1621
  • [7] Volunteer Impact on Health-Related Outcomes for Seniors: a Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis
    Moore, Ainsley
    Motagh, Shahrzad
    Sadeghirad, Behnam
    Begum, Housne
    Riva, John J.
    Gaber, Jessica
    Dolovich, Lisa
    [J]. CANADIAN GERIATRICS JOURNAL, 2021, 24 (01) : 44 - 72
  • [8] Impact of Pharmaceutical Care Interventions on Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mohammed, Mohammed A.
    Moles, Rebekah J.
    Chen, Timothy F.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2016, 50 (10) : 862 - 881
  • [9] ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT AND CARDIOMETABOLIC HEALTH OUTCOMES: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (AND META-ANALYSIS)
    Abreu, Taymara
    Beulens, Joline
    Schoonmade, Linda
    Mackenbach, Joreintje
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2022, 76 : A24 - A25
  • [10] Avocado Consumption and Cardiometabolic Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    James-Martin, Genevieve
    Brooker, Paige G.
    Hendrie, Gilly A.
    Stonehouse, Welma
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2024, 124 (02) : 233 - 248.e4