Exploring the effectiveness of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in trauma triage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Adebayo, Oluwasemilore [1 ,3 ]
Bhuiyan, Zunira Areeba [1 ]
Ahmed, Zubair [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Inst Inflammat & Ageing, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Ctr Trauma Sci Res, Birmingham, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Inst Inflammat & Ageing, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
来源
DIGITAL HEALTH | 2023年 / 9卷
关键词
Artificial intelligence; machine learning; deep learning; trauma; triage; INJURED PATIENTS; VARIABILITY; VALIDATION; QUALITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/20552076231205736
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe development of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) has advanced rapidly in the medical field, notably in trauma medicine. We aimed to systematically appraise the efficacy of AI, ML and DL models for predicting outcomes in trauma triage compared to conventional triage tools.MethodsWe searched PubMed, MEDLINE, ProQuest, Embase and reference lists for studies published from 1 January 2010 to 9 June 2022. We included studies which analysed the use of AI, ML and DL models for trauma triage in human subjects. Reviews and AI/ML/DL models used for other purposes such as teaching, or diagnosis were excluded. Data was extracted on AI/ML/DL model type, comparison tools, primary outcomes and secondary outcomes. We performed meta-analysis on studies reporting our main outcomes of mortality, hospitalisation and critical care admission.ResultsOne hundred and fourteen studies were identified in our search, of which 14 studies were included in the systematic review and 10 were included in the meta-analysis. All studies performed external validation. The best-performing AI/ML/DL models outperformed conventional trauma triage tools for all outcomes in all studies except two. For mortality, the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) score difference between AI/ML/DL models and conventional trauma triage was 0.09, 95% CI (0.02, 0.15), favouring AI/ML/DL models (p = 0.008). The mean AUROC score difference for hospitalisation was 0.11, 95% CI (0.10, 0.13), favouring AI/ML/DL models (p = 0.0001). For critical care admission, the mean AUROC score difference was 0.09, 95% CI (0.08, 0.10) favouring AI/ML/DL models (p = 0.00001).ConclusionsThis review demonstrates that the predictive ability of AI/ML/DL models is significantly better than conventional trauma triage tools for outcomes of mortality, hospitalisation and critical care admission. However, further research and in particular randomised controlled trials are required to evaluate the clinical and economic impacts of using AI/ML/DL models in trauma medicine.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Review of Further Directions for Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning in Smart Logistics
    Woschank, Manuel
    Rauch, Erwin
    Zsifkovits, Helmut
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [32] The unreasonable effectiveness of deep learning in artificial intelligence
    Sejnowski, Terrence J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (48) : 30033 - 30038
  • [33] Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Meta-analysis of Machine Learning Approaches
    Iannattone, Patrick A.
    Zhao, Xun
    VanHouten, Jacob
    Garg, Akhil
    Thao Huynh
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 36 (04) : 577 - 583
  • [34] Deep learning for cephalometric landmark detection: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Schwendicke, Falk
    Chaurasia, Akhilanand
    Arsiwala, Lubaina
    Lee, Jae-Hong
    Elhennawy, Karim
    Jost-Brinkmann, Paul-Georg
    Demarco, Flavio
    Krois, Joachim
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (07) : 4299 - 4309
  • [35] Deep learning for cephalometric landmark detection: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Falk Schwendicke
    Akhilanand Chaurasia
    Lubaina Arsiwala
    Jae-Hong Lee
    Karim Elhennawy
    Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann
    Flavio Demarco
    Joachim Krois
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2021, 25 : 4299 - 4309
  • [36] Deep learning for wireless capsule endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Soffer, Shelly
    Klang, Eyal
    Shimon, Orit
    Nachmias, Noy
    Eliakim, Rami
    Ben-Horin, Shomron
    Kopylov, Uri
    Barash, Yiftach
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 92 (04) : 831 - +
  • [37] Deep learning for temporomandibular joint arthropathies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rokhshad, Rata
    Mohammad-Rahimi, Hossein
    Sohrabniya, Fatemeh
    Jafari, Bahare
    Shobeiri, Parnian
    Tsolakis, Ioannis A.
    Ourang, Seyed AmirHossein
    Sultan, Ahmed S.
    Khawaja, Shehryar Nasir
    Bavarian, Roxanne
    Palomo, Juan Martin
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2024, 51 (08) : 1632 - 1644
  • [38] A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Vascular Surgery
    Javidan, Arshia P.
    Li, Allen
    Lee, Michael H.
    Forbes, Thomas L.
    Naji, Faysal
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 85 : 395 - 405
  • [39] Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Circular Economy: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review
    Noman A.A.
    Akter U.H.
    Pranto T.H.
    Haque A.K.M.B.
    Ann. Emer. Tech. Comp., 2022, 2 (13-40): : 13 - 40
  • [40] Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in orthopedic surgery
    Atik, O. Sahap
    JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2022, 33 (02): : 484 - 485