Exploring the effectiveness of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in trauma triage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Adebayo, Oluwasemilore [1 ,3 ]
Bhuiyan, Zunira Areeba [1 ]
Ahmed, Zubair [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Inst Inflammat & Ageing, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Ctr Trauma Sci Res, Birmingham, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Inst Inflammat & Ageing, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
来源
DIGITAL HEALTH | 2023年 / 9卷
关键词
Artificial intelligence; machine learning; deep learning; trauma; triage; INJURED PATIENTS; VARIABILITY; VALIDATION; QUALITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/20552076231205736
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe development of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) has advanced rapidly in the medical field, notably in trauma medicine. We aimed to systematically appraise the efficacy of AI, ML and DL models for predicting outcomes in trauma triage compared to conventional triage tools.MethodsWe searched PubMed, MEDLINE, ProQuest, Embase and reference lists for studies published from 1 January 2010 to 9 June 2022. We included studies which analysed the use of AI, ML and DL models for trauma triage in human subjects. Reviews and AI/ML/DL models used for other purposes such as teaching, or diagnosis were excluded. Data was extracted on AI/ML/DL model type, comparison tools, primary outcomes and secondary outcomes. We performed meta-analysis on studies reporting our main outcomes of mortality, hospitalisation and critical care admission.ResultsOne hundred and fourteen studies were identified in our search, of which 14 studies were included in the systematic review and 10 were included in the meta-analysis. All studies performed external validation. The best-performing AI/ML/DL models outperformed conventional trauma triage tools for all outcomes in all studies except two. For mortality, the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) score difference between AI/ML/DL models and conventional trauma triage was 0.09, 95% CI (0.02, 0.15), favouring AI/ML/DL models (p = 0.008). The mean AUROC score difference for hospitalisation was 0.11, 95% CI (0.10, 0.13), favouring AI/ML/DL models (p = 0.0001). For critical care admission, the mean AUROC score difference was 0.09, 95% CI (0.08, 0.10) favouring AI/ML/DL models (p = 0.00001).ConclusionsThis review demonstrates that the predictive ability of AI/ML/DL models is significantly better than conventional trauma triage tools for outcomes of mortality, hospitalisation and critical care admission. However, further research and in particular randomised controlled trials are required to evaluate the clinical and economic impacts of using AI/ML/DL models in trauma medicine.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Effectiveness of Supervised Machine Learning in Screening and Diagnosing Voice Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Al-Hussain, Ghada
    Shuweihdi, Farag
    Alali, Haitham
    Househ, Mowafa
    Abd-alrazaq, Alaa
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (10)
  • [22] Artificial Intelligence in Diabetic Retinopathy: Insights from a Meta-Analysis of Deep Learning
    Poly, Tahmina Nasrin
    Islam, Md Mohaimenul
    Yang, Hsuan Chia
    Nguyen, Phung-Anh
    Wu, Chieh Chen
    Li, Yu-Chuan
    MEDINFO 2019: HEALTH AND WELLBEING E-NETWORKS FOR ALL, 2019, 264 : 1556 - 1557
  • [23] Machine learning and artificial intelligence in cardiac transplantation: A systematic review
    Naruka, Vinci
    Arjomandi Rad, Arian
    Subbiah Ponniah, Hariharan
    Francis, Jeevan
    Vardanyan, Robert
    Tasoudis, Panagiotis
    Magouliotis, Dimitrios E.
    Lazopoulos, George L.
    Salmasi, Mohammad Yousuf
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2022, 46 (09) : 1741 - 1753
  • [24] The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
    Almeqdad, Qais I.
    Alodat, Ali M.
    Alquraan, Mahmoud F.
    Mohaidat, Mohammad A.
    Al-Makhzoomy, Alaa K.
    COGENT EDUCATION, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [25] Effectiveness of blended learning in pharmacy education: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Balakrishnan, Athira
    Puthean, Sandra
    Satheesh, Gautam
    Unnikrishnan, M. K.
    Rashid, Muhammed
    Nair, Sreedharan
    Thunga, Girish
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (06):
  • [26] The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Qian
    Peng, Weijun
    Zhang, Fan
    Hu, Rong
    Li, Yingxue
    Yan, Weirong
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (01)
  • [27] Groundwater Level Modeling with Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ahmadi, Arman
    Olyaei, Mohammadali
    Heydari, Zahra
    Emami, Mohammad
    Zeynolabedin, Amin
    Ghomlaghi, Arash
    Daccache, Andre
    Fogg, Graham E.
    Sadegh, Mojtaba
    WATER, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [28] Machine learning for prediction of viral hepatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Moulaei, Khadijeh
    Sharifi, Hamid
    Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz
    Haghdoost, Ali Akbar
    Nasiri, Naser
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 179
  • [29] Machine learning algorithms for predicting PTSD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Masoumeh Vali
    Hossein Motahari Nezhad
    Levente Kovacs
    Amir H Gandomi
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 25 (1)
  • [30] Machine learning in predicting antimicrobial resistance: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tang, Rui
    Luo, Rui
    Tang, Shiwei
    Song, Haoxin
    Chen, Xiujuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2022, 60 (5-6)