Exploring the effectiveness of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in trauma triage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Adebayo, Oluwasemilore [1 ,3 ]
Bhuiyan, Zunira Areeba [1 ]
Ahmed, Zubair [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Inst Inflammat & Ageing, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Ctr Trauma Sci Res, Birmingham, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Inst Inflammat & Ageing, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
来源
DIGITAL HEALTH | 2023年 / 9卷
关键词
Artificial intelligence; machine learning; deep learning; trauma; triage; INJURED PATIENTS; VARIABILITY; VALIDATION; QUALITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/20552076231205736
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe development of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) has advanced rapidly in the medical field, notably in trauma medicine. We aimed to systematically appraise the efficacy of AI, ML and DL models for predicting outcomes in trauma triage compared to conventional triage tools.MethodsWe searched PubMed, MEDLINE, ProQuest, Embase and reference lists for studies published from 1 January 2010 to 9 June 2022. We included studies which analysed the use of AI, ML and DL models for trauma triage in human subjects. Reviews and AI/ML/DL models used for other purposes such as teaching, or diagnosis were excluded. Data was extracted on AI/ML/DL model type, comparison tools, primary outcomes and secondary outcomes. We performed meta-analysis on studies reporting our main outcomes of mortality, hospitalisation and critical care admission.ResultsOne hundred and fourteen studies were identified in our search, of which 14 studies were included in the systematic review and 10 were included in the meta-analysis. All studies performed external validation. The best-performing AI/ML/DL models outperformed conventional trauma triage tools for all outcomes in all studies except two. For mortality, the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) score difference between AI/ML/DL models and conventional trauma triage was 0.09, 95% CI (0.02, 0.15), favouring AI/ML/DL models (p = 0.008). The mean AUROC score difference for hospitalisation was 0.11, 95% CI (0.10, 0.13), favouring AI/ML/DL models (p = 0.0001). For critical care admission, the mean AUROC score difference was 0.09, 95% CI (0.08, 0.10) favouring AI/ML/DL models (p = 0.00001).ConclusionsThis review demonstrates that the predictive ability of AI/ML/DL models is significantly better than conventional trauma triage tools for outcomes of mortality, hospitalisation and critical care admission. However, further research and in particular randomised controlled trials are required to evaluate the clinical and economic impacts of using AI/ML/DL models in trauma medicine.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in rhinology: a systematic review
    Antonio Mario Bulfamante
    Francesco Ferella
    Austin Michael Miller
    Cecilia Rosso
    Carlotta Pipolo
    Emanuela Fuccillo
    Giovanni Felisati
    Alberto Maria Saibene
    [J]. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2023, 280 : 529 - 542
  • [2] Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in rhinology: a systematic review
    Bulfamante, Antonio Mario
    Ferella, Francesco
    Miller, Austin Michael
    Rosso, Cecilia
    Pipolo, Carlotta
    Fuccillo, Emanuela
    Felisati, Giovanni
    Saibene, Alberto Maria
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 280 (02) : 529 - 542
  • [3] Artificial intelligence/machine learning for neuroimaging to predict hemorrhagic transformation: Systematic review/meta-analysis
    Dagher, Richard
    Ozkara, Burak Berksu
    Karabacak, Mert
    Dagher, Samir A.
    Rumbaut, Elijah Isaac
    Luna, Licia P.
    Yedavalli, Vivek S.
    Wintermark, Max
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2024,
  • [4] Role of Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning in Skin Disease Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Nancy V.A.O.
    Prabhavathy P.
    Arya M.S.
    [J]. Annals of Data Science, 2024, 11 (06) : 2109 - 2139
  • [5] Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning in Nutrition: A Systematic Review
    Armand, Tagne Poupi Theodore
    Nfor, Kintoh Allen
    Kim, Jung-In
    Kim, Hee-Cheol
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [6] The effectiveness of artificial intelligence on learning achievement and learning perception: A meta-analysis
    Zheng, Lanqin
    Niu, Jiayu
    Zhong, Lu
    Gyasi, Juliana Fosua
    [J]. INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2023, 31 (09) : 5650 - 5664
  • [7] Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Automated Cephalometric Landmark Identification: A Meta-Analysis Previewed by a Systematic Review
    Rauniyar, Sabita
    Jena, Sanghamitra
    Sahoo, Nivedita
    Mohanty, Pritam
    Dash, Bhagabati P.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [8] A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial neural network, machine learning, deep learning, and ensemble learning approaches in field of geotechnical engineering
    Yaghoubi, Elaheh
    Yaghoubi, Elnaz
    Khamees, Ahmed
    Vakili, Amir Hossein
    [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2024, 36 (21) : 12655 - 12699
  • [9] Prediction Models for Intrauterine Growth Restriction Using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Rescinito, Riccardo
    Ratti, Matteo
    Payedimarri, Anil Babu
    Panella, Massimiliano
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (11)
  • [10] Artificial intelligence and machine learning applications in urinary tract infections identification and prediction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shen, Li
    An, Jialu
    Wang, Nanding
    Wu, Jin
    Yao, Jia
    Gao, Yumei
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)