Validating the 12-item proxy-administered World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in young children with chronic physical illness in Canada

被引:6
|
作者
Ferro, Mark A. [1 ]
Dol, Megan [1 ]
Basque, Dominique [1 ]
Elgie, Melissa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Sch Publ Hlth Sci, Waterloo, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Adolescent; chronic disease; disability; functioning; measurement; scales; validity; DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS; FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT; SUICIDAL-BEHAVIOR; MENTAL-DISORDERS; EMERGING ADULTS; SELF-CONCEPT; ADOLESCENTS; YOUTH; ANXIETY; TRAJECTORIES;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2022.2118868
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose This study investigated the psychometric properties of the 12-item proxy-administered World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in young children with chronic physical illness in Canada. Materials and methods Data come from the Multimorbidity in Youth across the Life-course, a longitudinal study of Canadian youth with physical illnesses (n = 263). Baseline parent-reported data from children (2-9 years, n = 143) and adolescents (10-16 years, n = 117) were analyzed. Wilcoxon's tests examined differences in WHODAS 2.0 scores between subgroups. Internal consistency was estimated, and confirmatory factor analysis modeled the WHODAS 2.0 factor structure. Regression modeling examined if the WHODAS 2.0 could discriminate between children with vs. without mental comorbidity. Results Differences were found between children and adolescents regarding self-care and getting along, and for the item on emotional affect. Inter-item correlations were similar between subgroups and internal consistency was strong for children (alpha = 0.90) and adolescents (alpha = 0.93). The factor structure of the WHODAS 2.0 was confirmed; parameter estimates were similar between subgroups. The association between mental comorbidity and disability did not differ by age - comorbidity was associated with greater disability (beta = 5.87, p < 0.01). Conclusions The 12-item proxy-administered WHODAS 2.0 appears valid and reliable in young children with physical illness and can be used in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:3135 / 3142
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DSM-5 and the Assessment of Functioning: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)
    Gold, Liza H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2014, 42 (02): : 173 - 181
  • [32] Why sample selection matters in exploratory factor analysis: implications for the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Gaskin, Cadeyrn J.
    Lambert, Sylvie D.
    Bowe, Steven J.
    Orellana, Liliana
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [33] Comparing the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in children and adolescents
    de la Pena, Francisco R.
    Escalona, Mariana Paulina
    Ulloa, Rosa Elena
    Palacios-Cruz, Lino
    Palacio, Juan David
    Mayer, Pablo
    Diaz, Ricardo
    Rosetti, Marcos Francisco
    SALUD MENTAL, 2024, 47 (03) : 137 - 143
  • [34] Why sample selection matters in exploratory factor analysis: implications for the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Cadeyrn J. Gaskin
    Sylvie D. Lambert
    Steven J. Bowe
    Liliana Orellana
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17
  • [35] Correspondence: Functioning assessment by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0-WHODAS Reply
    Paton, Michelle
    Lane, Rebecca
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2021, 67 (01) : 72 - 73
  • [36] Psychometric Properties and Validation of the Polish Version of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in Patients with Huntington's Disease
    Cwirlej-Sozanska, Agnieszka
    Sozanski, Bernard
    Kupczyk, Mateusz
    Leszczak, Justyna
    Kwolek, Andrzej
    Wilmowska-Pietruszynska, Anna
    Wisniowska-Szurlej, Agnieszka
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (05) : 1 - 14
  • [37] Diagnostic accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) to estimate disability after stroke
    dos Santos, Heyriane Martins
    Pereira, Gabriela Santos
    de Oliveira, Leia Cordeiro
    da Silva, Paula Karina
    Lima, Michael Goncalves
    Alexandre de Amorim Feliz, Victor Hugo
    Coelho de Morais Faria, Christina Danielli
    Silva, Soraia Micaela
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 45 (13) : 2169 - 2174
  • [38] The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a chronic pain population being considered for chronic opioid therapy
    Wawrzyniak, Kelly M.
    Finkelman, Matthew
    Schatman, Michael E.
    Kulich, Ronald J.
    Weed, Valerie F.
    Myrta, Eura
    DiBenedetto, David J.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2019, 12 : 1855 - 1862
  • [39] The Brazilian version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) is reliable and valid for chronic stroke survivors
    Ovando, Angelica Cristiane
    Dall'Agnol, Catiane
    Luiz, Jhoanne Merlyn
    Momo, Renata Andrade
    De Castro, Shamyr Sulyvan
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2024, 31 (02) : 211 - 220
  • [40] Validation of the 36-item and 12-item self-report World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) in individuals with autism spectrum disorder
    Park, Shin Ho
    Demetriou, Eleni A.
    Pepper, Karen L.
    Song, Yun Ju C.
    Thomas, Emma E.
    Hickie, Ian B.
    Glozier, Nick
    Guastella, Adam J.
    AUTISM RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (07) : 1101 - 1111