Validating the 12-item proxy-administered World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in young children with chronic physical illness in Canada

被引:6
|
作者
Ferro, Mark A. [1 ]
Dol, Megan [1 ]
Basque, Dominique [1 ]
Elgie, Melissa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Sch Publ Hlth Sci, Waterloo, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Adolescent; chronic disease; disability; functioning; measurement; scales; validity; DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS; FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT; SUICIDAL-BEHAVIOR; MENTAL-DISORDERS; EMERGING ADULTS; SELF-CONCEPT; ADOLESCENTS; YOUTH; ANXIETY; TRAJECTORIES;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2022.2118868
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose This study investigated the psychometric properties of the 12-item proxy-administered World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in young children with chronic physical illness in Canada. Materials and methods Data come from the Multimorbidity in Youth across the Life-course, a longitudinal study of Canadian youth with physical illnesses (n = 263). Baseline parent-reported data from children (2-9 years, n = 143) and adolescents (10-16 years, n = 117) were analyzed. Wilcoxon's tests examined differences in WHODAS 2.0 scores between subgroups. Internal consistency was estimated, and confirmatory factor analysis modeled the WHODAS 2.0 factor structure. Regression modeling examined if the WHODAS 2.0 could discriminate between children with vs. without mental comorbidity. Results Differences were found between children and adolescents regarding self-care and getting along, and for the item on emotional affect. Inter-item correlations were similar between subgroups and internal consistency was strong for children (alpha = 0.90) and adolescents (alpha = 0.93). The factor structure of the WHODAS 2.0 was confirmed; parameter estimates were similar between subgroups. The association between mental comorbidity and disability did not differ by age - comorbidity was associated with greater disability (beta = 5.87, p < 0.01). Conclusions The 12-item proxy-administered WHODAS 2.0 appears valid and reliable in young children with physical illness and can be used in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:3135 / 3142
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A study of the psychometric properties of 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in a large population of people with chronic musculoskeletal pain
    Saltychev, Mikhail
    Barlund, Esa
    Mattie, Ryan
    McCormick, Zachary
    Paltamaa, Jaana
    Laimi, Katri
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 31 (02) : 262 - 272
  • [22] Proxy reliability of the 12-item world health organization disability assessment schedule II among adult patients with mental disorders
    Wei Zhou
    Qian Liu
    Yu Yu
    Shuiyuan Xiao
    Lizhang Chen
    Kaveh Khoshnood
    Shimin Zheng
    Quality of Life Research, 2020, 29 : 2219 - 2229
  • [23] The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2 (WHODAS 2.0): remarks on the need to revise the WHODAS
    Castro, Shamyr
    Leite, Camila Ferreira
    Coenen, Michaela
    Buchalla, Cassia Maria
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2019, 35 (07):
  • [24] Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in patients attending the pain clinic
    Aki Fujiwara
    Mitsuru Ida
    Katsuhiro Kimoto
    Keisuke Watanabe
    Masahiko Kawaguchi
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2021, 35 : 81 - 85
  • [25] Validation of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in individuals with schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, and diabetes in Singapore
    Abdin, Edimansyah
    Seet, Vanessa
    Jeyagurunathan, Anitha
    Tan, Sing Chik
    Mok, Yee Ming
    Verma, Swapna
    Lee, Eng Sing
    Subramaniam, Mythily
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (11):
  • [26] Comparison of the 12-item and 36-item versions of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 using longitudinal data from community mental health outreach service users
    Iwanaga, Mai
    Yamaguchi, Sosei
    Sato, Sayaka
    Usui, Kaori
    Nakanishi, Kiyoaki
    Nishiuchi, Erisa
    Shimodaira, Michiyo
    So, Yugan
    Fujii, Chiyo
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 44 (02) : 457 - 463
  • [27] Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with asthma
    de Souza, Clarice Cristina Cunha
    Zacarias, Laila Candida
    Campos, Nataly Gurgel
    Fortaleza, Simone Castelo Branco
    Madeira, Caroline Alves
    Almondes, Jardel Goncalves de Sousa
    Leite, Camila Ferreira
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024,
  • [28] Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in patients attending the pain clinic
    Fujiwara, Aki
    Ida, Mitsuru
    Kimoto, Katsuhiro
    Watanabe, Keisuke
    Kawaguchi, Masahiko
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2021, 35 (01) : 81 - 85
  • [29] Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with COPD
    Zacarias, Laila Candida
    da Costa Camara, Kaytianne Jennifer
    Alves, Barbara Marques
    Aguiar Pessoa Morano, Maria Tereza
    Sampaio Viana, Cyntia Maria
    Bucharles Mont'Alverne, Daniela Gardano
    Castro, Shamyr Sulyvan
    Leite, Camila Ferreira
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (19) : 5663 - 5668
  • [30] Validity of the 36-item Persian (Farsi) version of the world health organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS) 2.0
    Rajeziesfahani, Sepideh
    Federici, Stefano
    Bacci, Silvia
    Meloni, Fabio
    Bartolucci, Francesco
    Zahiroddin, Alireza
    Shams, Jamal
    Noorbakhsh, Simasadat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 48 (01) : 14 - 39