The Effect of Finishing and Polishing with Proprietary Vs Interchanged Polishing Kits on the Surface Roughness of Different Ceramic Materials

被引:3
|
作者
Irusa, Karina F. [1 ]
Albouy, Jean-Pierre [2 ]
Cook, Ryan [2 ]
Amaya-Pajares, Silvia [3 ]
Donovan, Terence [2 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Comprehens Care, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Div Comprehens Oral Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Restorat Dent, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
Ceramics; polishing; surface roughness; zirconia; DENTAL CERAMICS; RESTORATIVE MATERIALS; HUMAN ENAMEL; WEAR; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13533
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the surface roughness of glazed and polished monolithic ceramic materials and to use this as a baseline for comparison after adjustment and polishing with both the recommended kit for the specific materials as well as interchanged polishing kits. Material and methods Flat ceramic specimens (n = 150) were fabricated from IPS ZirCAD Prime, IPS E.max, and Vitabloc Mark II. The specimens were adjusted and polished using either the proprietary polishing kit for the material or interchanged kits. The surface roughness was objectively assessed using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and profilometer. Subjective assessment of surface finish was performed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Gravimetric weight loss of each sample was measured before and after polishing using a digital microscale. The mean surface roughness and standard deviation was calculated for each ceramic- polisher pair. A factorial ANOVA was used to compare the mean surface roughness values in nanometers between multiple groups (alpha = 0.05). The subjective results from the SEM were reported as descriptive statistics Results The zirconia polishing system produced surfaces with the lowest surface roughness regardless of the ceramic material. The polisher-ceramic combination was found to have a statistically significant effect on both Ra and RMS values when the AFM was used (p = 0.039 and 0.010, respectively). Conclusion The zirconia polishing system resulted in the lowest surface roughness values regardless of ceramic materials tested. The zirconia polishing system also did not result in significant gravimetric weight loss regardless of the ceramic material used.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 272
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of Different Finishing/Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Two Heat-Treated Composite Resins
    Lima, Gabrielle Ribeiro
    Baima Maluf, Nathalia Cardoso
    Carvalho Souza, Soraia de Fatima
    Macedo Paiva, Antonio Ernandes
    Souza, Erick Miranda
    Santana, Ivone Lima
    MATERIALS RESEARCH-IBERO-AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERIALS, 2011, 14 (02): : 142 - 145
  • [32] EFFECT OF DIFFERENT POLISHING SYSTEMS ON THE SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF MICROHYBRID COMPOSITES
    Brusaca Almeida Scheibe, Kristine Guara
    Brusaca Almeida, Karoline Guara
    Medeiros, Igor Studart
    Costa, Jose Ferreira
    Coelho Alves, Claudia Maria
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2009, 17 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [33] Comparison of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Bacterial Adhesion of Resin Composite
    Pietrokovski, Yoav
    Zeituni, Dan
    Schwartz, Adi
    Beyth, Nurit
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (21)
  • [34] Surface roughness of resin composites after finishing and polishing procedures
    Marsola, FP
    Nagem, H
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A338 - A338
  • [35] Surface Roughness after Finishing and Polishing of a Restorative NanoComposite Material
    Andrian, Sorin
    Munteanu, Bogdan
    Taraboanata, Ionut
    Negraia, Dan
    Nica, Petru-Edward
    Stoleriu, Simona
    Nica, Irina
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-HEALTH AND BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE (EHB), 2017, : 101 - 104
  • [36] Surface roughness of condensable resin after finishing and polishing.
    Reis, AF
    Giannini, M
    Lovadino, JR
    Dias, CTS
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 277 - 277
  • [37] Effect of one-step polishing systems on surface roughness of different flowable restorative materials
    Ozel, Emre
    Korkmaz, Yonca
    Attar, Nuray
    Karabulut, Erdem
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2008, 27 (06) : 755 - 764
  • [38] The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces
    Babina, Ksenia
    Polyakova, Maria
    Sokhova, Inna
    Doroshina, Vladlena
    Arakelyan, Marianna
    Novozhilova, Nina
    NANOMATERIALS, 2020, 10 (07) : 1 - 14
  • [39] The Effect of Prophylactic Polishing Pastes on Surface Roughness of Indirect Restorative Materials
    Say, Esra Can
    Yurdaguven, Haktan
    Malkondu, Ozlem
    Unlu, Nimet
    Soyman, Mubin
    Kazazoglu, Ender
    SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2014,
  • [40] Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials
    Neme, AL
    Frazier, KB
    Roeder, LB
    Debner, TL
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2002, 27 (01) : 50 - 58