The Effect of Finishing and Polishing with Proprietary Vs Interchanged Polishing Kits on the Surface Roughness of Different Ceramic Materials

被引:3
|
作者
Irusa, Karina F. [1 ]
Albouy, Jean-Pierre [2 ]
Cook, Ryan [2 ]
Amaya-Pajares, Silvia [3 ]
Donovan, Terence [2 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Comprehens Care, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Div Comprehens Oral Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Restorat Dent, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
Ceramics; polishing; surface roughness; zirconia; DENTAL CERAMICS; RESTORATIVE MATERIALS; HUMAN ENAMEL; WEAR; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13533
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the surface roughness of glazed and polished monolithic ceramic materials and to use this as a baseline for comparison after adjustment and polishing with both the recommended kit for the specific materials as well as interchanged polishing kits. Material and methods Flat ceramic specimens (n = 150) were fabricated from IPS ZirCAD Prime, IPS E.max, and Vitabloc Mark II. The specimens were adjusted and polished using either the proprietary polishing kit for the material or interchanged kits. The surface roughness was objectively assessed using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and profilometer. Subjective assessment of surface finish was performed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Gravimetric weight loss of each sample was measured before and after polishing using a digital microscale. The mean surface roughness and standard deviation was calculated for each ceramic- polisher pair. A factorial ANOVA was used to compare the mean surface roughness values in nanometers between multiple groups (alpha = 0.05). The subjective results from the SEM were reported as descriptive statistics Results The zirconia polishing system produced surfaces with the lowest surface roughness regardless of the ceramic material. The polisher-ceramic combination was found to have a statistically significant effect on both Ra and RMS values when the AFM was used (p = 0.039 and 0.010, respectively). Conclusion The zirconia polishing system resulted in the lowest surface roughness values regardless of ceramic materials tested. The zirconia polishing system also did not result in significant gravimetric weight loss regardless of the ceramic material used.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 272
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Finishing/Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Novel Posterior Composites
    Marghalani, Hanadi Y.
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2010, 22 (02) : 127 - 138
  • [22] EVALUATION OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF DENTAL COMPOSITES SUBJECT TO DIFFERENT METHODS OF FINISHING AND POLISHING
    Rios, Mariana
    Araujo, Filipe
    Marques, Tiago
    Oliveira, Filipe
    Vaz, Mario
    Correia, Andre
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICS AND MATERIALS IN DESIGN (M2D2017), 2017, : 1785 - 1786
  • [23] Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites
    Antonson, Sibel A.
    Yazici, A. Ruya
    Kilinc, Evren
    Antonson, Donald E.
    Hardigan, Patrick C.
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2011, 39 : E9 - E17
  • [24] Polishing of Denture Base Acrylic Resin with Chairside Polishing Kits: An SEM and Surface Roughness Study
    Chatzivasileiou, Konstantinos
    Emmanouil, Ioannis
    Kotsiomiti, Eleni
    Pissiotis, Argirios
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2013, 26 (01) : 79 - 81
  • [25] Surface Roughness and Hardness of CAD/CAM Ceramic Materials after Polishing with a Multipurpose Polishing Kit: An In Vitro Study
    Limpuangthip, Nareudee
    Poosanthanasarn, Ekaluck
    Salimee, Prarom
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2023, 17 (04) : 1075 - 1083
  • [26] Gloss and surface roughness produced by polishing kits on resin composites
    Sadidzadeh, Ramtin
    Cakir, Deniz
    Ramp, Lance C.
    Burgess, John O.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2010, 23 (04): : 208 - 212
  • [27] The use of polishing systems on the surface of different ceramic materials.
    Stoll, R
    Seitner, T
    Schulte, A
    Stachniss, V
    CAD/CIM IN AESTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1996, : 589 - 597
  • [28] INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT POLISHING TECHNIQUES ON THE SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF DENTURE BASE AND REPAIR MATERIALS
    Gungor, Hasan
    Gundogdu, Mustafa
    Duymus, Zeynep Yesil
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 112 (05): : 1271 - 1277
  • [29] Surface conditioning methods and polishing techniques effect on surface roughness of a feldspar ceramic
    Sarac, Y. Sinasi
    Elekdag-Turk, Selma
    Sarac, Duygu
    Turk, Tamer
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2007, 77 (04) : 723 - 728
  • [30] Effect of four different finishing and polishing systems on resin composites: roughness surface and gloss retention evaluations
    Tosco, Vincenzo
    Monterubbianesi, Riccardo
    Orilisi, Giulia
    Procaccini, Maurizio
    Grandini, Simone
    Putignano, Angelo
    Orsini, Giovanna
    MINERVA STOMATOLOGICA, 2020, 69 (04): : 207 - 214