E-Satis : A new method for analysis of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

被引:2
|
作者
Crubezy, M. [1 ,2 ]
Haesebaert, J. [1 ,3 ]
Geig, A. [2 ]
Michel, P. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Res Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, Inserm U1290, U1290, F-69008 Lyon, France
[2] Inst tudes KPAM, F-75002 Paris, France
[3] Hosp Civils Lyon, Pole Sante Publ & Serv Rech Epid Emiol Clin, F-69002 Lyon, France
[4] Hosp Civils Lyon, Direct Qual usagers & St populat, F-69002 Lyon, France
来源
关键词
EXPERIENCE SURVEYS; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.respe.2023.101839
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective. - Almost 80% of the patients responding to the nationwide French patient experience and satisfac-tion survey (e-Satis) provided free text comments. The objective of this article is to describe an innovative methodology for analysis of this qualitative data.Methodology. - This methodological approach is based on analysis of qualitative data from the comments (verbatims) of respondents to the e-Satis survey. Analysis of the verbatims consists in three main steps: (i) analysis of the meaning of the words, with constitution of a thematic dictionary through exploratory research without preconceived notions; (ii) analysis of the syntax, i.e., the way in which the ideas are articulated, which will enable calculation of a linguistic indicator of speakers' involvement in their speech; (iii) production of statistics and characterisation of the themes, which will include three indicators: occurrence of the themes, the average satisfaction shown in the respondents' discourse, and the positive and negative involvement with which they express themselves. Given these results, a priority matrix of four categories of action is established: strong points, priority areas, good practices, and weak signals. Results. - This methodological approach was applied to 5868 e-Satis questionnaires out of a total of 10,061 verbatims by respondents hospitalised at the Hospices Civils de Lyon between 2018 and 2019. The analysis identified 28 major themes with 184 sub-themes. An extract is presented in this article for illustration purposes. Discussion. - A methodological approach based on analysis of qualitative data will enable transformation of unstructured data (verbatims) into measurable and comparable data. This methodology is structured to overcome the limitations of closed questions; open questions allow respondents to describe their experiences and perceptions in their own words. Moreover, it is a first step toward comparability of results over time with those of other establishments. This approach is unique in France on account of (a) its exploratory thematic research without preconceived notions and (b) its syntactic analysis of verbatims. Conclusions. - This verbatim analysis methodology should enable precise and operational characterization of Patient Experience and induce prioritized improvement actions in healthcare institutions.& COPY; 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Outcome measurement in trauma surgery with a fracture database and clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
    Bilici, M.
    Morgenstern, M.
    Frank, C.
    Alispahic, N.
    Mueller, A.
    Sauermann, M.
    Eckardt, H.
    Rikli, D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [42] Outcome Measurement in Trauma Surgery with a Fracture Database and Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)
    Bilici, Murat
    Morgenstern, Mario
    Frank, Christian
    Alispahic, Nikola
    Mueller, Annabell
    Sauermann, Mandy
    Eckardt, Henrik
    Rikli, Daniel
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2021, 151 : 42S - 42S
  • [43] Feasibility and Acceptability of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (e-PROMs) Collection and Feedback in Hemodialysis Patients
    Viecelli, Andrea K.
    Duncanson, Emily
    Bennett, Paul N.
    D'Antoine, Matilda N.
    Dansie, Kathryn
    Tong, Allison
    Palmer, Suetonia
    Jesudason, Shilpa
    McDonald, Stephen P.
    Morton, Rachael L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 32 (10): : 287 - 288
  • [44] METHODOLOGICAL LIMITATIONS OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES (PROMS) IN ONCOLOGY: A META-REVIEW
    Smith, A. B.
    Taylor, M.
    Parry, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (07) : A460 - A460
  • [45] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Acute Stroke: Rationale, Methods and Future Directions
    Reeves, Mathew
    Lisabeth, Lynda
    Williams, Linda
    Katzan, Irene
    Kapral, Moira
    Deutsch, Anne
    Prvu-Bettger, Janet
    STROKE, 2018, 49 (06) : 1549 - 1556
  • [46] Patient-reported outcome measures
    Ribeiro, Bernard
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2007, 100 (09) : 397 - 397
  • [47] Cost-effectiveness Applications of Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Spine Surgery
    Lee, Thomas J.
    Thomas, Alexander A.
    Grandhi, Nikhil R.
    Galetta, Matthew S.
    Goyal, Dhruv K. C.
    Fang Taolin
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (04): : 140 - 145
  • [48] How do doctors refer to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) in oncology consultations?
    Greenhalgh, Joanne
    Abhyankar, Purva
    McCluskey, Serena
    Takeuchi, Elena
    Velikova, Galina
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2013, 22 (05) : 939 - 950
  • [49] Current Status of Worldwide Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Spine Care
    Falavigna, Asdrubal
    Dozza, Diego Cassol
    Teles, Alisson R.
    Wong, Chung Chek
    Barbagallo, Giuseppe
    Brodke, Darrel
    Al-Mutair, Abdulaziz
    Ghogawala, Zoher
    Riew, K. Daniel
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 108 : 328 - 335
  • [50] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care: recommendations and challenges IN REPLY
    Agarwal, Anupriya
    Morton, Rachael L.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2022, 217 (02) : 111 - 111