E-Satis : A new method for analysis of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

被引:2
|
作者
Crubezy, M. [1 ,2 ]
Haesebaert, J. [1 ,3 ]
Geig, A. [2 ]
Michel, P. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Res Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, Inserm U1290, U1290, F-69008 Lyon, France
[2] Inst tudes KPAM, F-75002 Paris, France
[3] Hosp Civils Lyon, Pole Sante Publ & Serv Rech Epid Emiol Clin, F-69002 Lyon, France
[4] Hosp Civils Lyon, Direct Qual usagers & St populat, F-69002 Lyon, France
来源
关键词
EXPERIENCE SURVEYS; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.respe.2023.101839
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective. - Almost 80% of the patients responding to the nationwide French patient experience and satisfac-tion survey (e-Satis) provided free text comments. The objective of this article is to describe an innovative methodology for analysis of this qualitative data.Methodology. - This methodological approach is based on analysis of qualitative data from the comments (verbatims) of respondents to the e-Satis survey. Analysis of the verbatims consists in three main steps: (i) analysis of the meaning of the words, with constitution of a thematic dictionary through exploratory research without preconceived notions; (ii) analysis of the syntax, i.e., the way in which the ideas are articulated, which will enable calculation of a linguistic indicator of speakers' involvement in their speech; (iii) production of statistics and characterisation of the themes, which will include three indicators: occurrence of the themes, the average satisfaction shown in the respondents' discourse, and the positive and negative involvement with which they express themselves. Given these results, a priority matrix of four categories of action is established: strong points, priority areas, good practices, and weak signals. Results. - This methodological approach was applied to 5868 e-Satis questionnaires out of a total of 10,061 verbatims by respondents hospitalised at the Hospices Civils de Lyon between 2018 and 2019. The analysis identified 28 major themes with 184 sub-themes. An extract is presented in this article for illustration purposes. Discussion. - A methodological approach based on analysis of qualitative data will enable transformation of unstructured data (verbatims) into measurable and comparable data. This methodology is structured to overcome the limitations of closed questions; open questions allow respondents to describe their experiences and perceptions in their own words. Moreover, it is a first step toward comparability of results over time with those of other establishments. This approach is unique in France on account of (a) its exploratory thematic research without preconceived notions and (b) its syntactic analysis of verbatims. Conclusions. - This verbatim analysis methodology should enable precise and operational characterization of Patient Experience and induce prioritized improvement actions in healthcare institutions.& COPY; 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by orthopedic surgeons in Saudi Arabia
    Fayez Alshehri
    Abdulaziz Alarabi
    Mohammed Alharthi
    Thamer Alanazi
    Ahmed Alohali
    Mohammad Alsaleem
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15
  • [32] Gender perspective in the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in rare diseases
    Perez, Sara
    Funes, Silvina
    Leyra, Begona
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (SUPPL 1) : 5 - 5
  • [33] Groin hernia repair, surgeon volume, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
    Coomer, Will
    Hamdani, Ashrah
    Patel, Gaural
    SURGERY, 2016, 159 (03) : 979 - 980
  • [34] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care: recommendations and challenges
    Trujols, Joan
    Duran-Sindreu, Santiago
    Portella, Maria J.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2022, 217 (02) : 110 - 110
  • [35] Glycaemic control and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in type 1 diabetes
    Eeg-Olofsson, K.
    Engstrom, M. Svedbo
    Borg, S.
    Palaszewski, B.
    Leksell, J.
    Johansson, U-B
    Gudbjornsdottir, S.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2016, 59 : S35 - S36
  • [36] Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in hyperhidrosis: a systematic review
    Gabes, Michaela
    Knuettel, Helge
    Kann, Gesina
    Tischer, Christina
    Kissingen, Bad
    Apfelbacher, Christian
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S104 - S104
  • [37] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care: recommendations and challenges
    Agarwal, Anupriya
    Pain, Tilley
    Levesque, Jean-Frederic
    Girgis, Afaf
    Hoffman, Anna
    Karnon, Jonathan
    King, Madeleine T.
    Shah, Karan K.
    Morton, Rachael L.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2022, 216 (01) : 9 - 11
  • [38] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review
    Melly, Conor
    McGeehan, Gearoid
    O'Connor, Niall
    Johnston, Alison
    Bass, Gary
    Mohseni, Shahin
    Donohoe, Claire
    Bucholc, Magda
    Sugrue, Michael
    BJS OPEN, 2022, 6 (03):
  • [39] PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES (PROMS) IN SARCOIDOSIS
    Thunold, Rikke Flor
    Lokke, Anders
    Cohen, Adam Langballe
    Ole, Hilberg
    Bendstrup, Elisabeth
    SARCOIDOSIS VASCULITIS AND DIFFUSE LUNG DISEASES, 2017, 34 (01) : 2 - 17
  • [40] A review of the barriers to using Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in routine cancer care
    Hanh Nguyen
    Butow, Phyllis
    Dhillon, Haryana
    Sundaresan, Puma
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2021, 68 (02) : 186 - 195