Robotic colorectal surgery in the emergent diverticulitis setting: is it safe? A review of large national database

被引:10
|
作者
Curfman, Karleigh R. R. [1 ]
Jones, Ian F. F. [2 ]
Conner, Jeffrey R. R. [2 ]
Neighorn, Christopher C. C. [3 ]
Wilson, Ryan K. K. [3 ]
Rashidi, Laila [1 ]
机构
[1] MultiCare Hlth Network, Tacoma, WA 98405 USA
[2] Madigan Army Med Ctr, Tacoma, WA 98431 USA
[3] Intuit Surg, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA
关键词
Robotic surgery; Diverticulitis; Colectomy; Emergency surgery;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04436-3
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundAs robotic colorectal surgery continues to advance in conjunction with improved recovery protocols, we began implementing robotic surgery (RS) as an option for emergent diverticulitis surgery. Our hospital system utilizes the Da Vinci Xi system, and staff are required to undergo training, making emergent colorectal surgery a feasible option. However, it is essential to determine the safety with reproducibility of our experiences.MethodsA de-identified retrospective review was performed of Intuitive's national database which obtained data from 262 facilities from January 2018 through December 2021. This identified over 22,000 emergent colorectal surgeries. Of those, over 2500 were performed for diverticulitis in which 126 were RS, 446 laparoscopic surgery (LS), and 1952 open surgery (OS). Clinical outcome metrics including conversion rates, anastomotic leaks, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, length of stay, mortality, and readmissions were obtained. The cohort was defined by patients who were seen in the emergency department (ED) with diverticulitis and proceeded to have a sigmoid colectomy within 24 h of ED arrival.ResultsRS was associated with increased operating time (RS 262, LS 207, OS 182 min), but data has shown many benefits of emergent RS compared to OS. We identified significant decreases in ICU admission rates (OS 19.0%, RS 9.5%, p = 0.01) and anastomotic leak rates (OS 4.4%, RS 0.8%, p = 0.04), with borderline improvement in overall length of stay (OS 9.9, RS 8.9 days, p = 0.05). When compared with LS, RS showed many comparable results. However, RS witnessed a statistically significant improvement in anastomotic leak rates (LS 4.5%, RS 0.8%, p = 0.04). Importantly, there was a striking difference in conversion rates to OS. LS converted over 28.7% of cases to OS, whereas RS only converted 7.9%, p = 0.000005.ConclusionGiven these findings, RS is another MIS tool that could be a safe and feasible option for the acute management of emergent diverticulitis.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Primary Colorectal Lymphoma: Institutional Experience and Review of a National Database
    Hangge, Patrick T.
    Calderon, Esteban
    Habermann, Elizabeth B.
    Glasgow, Amy E.
    Mishra, Nitin
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2019, 62 (10) : 1167 - 1176
  • [32] Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty is Safe in the Ambulatory Surgery Center Setting
    Eason, Travis
    Mihalko, William
    Toy, Patrick C.
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023, 54 (02) : 153 - 159
  • [33] Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: safe and effective? - A systematic review
    Lourenco, Tania
    Murray, Alison
    Grant, Adrian
    McKinley, Aileen
    Krukowski, Zygmunt
    Vale, Luke
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (05): : 1146 - 1160
  • [34] Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: safe and effective? – A systematic review
    Tania Lourenco
    Alison Murray
    Adrian Grant
    Aileen McKinley
    Zygmunt Krukowski
    Luke Vale
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2008, 22 : 1146 - 1160
  • [35] Robotic ventral hernia repair is not superior to laparoscopic: a national database review
    Armijo, Priscila
    Pratap, Akshay
    Wang, Yi
    Shostrom, Valerie
    Oleynikov, Dmitry
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (04): : 1834 - 1839
  • [36] Robotic surgery for colorectal liver metastases resection: A systematic review
    Rocca, Aldo
    Scacchi, Andrea
    Cappuccio, Micaela
    Avella, Pasquale
    Bugiantella, Walter
    De Rosa, Michele
    Costa, Gianluca
    Polistena, Andrea
    Codacci-Pisanelli, Massimo
    Amato, Bruno
    Carbone, Fabio
    Ceccarelli, Graziano
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2021, 17 (06):
  • [37] Robotic ventral hernia repair is not superior to laparoscopic: a national database review
    Priscila Armijo
    Akshay Pratap
    Yi Wang
    Valerie Shostrom
    Dmitry Oleynikov
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 1834 - 1839
  • [38] Robotic Surgery for Renal Mass In Horseshoe Kidney Is Safe And Feasible: A Review
    Ng, A.
    Yuminaga, Y.
    Mumtaz, F.
    Gulamhusein, A.
    Tran, M.
    Barod, R.
    Patki, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 164 - 164
  • [39] Safe Adoption of Robotic Colorectal Surgery Using Structured Training: Early Irish Experience
    Aradaib, M.
    Neary, P.
    Hafeez, A.
    Kalbassi, R.
    O'Riordain, D.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 187 : S169 - S169
  • [40] Safe adoption of robotic colorectal surgery using structured training: early Irish experience
    Aradaib, Mohammed
    Neary, Paul
    Hafeez, Adnan
    Kalbassi, Reza
    Parvaiz, Amjad
    O'Riordain, Diarmuid
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2019, 13 (05) : 657 - 662