Robotic colorectal surgery in the emergent diverticulitis setting: is it safe? A review of large national database

被引:10
|
作者
Curfman, Karleigh R. R. [1 ]
Jones, Ian F. F. [2 ]
Conner, Jeffrey R. R. [2 ]
Neighorn, Christopher C. C. [3 ]
Wilson, Ryan K. K. [3 ]
Rashidi, Laila [1 ]
机构
[1] MultiCare Hlth Network, Tacoma, WA 98405 USA
[2] Madigan Army Med Ctr, Tacoma, WA 98431 USA
[3] Intuit Surg, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA
关键词
Robotic surgery; Diverticulitis; Colectomy; Emergency surgery;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04436-3
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundAs robotic colorectal surgery continues to advance in conjunction with improved recovery protocols, we began implementing robotic surgery (RS) as an option for emergent diverticulitis surgery. Our hospital system utilizes the Da Vinci Xi system, and staff are required to undergo training, making emergent colorectal surgery a feasible option. However, it is essential to determine the safety with reproducibility of our experiences.MethodsA de-identified retrospective review was performed of Intuitive's national database which obtained data from 262 facilities from January 2018 through December 2021. This identified over 22,000 emergent colorectal surgeries. Of those, over 2500 were performed for diverticulitis in which 126 were RS, 446 laparoscopic surgery (LS), and 1952 open surgery (OS). Clinical outcome metrics including conversion rates, anastomotic leaks, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, length of stay, mortality, and readmissions were obtained. The cohort was defined by patients who were seen in the emergency department (ED) with diverticulitis and proceeded to have a sigmoid colectomy within 24 h of ED arrival.ResultsRS was associated with increased operating time (RS 262, LS 207, OS 182 min), but data has shown many benefits of emergent RS compared to OS. We identified significant decreases in ICU admission rates (OS 19.0%, RS 9.5%, p = 0.01) and anastomotic leak rates (OS 4.4%, RS 0.8%, p = 0.04), with borderline improvement in overall length of stay (OS 9.9, RS 8.9 days, p = 0.05). When compared with LS, RS showed many comparable results. However, RS witnessed a statistically significant improvement in anastomotic leak rates (LS 4.5%, RS 0.8%, p = 0.04). Importantly, there was a striking difference in conversion rates to OS. LS converted over 28.7% of cases to OS, whereas RS only converted 7.9%, p = 0.000005.ConclusionGiven these findings, RS is another MIS tool that could be a safe and feasible option for the acute management of emergent diverticulitis.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review of the Literature
    Papanikolaou, Ioannis G.
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2014, 24 (06): : 478 - 483
  • [22] A review of the national chemotherapy errors database and recommendations for safe administration
    Mehta, P
    Beltz, S
    Cousins, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY, 1998, 5 (06): : 463 - 473
  • [23] Innovations in surgery for gallbladder cancer: A review of robotic surgery as a feasible and safe option
    Mellado, Sebastian
    Chirban, Ariana M.
    Shapera, Emanuel
    Rivera, Belen
    Panettieri, Elena
    Vivanco, Marcelo
    Conrad, Claudius
    Sucandy, Iswanto
    Vega, Eduardo A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 233 : 37 - 44
  • [24] Robotic surgery for malignant and large adrenal masses: A doable and safe option
    Ayhan, Erdemir
    Rasa, Kemal Huseyin
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2023, 19 (02) : 212 - 216
  • [25] Systematic review of emergent laparoscopic colorectal surgery for benign and malignant disease
    Chand, Manish
    Siddiqui, Muhammed R. S.
    Gupta, Ashish
    Rasheed, Shahnawaz
    Tekkis, Paris
    Parvaiz, Amjad
    Mirnezami, Alex H.
    Qureshi, Tahseen
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (45) : 16956 - 16963
  • [26] National survey into anaesthetic practice for laparoscopic robotic assisted colorectal surgery
    Couzens, C.
    Qureshi, T.
    Bromilow, J.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 : 20 - 20
  • [27] Systematic review of emergent laparoscopic colorectal surgery for benign and malignant disease
    Manish Chand
    Muhammed RS Siddiqui
    Ashish Gupta
    Shahnawaz Rasheed
    Paris Tekkis
    Amjad Parvaiz
    Alex H Mirnezami
    Tahseen Qureshi
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, (45) : 16956 - 16963
  • [28] Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume
    Yeo, Heather L.
    Isaacs, Abby J.
    Abelson, Jonathan S.
    Milsom, Jeffrey W.
    Sedrakyan, Art
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (06) : 535 - 542
  • [29] Introduction of Robotic Surgery into a Community Hospital Setting: A Prospective Comparison of Robotic and Open Colorectal Resection for Cancer
    Zawadzki, Marek
    Krzystek-Korpacka, Malgorzata
    Rzaca, Marek
    Czarnecki, Roman
    Obuszko, Zbigniew
    Witkiewicz, Wojciech
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 34 (06) : 489 - 494
  • [30] Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic colectomy using a large national database: outcomes and trends related to surgery center volume
    Yeo, Heather L.
    Isaacs, Abby
    Milsom, Jeffrey
    Sedrakyan, Art
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2014, 219 (04) : E7 - E7