Deep learning model for automatic image quality assessment in PET

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Haiqiong [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yu [1 ]
Wang, Yanmei [3 ]
Ma, Yanru [1 ]
Niu, Na [1 ]
Jing, Hongli [1 ]
Huo, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing Key Lab Mol Targeted Diag & Therapy Nucl M, State Key Lab Complex Severe & Rare Dis,Dept Nucl, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Med Sci Res Ctr, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] GE Healthcare China, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
关键词
PET; Image quality; Deep learning; Classification; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; MACULAR DEGENERATION; CLASSIFICATION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-023-01017-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundA variety of external factors might seriously degrade PET image quality and lead to inconsistent results. The aim of this study is to explore a potential PET image quality assessment (QA) method with deep learning (DL).MethodsA total of 89 PET images were acquired from Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) in China in this study. Ground-truth quality for images was assessed by two senior radiologists and classified into five grades (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3, grade 4, and grade 5). Grade 5 is the best image quality. After preprocessing, the Dense Convolutional Network (DenseNet) was trained to automatically recognize optimal- and poor-quality PET images. Accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and area under the ROC Curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic properties of all models. All indicators of models were assessed using fivefold cross-validation. An image quality QA tool was developed based on our deep learning model. A PET QA report can be automatically obtained after inputting PET images.ResultsFour tasks were generated. Task2 showed worst performance in AUC,ACC, specificity and sensitivity among 4 tasks, and task1 showed unstable performance between training and testing and task3 showed low specificity in both training and testing. Task 4 showed the best diagnostic properties and discriminative performance between poor image quality (grade 1, grade 2) and good quality (grade 3, grade 4, grade 5) images. The automated quality assessment of task 4 showed ACC = 0.77, specificity = 0.71, and sensitivity = 0.83, in the train set; ACC = 0.85, specificity = 0.79, and sensitivity = 0.91, in the test set, respectively. The ROC measuring performance of task 4 had an AUC of 0.86 in the train set and 0.91 in the test set. The image QA tool could output basic information of images, scan and reconstruction parameters, typical instances of PET images, and deep learning score.ConclusionsThis study highlights the feasibility of the assessment of image quality in PET images using a deep learning model, which may assist with accelerating clinical research by reliably assessing image quality.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm for CCTA: Image Quality Assessment and Clinical Application
    Catapano, Federica
    Lisi, Costanza
    Savini, Giovanni
    Olivieri, Marzia
    Figliozzi, Stefano
    Caracciolo, Alessandra
    Monti, Lorenzo
    Francone, Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2024, 48 (02) : 217 - 221
  • [42] Deep Learning for Image Quality Assessment of Fundus Images in Retinopathy of Prematurity
    Coyner, Aaron S.
    Swan, Ryan
    Brown, James M.
    Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree
    Kim, Sang Jin
    Campbell, J. Peter
    Jonas, Karyn
    Chan, R. V. Paul
    Ostmo, Susan
    Chiang, Michael F.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [43] Blind CT Image Quality Assessment via Deep Learning Framework
    Gao, Qi
    Li, Sui
    Zhu, Manman
    Li, Danyang
    Bian, Zhaoying
    Lyu, Qingwen
    Zeng, Dong
    Ma, Jianhua
    [J]. 2019 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2019,
  • [44] No-reference image quality assessment based on deep learning method
    Yang, Ruozhang
    Su, Jiangang
    Yu, Wenguang
    [J]. 2017 IEEE 3RD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (ITOEC), 2017, : 476 - 479
  • [45] An Exploratory Study on Judicial Image Quality Assessment Based on Deep Learning
    Gu, Qiqi
    Cai, Weilin
    Yu, Shengcheng
    Chen, Zhenyu
    [J]. 2019 IEEE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE QUALITY, RELIABILITY AND SECURITY (QRS 2019), 2019, : 300 - 305
  • [46] About the generalizability of deep learning based image quality assessment in mammography
    Faller, Josua
    Amanova, Narbota
    van Engen, Ruben
    Martin, Joerg
    Elster, Clemens
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 4 (04):
  • [47] Automatic Quality Assessment of Pork Belly via Deep Learning and Ultrasound Imaging
    Wang, Tianshuo
    Yang, Huan
    Zhang, Chunlei
    Chao, Xiaohuan
    Liu, Mingzheng
    Chen, Jiahao
    Liu, Shuhan
    Zhou, Bo
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (15):
  • [48] Deep Learning for the Detection of Landmarks in Head CT Images and Automatic Quality Assessment
    Deshpande, Hrishikesh
    Saalbach, Axel
    Harder, Tim
    Young, Stewart
    Buelow, Thomas
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2021: IMAGE PROCESSING, 2021, 11596
  • [49] PET image reconstruction with deep progressive learning
    Lv, Yang
    Xi, Chen
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (10):
  • [50] Deep Learning for Automatic IC Image Analysis
    Hong, Xuenong
    Cheng, Deruo
    Shi, Yiqiong
    Lin, Tong
    Gwee, Bah Hwee
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING (DSP), 2018,