Deep learning model for automatic image quality assessment in PET

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Haiqiong [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yu [1 ]
Wang, Yanmei [3 ]
Ma, Yanru [1 ]
Niu, Na [1 ]
Jing, Hongli [1 ]
Huo, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing Key Lab Mol Targeted Diag & Therapy Nucl M, State Key Lab Complex Severe & Rare Dis,Dept Nucl, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Med Sci Res Ctr, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] GE Healthcare China, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
关键词
PET; Image quality; Deep learning; Classification; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; MACULAR DEGENERATION; CLASSIFICATION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-023-01017-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundA variety of external factors might seriously degrade PET image quality and lead to inconsistent results. The aim of this study is to explore a potential PET image quality assessment (QA) method with deep learning (DL).MethodsA total of 89 PET images were acquired from Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) in China in this study. Ground-truth quality for images was assessed by two senior radiologists and classified into five grades (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3, grade 4, and grade 5). Grade 5 is the best image quality. After preprocessing, the Dense Convolutional Network (DenseNet) was trained to automatically recognize optimal- and poor-quality PET images. Accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and area under the ROC Curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic properties of all models. All indicators of models were assessed using fivefold cross-validation. An image quality QA tool was developed based on our deep learning model. A PET QA report can be automatically obtained after inputting PET images.ResultsFour tasks were generated. Task2 showed worst performance in AUC,ACC, specificity and sensitivity among 4 tasks, and task1 showed unstable performance between training and testing and task3 showed low specificity in both training and testing. Task 4 showed the best diagnostic properties and discriminative performance between poor image quality (grade 1, grade 2) and good quality (grade 3, grade 4, grade 5) images. The automated quality assessment of task 4 showed ACC = 0.77, specificity = 0.71, and sensitivity = 0.83, in the train set; ACC = 0.85, specificity = 0.79, and sensitivity = 0.91, in the test set, respectively. The ROC measuring performance of task 4 had an AUC of 0.86 in the train set and 0.91 in the test set. The image QA tool could output basic information of images, scan and reconstruction parameters, typical instances of PET images, and deep learning score.ConclusionsThis study highlights the feasibility of the assessment of image quality in PET images using a deep learning model, which may assist with accelerating clinical research by reliably assessing image quality.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Automatic Image Annotation Using Adaptive Convolutional Deep Learning Model
    Jayaraj, R.
    Lokesh, S.
    [J]. INTELLIGENT AUTOMATION AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 36 (01): : 481 - 497
  • [32] Higher SNR PET image prediction using a deep learning model and MRI image
    Liu, Chih-Chieh
    Qi, Jinyi
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (11):
  • [33] ACTIVE LEARNING FOR IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT BY MODEL OBSERVER
    Lorente, Iris
    Brankov, Jovan G.
    [J]. 2014 IEEE 11TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI), 2014, : 1352 - 1355
  • [34] A Hybrid Image Quality Measure for Automatic Image Quality Assessment
    Bin Mansoor, Atif
    Haider, Maaz
    Mian, Ajmal S.
    Khan, Shoab A.
    [J]. IMAGE ANALYSIS, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5575 : 91 - 98
  • [35] A DEEP LEARNING BASED NO-REFERENCE IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT MODEL FOR SINGLE-IMAGE SUPER-RESOLUTION
    Bare, Bahetiyaer
    Li, Ke
    Yan, Bo
    Feng, Bailan
    Yao, Chunfeng
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2018, : 1223 - 1227
  • [36] A deep learning-based automatic image quality assessment method for respiratory phase on computed tomography chest images
    Su, Jialin
    Li, Meifang
    Lin, Yongping
    Xiong, Liu
    Yuan, Caixing
    Zhou, Zhimin
    Yan, Kunlong
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2024, 14 (03) : 2240 - 2254
  • [37] Automatic Human Perception-Driven PET Image Quality and Diagnostic Confidence Assessment Using Radiomics and Machine Learning Algorithms
    Amini, Mehdi
    Hajianfar, Ghasem
    Salimi, Yazdan
    Kenarsari, Maziar Sabouri
    Hervier, Elsa
    Mainta, Ismini
    Shiri, Isaac
    Zaidi, Habib
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 64
  • [38] Deep supervised dictionary learning for no-reference image quality assessment
    Huang, Yuge
    Liu, Xuesong
    Tian, Xiang
    Zhou, Fan
    Chen, Yaowu
    Jiang, Rongxin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC IMAGING, 2018, 27 (02)
  • [39] No-reference Distorted Image Quality Assessment Based on Deep Learning
    Guo, Chang
    Liu, Haoting
    Pan, Shunliang
    Dong, Weidong
    Yang, Shuo
    Tian, Guoliang
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 IEEE 4TH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (ITOEC 2018), 2018, : 586 - 591
  • [40] Deep Learning of Human Visual Sensitivity in Image Quality Assessment Framework
    Kim, Jongyoo
    Lee, Sanghoon
    [J]. 30TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR 2017), 2017, : 1969 - 1977