Deep learning model for automatic image quality assessment in PET

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Haiqiong [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yu [1 ]
Wang, Yanmei [3 ]
Ma, Yanru [1 ]
Niu, Na [1 ]
Jing, Hongli [1 ]
Huo, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing Key Lab Mol Targeted Diag & Therapy Nucl M, State Key Lab Complex Severe & Rare Dis,Dept Nucl, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Med Sci Res Ctr, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] GE Healthcare China, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
关键词
PET; Image quality; Deep learning; Classification; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; MACULAR DEGENERATION; CLASSIFICATION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-023-01017-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundA variety of external factors might seriously degrade PET image quality and lead to inconsistent results. The aim of this study is to explore a potential PET image quality assessment (QA) method with deep learning (DL).MethodsA total of 89 PET images were acquired from Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) in China in this study. Ground-truth quality for images was assessed by two senior radiologists and classified into five grades (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3, grade 4, and grade 5). Grade 5 is the best image quality. After preprocessing, the Dense Convolutional Network (DenseNet) was trained to automatically recognize optimal- and poor-quality PET images. Accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and area under the ROC Curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic properties of all models. All indicators of models were assessed using fivefold cross-validation. An image quality QA tool was developed based on our deep learning model. A PET QA report can be automatically obtained after inputting PET images.ResultsFour tasks were generated. Task2 showed worst performance in AUC,ACC, specificity and sensitivity among 4 tasks, and task1 showed unstable performance between training and testing and task3 showed low specificity in both training and testing. Task 4 showed the best diagnostic properties and discriminative performance between poor image quality (grade 1, grade 2) and good quality (grade 3, grade 4, grade 5) images. The automated quality assessment of task 4 showed ACC = 0.77, specificity = 0.71, and sensitivity = 0.83, in the train set; ACC = 0.85, specificity = 0.79, and sensitivity = 0.91, in the test set, respectively. The ROC measuring performance of task 4 had an AUC of 0.86 in the train set and 0.91 in the test set. The image QA tool could output basic information of images, scan and reconstruction parameters, typical instances of PET images, and deep learning score.ConclusionsThis study highlights the feasibility of the assessment of image quality in PET images using a deep learning model, which may assist with accelerating clinical research by reliably assessing image quality.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deep learning model for automatic image quality assessment in PET
    Haiqiong Zhang
    Yu Liu
    Yanmei Wang
    Yanru Ma
    Na Niu
    Hongli Jing
    Li Huo
    [J]. BMC Medical Imaging, 23
  • [2] Automatic tongue image quality assessment using a multi-task deep learning model
    Xian, Huimin
    Xie, Yanyan
    Yang, Zizhu
    Zhang, Linzi
    Li, Shangxuan
    Shang, Hongcai
    Zhou, Wu
    Zhang, Honglai
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [3] A Deep Learning Methodology for Automatic Assessment of Portrait Image Aesthetic Quality
    Wettayakorn, Poom
    Traivijitkhun, Siripong
    Phetchai, Ponpat
    Tuarob, Suppawong
    [J]. 2018 15TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (JCSSE), 2018, : 129 - 134
  • [4] Deep Generalized Learning Model for PET Image Reconstruction
    Zhang, Qiyang
    Hu, Yingying
    Zhao, Yumo
    Cheng, Jing
    Fan, Wei
    Hu, Debin
    Shi, Fuxiao
    Cao, Shuangliang
    Zhou, Yun
    Yang, Yongfeng
    Liu, Xin
    Zheng, Hairong
    Liang, Dong
    Hu, Zhanli
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 43 (01) : 122 - 134
  • [5] LEARNING DEEP VECTOR REGRESSION MODEL FOR NO-REFERENCE IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT
    Gu, Jie
    Meng, Gaofeng
    Wang, Lingfeng
    Pan, Chunhong
    [J]. 2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2017, : 2961 - 2965
  • [6] A Lightweight Deep Learning Model for Mobile Eye Fundus Image Quality Assessment
    Perez, Andres D.
    Perdomo, Oscar
    Gonzalez, Fabio A.
    [J]. 15TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MEDICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS, 2020, 11330
  • [7] Deep Learning for Improving Image Quality with Noisy PET Data
    Schaefferkoetter, Josh
    Metser, Ur
    Veit-Haibach, Patrick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 60
  • [8] Clinical Evaluation of Deep Learning for Improving PET Image Quality
    Schaefferkoetter, Josh
    Sertic, Andrew
    Lechtman, Eli
    Veit-Haibach, Patrick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 61
  • [9] Image-based PSMA PET/MRI deep learning model for automatic prostate cancer grading
    Solari, E.
    Schachoff, S.
    Rauscher, I.
    Eiber, M.
    Weber, W.
    Navab, N.
    Nekolla, S. G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2023, 50 (SUPPL 1) : S320 - S321
  • [10] Blind Image Quality Assessment via Deep Learning
    Hou, Weilong
    Gao, Xinbo
    Tao, Dacheng
    Li, Xuelong
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS, 2015, 26 (06) : 1275 - 1286