An Analysis of Renewable Energy Sources for Developing a Sustainable and Low-Carbon Hydrogen Economy in China

被引:12
|
作者
Liu, Runkun [1 ]
Solangi, Yasir Ahmed [2 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Coll Finance & Stat, Changsha 410006, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Management, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
关键词
renewable energy sources; hydrogen economy; low-carbon energy; fuzzy AHP; fuzzy TOPSIS; China; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; DECISION-MAKING; TECHNOLOGIES; SELECTION;
D O I
10.3390/pr11041225
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
A significant effort is required to reduce China's dependency on fossil fuels while also supporting worldwide efforts to reduce climate change and develop hydrogen energy systems. A hydrogen economy must include renewable energy sources (RESs), which can offer a clean and sustainable energy source for producing hydrogen. This study uses an integrated fuzzy AHP-fuzzy TOPSIS method to evaluate and rank renewable energy sources for developing a hydrogen economy in China. This is a novel approach because it can capture the uncertainty and vagueness in the decision-making process and provide a comprehensive and robust evaluation of the alternatives. Moreover, it considers multiple criteria and sub-criteria that reflect the environmental, economic, technical, social, and political aspects of RESs from the perspective of a hydrogen economy. This study identified five major criteria, fifteen sub-criteria, and six RES alternatives for hydrogen production. This integrated approach uses fuzzy AHP to evaluate and rank the criteria and sub-criteria and fuzzy TOPSIS to identify the most suitable and feasible RES. The results show that environmental, economic, and technical criteria are the most important criteria. Solar, wind, and hydropower are the top three RES alternatives that are most suitable and feasible. Furthermore, biomass, geothermal, and tidal energy were ranked lower, which might be due to the limitations and challenges in their adoption and performance in the context of the criteria and sub-criteria used for the analysis. This study's findings add to the literature on guidelines to strategize for renewable energy adoption for the hydrogen economy in China.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Road to China's Neotype Industrialization: Developing Low-carbon Economy
    You, Daming
    Chen, Guofan
    ADVANCES IN ASIA-PACIFIC LOW CARBON ECONOMY, 2010, : 26 - 29
  • [22] China's Necessity and Policy Options of Developing Low-Carbon Economy
    Zhou Rui
    Fan Weiguo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LOW-CARBON ECONOMY AND TECHNOLOGY SCIENCE, 2010, : 366 - 372
  • [23] Energy and Environmental Policy in China: Towards a Low-Carbon Economy
    Auffhammer, Maximilian
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (03): : 183 - 184
  • [24] China's Energy Economy from Low-Carbon Perspective
    Qu, Xiaonan
    LTLGB 2012: PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOW-CARBON TRANSPORTATION AND LOGISTICS, AND GREEN BUILDINGS. VOL 1, 2013, : 435 - 441
  • [25] Guest editorial: Embracing the low-carbon economy of sustainable energy development
    Jiping, Zhou
    JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2010, 62 (04): : 18 - 20
  • [26] Development of low-carbon economy as the base of sustainable improvement of energy security
    Ivan A. Kapitonov
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2021, 23 : 3077 - 3096
  • [27] Development of low-carbon economy as the base of sustainable improvement of energy security
    Kapitonov, Ivan A.
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 23 (03) : 3077 - 3096
  • [28] Low-Carbon Economy as the Main Factor of Sustainable Development of Energy Security
    Kapitonov, Ivan A.
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2020, 19 (01): : 3 - 13
  • [29] Rentiers of the low-carbon economy? Renewable energy's extractive fiscal geographies
    Knuth, Sarah
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2023, 55 (06): : 1548 - 1564
  • [30] Stock market development and low-carbon economy: The role of innovation and renewable energy
    Zeqiraj, Veton
    Sohag, Kazi
    Soytas, Ugur
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 91