Government's green grip: Does industrial policy improve firm environmental performance?

被引:5
|
作者
Bu, Wenchao [1 ,2 ]
Ren, Siyu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nankai Univ, Sch Econ, Tianjin 300071, Peoples R China
[2] Inst Int Econ Nankai Univ, Tianjin 300071, Peoples R China
[3] Nankai Univ, Ctr Transnatl Studies, Tianjin 300071, Peoples R China
关键词
PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; AIR-POLLUTION; CHINA; TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; QUALITY; IMPACT; TRADE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/mde.3861
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
National industrial policy is a common means for the government to regulate economic activities, and its effect on the environmental performance of enterprises is controversial. Based on the encouraged industries in China's "Five-Year Plan," the impact and micro-influence mechanism of industrial policies on SO2 emission of enterprises are systematically analyzed. The results indicate that industrial policy can significantly reduce the SO2 emission in encouraged industries, and the conclusion is still valid after a series of robustness tests. This emission reduction effect is greater for the state-owned firm, high R&D intensity firm, and high-pollution firm. Compared with the firms in general encouraged industry, industrial policy has a greater impact on the SO2 emissions of firms in the key encouraged industries. The industrial policy promotes the resources transfer from high-polluting companies to low-polluting companies, reducing the market share of high-pollution firms. Additionally, it reduces pollution emissions through front-end pollution control (clean energy substitution and technological innovation). The conclusions of this study provide theoretical support for appropriate government policy intervention and have important practical significance for China's green sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页码:3026 / 3042
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does environmental information disclosure contribute to improve firm financial performance? An examination of the underlying mechanism
    Wang, Shanyong
    Wang, Hualong
    Wang, Jing
    Yang, Feng
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 714
  • [32] Buying green: Government procurement as an instrument of environmental policy
    Marron, DB
    [J]. PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW, 1997, 25 (03): : 285 - 305
  • [33] Impact of environmental policy on firm's market performance: The case of ISO 14001
    Riaz, Hammad
    Saeed, Abubakr
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (02) : 681 - 693
  • [34] Improvement of firm's environmental performance under the background of green credit: The role of green supplier integration
    He, Wei
    Li, Sui cheng
    Si, Rongrong
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 59
  • [35] Does agricultural fiscal policy improve green development in China's agriculture sector? Evidence from energy and environmental perspectives
    Wu, Xiaoli
    Xie, Mengyuan
    Xu, Shaojun
    Fei, Rilong
    Pan, An
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [36] Fiscal Decentralization, Government Environmental Preference and Industrial Green Transformation
    Wang, Erhong
    Cao, Qun
    Ding, Yongqiang
    Sun, Huaping
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [37] Environmental Management Systems and Firm Performance: Improving Firm Environmental Policy through Stakeholder Engagement
    Martin-de Castro, Gregorio
    Amores-Salvado, Javier
    Navas-Lopez, Jose E.
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 23 (04) : 243 - 256
  • [38] The Influence of Green External Integration on Firm Performance: Does Firm Size Matter?
    Song, Yongtao
    Feng, Taiwen
    Jiang, Wenbo
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (08)
  • [39] Firm Capabilities Theory and Industrial Policy's Effect
    Zhang Zeyi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GROWTH OF FIRM AND MANAGEMENT INNOVATION, 2009, : 40 - 43
  • [40] Does Green Innovation Improve SME Performance?
    Rustiarini, Ni Wayan
    Bhegawati, Desak Ayu Sriary
    Mendra, Ni Putu Yuria
    [J]. ECONOMIES, 2022, 10 (12)