Government's green grip: Does industrial policy improve firm environmental performance?

被引:5
|
作者
Bu, Wenchao [1 ,2 ]
Ren, Siyu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nankai Univ, Sch Econ, Tianjin 300071, Peoples R China
[2] Inst Int Econ Nankai Univ, Tianjin 300071, Peoples R China
[3] Nankai Univ, Ctr Transnatl Studies, Tianjin 300071, Peoples R China
关键词
PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; AIR-POLLUTION; CHINA; TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; QUALITY; IMPACT; TRADE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/mde.3861
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
National industrial policy is a common means for the government to regulate economic activities, and its effect on the environmental performance of enterprises is controversial. Based on the encouraged industries in China's "Five-Year Plan," the impact and micro-influence mechanism of industrial policies on SO2 emission of enterprises are systematically analyzed. The results indicate that industrial policy can significantly reduce the SO2 emission in encouraged industries, and the conclusion is still valid after a series of robustness tests. This emission reduction effect is greater for the state-owned firm, high R&D intensity firm, and high-pollution firm. Compared with the firms in general encouraged industry, industrial policy has a greater impact on the SO2 emissions of firms in the key encouraged industries. The industrial policy promotes the resources transfer from high-polluting companies to low-polluting companies, reducing the market share of high-pollution firms. Additionally, it reduces pollution emissions through front-end pollution control (clean energy substitution and technological innovation). The conclusions of this study provide theoretical support for appropriate government policy intervention and have important practical significance for China's green sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页码:3026 / 3042
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of environmental performance and policy on firm environmental reputation
    De Miguel De Blas, Marta
    [J]. MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2021, 59 (02) : 190 - 204
  • [22] Effects of green marketing strategy on firm financial performance. The moderating role of government policy
    Eneizan, Bilal M.
    Mater, Ai
    Al-Zawahreh, Abdelghafour
    Alkhawaldeh, Abdelbaset M.
    Eneizan, Odai
    [J]. BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC HORIZONS, 2019, 15 (02) : 304 - 324
  • [23] The Effect of Government Incentive Policy on Firm's Innovation Performance: A Multilevel Analysis
    Xu Er-ming
    Xu Kai
    [J]. 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (ICMSE), 2010, : 1416 - 1421
  • [24] Does environmental performance improve market valuation of the firm: evidence from Indian market
    Kumar S.
    Shetty S.
    [J]. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2018, 20 (2) : 241 - 260
  • [25] Developing a government's balance sheet-does it improve performance?
    Warren, Ken
    [J]. PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (01) : 9 - 14
  • [26] The effect of the government's green grip: Evidence from government-initiated corporate environmental ratings and corporate debt financing
    Liu, Xiaojuan
    Chen, Xiaoyijing
    Deng, Baijun
    [J]. PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2023, 80
  • [27] Environmental Disclosure And Firm Performance: Does Environmental Performance Really Matter?
    Arafat, M. Yasser
    Warokka, Ari
    Dewi, Siska Ratna
    [J]. CREATING GLOBAL COMPETITIVE ECONOMIES: A 360-DEGREE APPROACH, VOLS 1-4, 2011, : 243 - +
  • [28] Can open government data policy improve firm performance? Evidence from listed firms in China
    Zhou, Mingle
    Wang, Yu
    Huang, Xiaohui
    Li, Gang
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2023, 44 (05) : 2593 - 2603
  • [29] Can green industrial policy improve total factor productivity? Firm-level evidence from China
    Zhang, Yijun
    Li, Xiaoping
    Song, Yi
    Jiang, Feitao
    [J]. STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2021, 59 : 51 - 62
  • [30] Green marketing strategy and the firm's performance: the moderating role of environmental culture
    Fraj, Elena
    Martinez, Eva
    Matute, Jorge
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC MARKETING, 2011, 19 (04) : 339 - 355