Automated Opt-Out vs Opt-In Patient Outreach Strategies for Breast Cancer Screening A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:7
|
作者
Marcotte, Leah M. [1 ,5 ]
Deeds, Stefanie [1 ,2 ]
Wheat, Chelle [3 ]
Gunnink, Eric [3 ]
Gray, Kristen [3 ,4 ]
Rojas, Jorge [3 ]
Finch, Carolyn [2 ]
Nelson, Karin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Reddy, Ashok [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Seattle, WA USA
[2] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle, WA USA
[3] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Ctr Vet Ctr & Value Driven Care, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Syst & Populat Hlth, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.4321
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Optimal strategies for population-based outreach for breast cancer screening remain unknown. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect on breast cancer screening of an opt-out automatic mammography referral strategy compared with an opt-in automated telephone message strategy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This pragmatic randomized clinical trialwas conducted from April 2022 to January 2023 at a single Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. Participants were female veterans aged 45 to 75 years who were eligible for breast cancer screening and enrolled in VA primary care. INTERVENTION Veterans were randomized 1:1 to receive either an automatic mammography referral (opt-out arm) or an automated telephone call with an option for mammography referral (opt-in arm). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomewas completed mammography 100 days after outreach. Secondary outcomes were scheduled or completed mammography by 100 days after outreach and referrals canceled if mammography was not scheduled within 90 days. Both intention-to-treat analyses and a restricted analysis were conducted. The restricted analysis excluded veterans who were unable to be reached by telephone (eg, a nonworking number) or who were found to be ineligible after randomization (eg, medical record documentation of recent mammography). RESULTS Of 883 veterans due for mammography (mean [SD] age, 59.13 [8.24] years; 656 [74.3%] had received prior mammography), 442 were randomized to the opt-in group and 441 to the opt-out group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant difference in the primary outcome of completed mammography at 100 days between the opt-out and opt-in groups (67 [15.2%] vs 66 [14.9%]; P =.90) or the secondary outcome of completed or scheduled mammography (84 [19%] vs 106 [24.0%]; P =.07). A higher number of referrals were canceled in the opt-out group compared with the opt-in group (104 [23.6%] vs 24 [5.4%]; P <.001). The restricted analysis demonstrated similar results except more veterans completed or scheduled mammography within 100 days in the opt-out group compared with the opt-in group (102 of 388 [26.3%] vs 80 of 415 [19.3%]; P =.02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial, an opt-out population-based breast cancer screening outreach approach compared with an opt-in approach did not result in a significant difference in mammography completion but did lead to substantially more canceled mammography referrals, increasing staff burden.
引用
收藏
页码:1187 / 1194
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Parent perspectives on consent for the linkage of data to evaluate vaccine safety: A randomised trial of opt-in and opt-out consent
    Berry, Jesia G.
    Ryan, Philip
    Duszynski, Katherine M.
    Braunack-Mayer, Annette J.
    Carlson, Jillian
    Xafis, Vicki
    Gold, Michael S.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2013, 10 (03) : 483 - 494
  • [32] Opt-Out Patient Navigation to Improve Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Homeless Women
    Asgary, Ramin
    Naderi, Ramesh
    Wisnivesky, Juan
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2017, 26 (09) : 999 - 1003
  • [33] With Renewed Calls for Presumed Consent, Let's Look at the Donation and Transplant Rates of Opt-In vs Opt-Out Countries
    Mone, Thomas
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 101 : S11 - S11
  • [34] Use of pre-enrollment randomization and delayed consent to maximize participation in a clinical trial of opt-in versus opt-out tobacco treatment
    Faseru, Babalola
    Mussulman, Laura M.
    Nazir, Niaman
    Ellerbeck, Edward F.
    Shergina, Elena
    Scheuermann, Taneisha S.
    Gajewski, Byron J.
    Catley, Delwyn
    Richter, Kimber P.
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2022, 43 (01) : 1035 - 1042
  • [35] Opt-in or opt-out to increase organ donation in South Africa? Appraising proposed strategies using an empirical ethics analysis
    Etheredge, Harriet
    Penn, Claire
    Watermeyer, Jennifer
    DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2018, 18 (02) : 119 - 125
  • [36] Improved antenatal HIV screening coverage with a switch from opt-in to opt-out testing in the northern region of New Zealand
    Mcauliffe, Gary N.
    Forster, Rose
    Voss, Lesley
    Handy, Rupert
    Rajanaidu, Subha
    Kolodziej, Jacek
    Oliphant, Jeannie
    Blakiston, Matt R.
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 137 (1590)
  • [37] Opt-Out and Opt-In Testing Increases Syphilis Screening of HIV-Positive Men Who Have Sex with Men in Australia
    Guy, Rebecca
    El-Hayek, Carol
    Fairley, Christopher K.
    Wand, Handan
    Carr, Andrew
    McNulty, Anna
    Hoy, Jenny
    Bourne, Christopher
    McAllister, John
    Tee, B. K.
    Baker, David
    Roth, Norman
    Stoove, Mark
    Chen, Marcus
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (08):
  • [38] A randomised controlled trial comparing opt-in and opt-out home visits for tracing lost participants in a prospective birth cohort study
    Isabelle Bray
    Sian Noble
    Andy Boyd
    Lindsey Brown
    Pei Hayes
    Joanne Malcolm
    Ross Robinson
    Rachel Williams
    Kirsty Burston
    John Macleod
    Lynn Molloy
    Kate Tilling
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15
  • [39] A randomised controlled trial to compare opt-in and opt-out parental consent for childhood vaccine safety surveillance using data linkage
    Berry, Jesia G.
    Ryan, Philip
    Gold, Michael S.
    Braunack-Mayer, Annette J.
    Duszynski, Katherine M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2012, 38 (10) : 619 - 625
  • [40] A randomised controlled trial comparing opt-in and opt-out home visits for tracing lost participants in a prospective birth cohort study
    Bray, Isabelle
    Noble, Sian
    Boyd, Andy
    Brown, Lindsey
    Hayes, Pei
    Malcolm, Joanne
    Robinson, Ross
    Williams, Rachel
    Burston, Kirsty
    Macleod, John
    Molloy, Lynn
    Tilling, Kate
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2015, 15