Automated Opt-Out vs Opt-In Patient Outreach Strategies for Breast Cancer Screening A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:7
|
作者
Marcotte, Leah M. [1 ,5 ]
Deeds, Stefanie [1 ,2 ]
Wheat, Chelle [3 ]
Gunnink, Eric [3 ]
Gray, Kristen [3 ,4 ]
Rojas, Jorge [3 ]
Finch, Carolyn [2 ]
Nelson, Karin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Reddy, Ashok [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Seattle, WA USA
[2] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle, WA USA
[3] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Ctr Vet Ctr & Value Driven Care, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Syst & Populat Hlth, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.4321
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Optimal strategies for population-based outreach for breast cancer screening remain unknown. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect on breast cancer screening of an opt-out automatic mammography referral strategy compared with an opt-in automated telephone message strategy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This pragmatic randomized clinical trialwas conducted from April 2022 to January 2023 at a single Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. Participants were female veterans aged 45 to 75 years who were eligible for breast cancer screening and enrolled in VA primary care. INTERVENTION Veterans were randomized 1:1 to receive either an automatic mammography referral (opt-out arm) or an automated telephone call with an option for mammography referral (opt-in arm). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomewas completed mammography 100 days after outreach. Secondary outcomes were scheduled or completed mammography by 100 days after outreach and referrals canceled if mammography was not scheduled within 90 days. Both intention-to-treat analyses and a restricted analysis were conducted. The restricted analysis excluded veterans who were unable to be reached by telephone (eg, a nonworking number) or who were found to be ineligible after randomization (eg, medical record documentation of recent mammography). RESULTS Of 883 veterans due for mammography (mean [SD] age, 59.13 [8.24] years; 656 [74.3%] had received prior mammography), 442 were randomized to the opt-in group and 441 to the opt-out group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant difference in the primary outcome of completed mammography at 100 days between the opt-out and opt-in groups (67 [15.2%] vs 66 [14.9%]; P =.90) or the secondary outcome of completed or scheduled mammography (84 [19%] vs 106 [24.0%]; P =.07). A higher number of referrals were canceled in the opt-out group compared with the opt-in group (104 [23.6%] vs 24 [5.4%]; P <.001). The restricted analysis demonstrated similar results except more veterans completed or scheduled mammography within 100 days in the opt-out group compared with the opt-in group (102 of 388 [26.3%] vs 80 of 415 [19.3%]; P =.02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial, an opt-out population-based breast cancer screening outreach approach compared with an opt-in approach did not result in a significant difference in mammography completion but did lead to substantially more canceled mammography referrals, increasing staff burden.
引用
收藏
页码:1187 / 1194
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] INCREASING HIV TESTING AS A PREVENTION STRATEGY: A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF OPT-IN AND OPT-OUT HIV TESTING STRATEGIES AMONG AT-RISK WOMEN
    Chaffin, M.
    Balachova, T.
    Shaboltas, A.
    Bohora, S.
    Batluk, J.
    Bonner, B.
    Skochilov, R.
    Uraeva, G.
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2016, 40 : 60A - 60A
  • [22] HIV Screening in an Urban Emergency Department: Comparison of Screening Using an Opt-In Versus an Opt-Out Approach
    White, Douglas A. E.
    Scribner, Alicia N.
    Vahidnia, Farnaz
    Dideum, Patrick J.
    Gordon, Danielle M.
    Frazee, Bradley W.
    Voetsch, Andrew C.
    Heffelfinger, James D.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 58 (01) : S89 - S95
  • [23] Acceptance Rates of HIV Screening Using Opt-In and Opt-Out Methods In an Urban Emergency Department
    White, D. A.
    Sadoun, T.
    Tran, T.
    Alter, H. J.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 56 (03) : S45 - S45
  • [24] Use of opt-out in a trial of chlamydia screening
    Nathan, Shwetha
    Thacker, Eve
    Oakeshott, Pippa
    Atherton, Helen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2008, 19 (02) : 143 - 144
  • [25] Comparing HIV Case Detection in Prison During Opt-In vs. Opt-Out Testing Policies
    Rosen, David L.
    Wohl, David A.
    Golin, Carol E.
    Rigdon, Joseph
    May, Jeanine
    White, Becky L.
    Leone, Peter A.
    Hudgens, Michael G.
    Bowling, James Michael
    JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2016, 71 (03) : E85 - E88
  • [26] Identifying compliant participants through data matching improved estimation of intervention efficacy: randomized trials with opt-in/opt-out strategies
    Ng, Shu Kay
    Byrnes, Joshua
    Scuffham, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 115 : 125 - 132
  • [27] Uptake of Voluntary Counselling and Testing among Young People Participating in an HIV Prevention Trial: Comparison of Opt-Out and Opt-In Strategies
    Baisley, Kathy
    Doyle, Aoife M.
    Changalucha, John
    Maganja, Kaballa
    Watson-Jones, Deborah
    Hayes, Richard
    Ross, David
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (07):
  • [28] Designing Effective and Appropriate Opt-Out Approaches for Patient Outreach
    Waddell, Kimberly J.
    Mehta, Shivan J.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2023, 183 (11) : 1194 - 1195
  • [29] Rates of acceptance between opt-out vs opt-in smoking cessation referral strategies among current smokers attending a lung health check offering lung cancer screening
    Katsampouris, Evangelos
    Kotti, Theodora
    Ruparel, Mamta
    McEwen, Andy
    Dickson, Jennifer
    Duffy, Stephan
    Waller, Jo
    Janes, Samuel
    Quaife, Samantha
    LUNG CANCER, 2022, 165 : S47 - S48
  • [30] Use of Kiosks and Patient Understanding of Opt-out and Opt-in Consent for Routine Rapid Human Immunodeficiency Virus Screening in the Emergency Department
    Haukoos, Jason S.
    Hopkins, Emily
    Bender, Brooke
    Al-Tayyib, Alia
    Long, Jeremy
    Harvey, Jeffrey
    Irby, Jessica
    Bakes, Katherine
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 19 (03) : 287 - 293