Automated Opt-Out vs Opt-In Patient Outreach Strategies for Breast Cancer Screening A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:7
|
作者
Marcotte, Leah M. [1 ,5 ]
Deeds, Stefanie [1 ,2 ]
Wheat, Chelle [3 ]
Gunnink, Eric [3 ]
Gray, Kristen [3 ,4 ]
Rojas, Jorge [3 ]
Finch, Carolyn [2 ]
Nelson, Karin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Reddy, Ashok [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Seattle, WA USA
[2] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle, WA USA
[3] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Ctr Vet Ctr & Value Driven Care, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Syst & Populat Hlth, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.4321
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Optimal strategies for population-based outreach for breast cancer screening remain unknown. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect on breast cancer screening of an opt-out automatic mammography referral strategy compared with an opt-in automated telephone message strategy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This pragmatic randomized clinical trialwas conducted from April 2022 to January 2023 at a single Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. Participants were female veterans aged 45 to 75 years who were eligible for breast cancer screening and enrolled in VA primary care. INTERVENTION Veterans were randomized 1:1 to receive either an automatic mammography referral (opt-out arm) or an automated telephone call with an option for mammography referral (opt-in arm). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomewas completed mammography 100 days after outreach. Secondary outcomes were scheduled or completed mammography by 100 days after outreach and referrals canceled if mammography was not scheduled within 90 days. Both intention-to-treat analyses and a restricted analysis were conducted. The restricted analysis excluded veterans who were unable to be reached by telephone (eg, a nonworking number) or who were found to be ineligible after randomization (eg, medical record documentation of recent mammography). RESULTS Of 883 veterans due for mammography (mean [SD] age, 59.13 [8.24] years; 656 [74.3%] had received prior mammography), 442 were randomized to the opt-in group and 441 to the opt-out group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant difference in the primary outcome of completed mammography at 100 days between the opt-out and opt-in groups (67 [15.2%] vs 66 [14.9%]; P =.90) or the secondary outcome of completed or scheduled mammography (84 [19%] vs 106 [24.0%]; P =.07). A higher number of referrals were canceled in the opt-out group compared with the opt-in group (104 [23.6%] vs 24 [5.4%]; P <.001). The restricted analysis demonstrated similar results except more veterans completed or scheduled mammography within 100 days in the opt-out group compared with the opt-in group (102 of 388 [26.3%] vs 80 of 415 [19.3%]; P =.02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial, an opt-out population-based breast cancer screening outreach approach compared with an opt-in approach did not result in a significant difference in mammography completion but did lead to substantially more canceled mammography referrals, increasing staff burden.
引用
收藏
页码:1187 / 1194
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OPT-IN VERSUS OPT-OUT COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING OUTREACH: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
    Mehta, Shivan J.
    Khan, Tanya
    Guerra, Carmen E.
    Reitz, Catherine
    McAuliffe, Timothy
    Volpp, Kevin
    Asch, David
    Doubeni, Chyke A.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S768 - S769
  • [2] A Randomized Controlled Trial of Opt-in Versus Opt-Out Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach
    Mehta, Shivan J.
    Khan, Tanya
    Guerra, Carmen
    Reitz, Catherine
    McAuliffe, Timothy
    Volpp, Kevin G.
    Asch, David A.
    Doubeni, Chyke A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 (12): : 1848 - 1854
  • [3] Patient choice in opt-in, active choice, and opt-out HIV screening: randomized clinical trial
    Montoy, Juan Carlos C.
    Dow, William H.
    Kaplan, Beth C.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 352
  • [4] Opt-In versus Opt-out HIV Screening in Emergency Departments: A Randomized Trial
    Montoy, J. C.
    Chan, G. K.
    Mahadevan, S., V
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 60 (04) : S103 - S103
  • [5] The Effects of Opt-out vs Opt-in Tobacco Treatment on Engagement, Cessation, and Costs A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Richter, Kimber P. P.
    Catley, Delwyn
    Gajewski, Byron J. J.
    Faseru, Babalola
    Shireman, Theresa I. I.
    Zhang, Chuanwu
    Scheuermann, Taneisha S. S.
    Mussulman, Laura M. M.
    Nazir, Niaman
    Hutcheson, Tresza
    Shergina, Elena
    Ellerbeck, Edward F. F.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2023, 183 (04) : 331 - 339
  • [6] Opt-in/"Opt-out" Strategies and Their Implications on JHA Communitarisation
    Mihai, Adina Mihaela
    EUROPOLITY-CONTINUITY AND CHANGE IN EUROPEAN GOVERNANCE, 2009, 3 (04): : 35 - 40
  • [7] Text Messaging and Opt-out Mailed Outreach in Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Huf, Sarah W.
    Asch, David A.
    Volpp, Kevin G.
    Reitz, Catherine
    Mehta, Shivan J.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (07) : 1958 - 1964
  • [8] In women aged 45 to 75 y, opt-out vs. opt-in breast cancer screening outreach did not increase mammography rates
    Tanner, Michael
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 177 (02) : JC20 - JC20
  • [9] EFFECTIVENESS OF OPT-IN VERSUS OPT-OUT TEXT MESSAGE-BASED OUTREACH FOR COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING
    Zhou, Sara
    Yu, Nancy
    Gregory, Blake
    Rafferty, Henry
    Nguyen, Antony
    Stern, Rachel J.
    Somsouk, Ma
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 162 (07) : S43 - S43
  • [10] Text Messaging and Opt-out Mailed Outreach in Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Sarah W. Huf
    David A. Asch
    Kevin G. Volpp
    Catherine Reitz
    Shivan J. Mehta
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2021, 36 : 1958 - 1964