Student evaluation of teaching: gender bias in a country at the forefront of gender equality

被引:12
|
作者
Sigudardottir, Margret Sigrun [1 ]
Rafnsdottir, Gudbjorg Linda [2 ]
Jonsdottir, Anna Helga [3 ]
Kristofersson, Dadi Mar [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iceland, Fac Business Adm, Reykjavik, Iceland
[2] Univ Iceland, Fac Social & Human Sci, Reykjavik, Iceland
[3] Univ Iceland, Fac Phys Sci, Reykjavik, Iceland
[4] Univ Iceland, Fac Econ, Reykjavik, Iceland
关键词
Higher education; student evaluations of teaching (SET); gender bias; gender equality; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1080/07294360.2022.2087604
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research on gender equality in Higher Education indicates that female academics might not have the same opportunities for promotion as male academics. One of the are as in Higher Education where gender bias has been reported is in Student Evaluations of Teaching (SET). The aim of this article is to analyse possible gendered characteristics of communication between students and teachers in higher education, as reflected in SET. The article builds on mixed-method research. Five years of SET responses were analysed quantitatively and one year of open answers was analysed qualitatively. The qualitative data was then coded quantitatively. Iceland offers an excellent case for this study as it has been a forerunner in gender equality for years. The quantitative analysis shows that male students rate female teachers lower than their male counterparts, and the qualitative analyses indicate that the evaluation pattern of male and female teachers differs. Additionally, differences were found in the comments received by the teachers. Comments on male teachers referred to subject knowledge, while female teachers received comments on their service to students and relatability. There thus seems to be a gender bias in SET in Iceland despite its reputation for gender equality.
引用
收藏
页码:954 / 967
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gender bias in teaching evaluations: the causal role of department gender composition
    Aragon, Oriana R.
    Pietri, Evava S.
    Powell, Brian A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2023, 120 (04)
  • [42] Student evaluations of team members: Is there gender bias?
    Main, Joyce B.
    Sanchez-Pena, Matilde
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2015, 2015, : 945 - 950
  • [43] A re-evaluation of gender bias in receptiveness to scientific evidence of gender bias
    Shanks, David R.
    Coles, Hollie A.
    Yeo, Nadia
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2024, 11 (09):
  • [44] Gender and gender role differences in student-teachers' commitment to teaching
    Moses, Ikupa
    Admiraal, Wilfried F.
    Berry, Amanda K.
    SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2016, 19 (03) : 475 - 492
  • [45] Gender equality and legislative evaluation of gender-based laws in Korea
    Choi, Kyungho
    THEORY AND PRACTICE OF LEGISLATION, 2021, 9 (01): : 25 - 34
  • [46] Does gender equality bridge or buffer the entrepreneurship gender gap? A cross-country investigation
    Vracheva, Veselina
    Stoyneva, Irina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL BEHAVIOR & RESEARCH, 2020, 26 (08): : 1827 - 1844
  • [47] Gender equality and health equity: strategic lessons from country experiences of gender mainstreaming in health
    Gonzalez Velez, Ana Cristina
    Coates, Anna
    Diaz Garcia, Victoria
    Wolfenzon, Denisse
    REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 44
  • [48] A statutory requirement: Teaching innovation for gender equality at university
    Torrico, Maria Garcia-Cano
    Hinojosa-Pareja, Eva F.
    Buenestado-Fernandez, Mariana
    Jimenez-Millan, Azahara
    WOMENS STUDIES INTERNATIONAL FORUM, 2023, 96
  • [49] Teaching Equality? "John Schools," Gender, and Institutional Reform
    Majic, Samantha
    POLITY, 2014, 46 (01) : 5 - 30
  • [50] Teaching staff and their perception about gender equality at university
    Ion, Georgeta
    del Mar Duran-Bellonch, Maria
    Bernabeu Tamayo, Maria Dolors
    REVISTA COMPLUTENSE DE EDUCACION, 2013, 24 (01): : 123 - 140