Student evaluation of teaching: gender bias in a country at the forefront of gender equality

被引:12
|
作者
Sigudardottir, Margret Sigrun [1 ]
Rafnsdottir, Gudbjorg Linda [2 ]
Jonsdottir, Anna Helga [3 ]
Kristofersson, Dadi Mar [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iceland, Fac Business Adm, Reykjavik, Iceland
[2] Univ Iceland, Fac Social & Human Sci, Reykjavik, Iceland
[3] Univ Iceland, Fac Phys Sci, Reykjavik, Iceland
[4] Univ Iceland, Fac Econ, Reykjavik, Iceland
关键词
Higher education; student evaluations of teaching (SET); gender bias; gender equality; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1080/07294360.2022.2087604
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research on gender equality in Higher Education indicates that female academics might not have the same opportunities for promotion as male academics. One of the are as in Higher Education where gender bias has been reported is in Student Evaluations of Teaching (SET). The aim of this article is to analyse possible gendered characteristics of communication between students and teachers in higher education, as reflected in SET. The article builds on mixed-method research. Five years of SET responses were analysed quantitatively and one year of open answers was analysed qualitatively. The qualitative data was then coded quantitatively. Iceland offers an excellent case for this study as it has been a forerunner in gender equality for years. The quantitative analysis shows that male students rate female teachers lower than their male counterparts, and the qualitative analyses indicate that the evaluation pattern of male and female teachers differs. Additionally, differences were found in the comments received by the teachers. Comments on male teachers referred to subject knowledge, while female teachers received comments on their service to students and relatability. There thus seems to be a gender bias in SET in Iceland despite its reputation for gender equality.
引用
收藏
页码:954 / 967
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Student Evaluation of Faculty Physicians: Gender Differences in Teaching Evaluations
    Morgan, Helen K.
    Purkiss, Joel A.
    Porter, Annie C.
    Lypson, Monica L.
    Santen, Sally A.
    Christner, Jennifer G.
    Grum, Cyril M.
    Hammoud, Maya M.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2016, 25 (05) : 453 - 456
  • [33] Moral commitment to gender equality increases (mis)perceptions of gender bias in hiring
    Xiao, Hualin
    Marie, Antoine
    Strickland, Brent
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 54 (06) : 1211 - 1227
  • [34] Gender balance/gender bias: the teaching profession and the impact of feminisation
    Drudy, Sheelagh
    GENDER AND EDUCATION, 2008, 20 (04) : 309 - 323
  • [35] Gender and gender role differences in student–teachers’ commitment to teaching
    Ikupa Moses
    Wilfried F. Admiraal
    Amanda K. Berry
    Social Psychology of Education, 2016, 19 : 475 - 492
  • [36] The invisible obstacle to educational equality: Gender bias in textbooks
    Blumberg R.L.
    PROSPECTS, 2008, 38 (3) : 345 - 361
  • [37] Gender Stereotypes in Student Evaluations of Teaching
    Renstrom, Emma A.
    Senden, Marie Gustafsson
    Lindqvist, Anna
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2021, 5
  • [38] Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching
    Boring, Anne
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2017, 145 : 27 - 41
  • [39] Gender balance in teaching debate: tensions between gender theory and equality policy
    Riddell, Sheila
    Tett, Lyn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION, 2010, 14 (05) : 463 - 477
  • [40] Gender Bias in Evaluation Processes
    Arceo-Gomez, Eva O.
    Campos-Vazquez, Raymundo M.
    ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2022, 89