Quantitative Estimation of Rainfall from Remote Sensing Data Using Machine Learning Regression Models

被引:2
|
作者
Mohia, Yacine [1 ]
Absi, Rafik [2 ]
Lazri, Mourad [1 ]
Labadi, Karim [2 ]
Ouallouche, Fethi [1 ]
Ameur, Soltane [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mouloud MAMMERI Tizi Ouzou UMMTO, Fac Genie Elect & Informat FGEI, Loboratoire Anal & Modelisat Phenomenes Aleatoires, LAMPA, Tizi Ouzou 15000, Algeria
[2] ECAM EPMI, LR2E Lab, Lab Quartz, F-95092 Cergy Pontoise, France
关键词
remote sensing; rainfall; MSG Satellite; SVR; RF; RR; regression; SATELLITE; CLASSIFICATION; NORTH; AREAS;
D O I
10.3390/hydrology10020052
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
To estimate rainfall from remote sensing data, three machine learning-based regression models, K-Nearest Neighbors Regression (K-NNR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Random Forest Regression (RFR), were implemented using MSG (Meteosat Second Generation) satellite data. Daytime and nighttime data from a rain gauge are used for model training and validation. To optimize the results, the outputs of the three models are combined using the weighted average. The combination of the three models (hereafter called Com-RSK) markedly improved the predictions. Indeed, the MAE, MBE, RMSE and correlation coefficient went from 23.6 mm, 10.0 mm, 40.6 mm and 89% for the SVR to 20.7 mm, 5.5 mm, 37.4 mm, and 94% when the models were combined, respectively. The Com-RSK is also compared to a few methods using the classification in the estimation, such as the ECST Enhanced Convective Stratiform Technique (ECST), the MMultic technique, and the Convective/Stratiform Rain Area Delineation Technique (CS-RADT). The Com-RSK show superior performance compared to ECST, MMultic and CS-RADT methods.The Com-RSK is also compared to the two products of satellite estimates, namely CMORPH and CHIRPS. The results indicate that Com-RSK performs better than CMORPH and CHIRPS according to MBE, RMSE and CC (coefficient correlation). A comparison with three types of satellite precipitation estimation products, such as global product, regional product, and near real-time product, is performed. Overall, the methodology developed here shows almost the same results as regional product methods and exhibits better results than near real-time and global product methods.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modeling Managed Grassland Biomass Estimation by Using Multitemporal Remote Sensing Data-A Machine Learning Approach
    Ali, Iftikhar
    Cawkwell, Fiona
    Dwyer, Edward
    Green, Stuart
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 10 (07) : 3254 - 3264
  • [32] Estimation of Rainfall using Remote Sensing for Riyadh Climate, KSA
    AlHassoun, Saleh A.
    NUCLEATION AND ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS, 2013, 1527 : 786 - 789
  • [33] Estimation of biomass in wheat using random forest regression algorithm and remote sensing data
    Li'ai Wang
    Xudong Zhou
    Xinkai Zhu
    Zhaodi Dong
    Wenshan Guo
    TheCropJournal, 2016, 4 (03) : 212 - 219
  • [34] Estimation of biomass in wheat using random forest regression algorithm and remote sensing data
    Wang, Li'ai
    Zhou, Xudong
    Zhu, Xinkai
    Dong, Zhaodi
    Guo, Wenshan
    CROP JOURNAL, 2016, 4 (03): : 212 - 219
  • [35] Statistical and Machine Learning Models for Remote Sensing Data Mining-Recent Advancements
    Das, Monidipa
    Ghosh, Soumya K.
    Chowdary, Vemuri M.
    Mitra, Pabitra
    Rijal, Santosh
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [36] Mapping of soil organic carbon using machine learning models: Combination of optical and radar remote sensing data
    Zhou, Yang
    Zhao, Xiaomin
    Guo, Xi
    Li, Yi
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2022, 86 (02) : 293 - 310
  • [37] Field-Scale Estimation and Comparison of the Sugarcane Yield from Remote Sensing Data: A Machine Learning Approach
    K. Krupavathi
    M. Raghubabu
    A. Mani
    P. R. K. Parasad
    L. Edukondalu
    Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2022, 50 : 299 - 312
  • [38] Field-Scale Estimation and Comparison of the Sugarcane Yield from Remote Sensing Data: A Machine Learning Approach
    Krupavathi, K.
    Raghubabu, M.
    Mani, A.
    Parasad, P. R. K.
    Edukondalu, L.
    JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 50 (02) : 299 - 312
  • [39] Application of Dempster-Shafer theory for optimization of precipitation classification and estimation results from remote sensing data using machine learning
    Belmahdi, Fatiha
    Lazri, Mourad
    Ouallouche, Fethi
    Labadi, Karim
    Absi, Rafik
    Ameur, Soltane
    REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS-SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 29
  • [40] An Unsupervised Machine Learning Approach in Remote Sensing Data
    Mazzei, Mauro
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2019, PT III: 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, SAINT PETERSBURG, RUSSIA, JULY 1-4, 2019, PROCEEDINGS, PART III, 2019, 11621 : 435 - 447