Mapping of soil organic carbon using machine learning models: Combination of optical and radar remote sensing data

被引:19
|
作者
Zhou, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Xiaomin [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Xi [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Agr Univ, Acad Land Resource & Environm, Nanchang 330045, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Key Lab Poyang Lake Watershed Agr Resources & Eco, Nanchang 330045, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; RANDOM FOREST MODELS; TOTAL NITROGEN; SPATIAL PREDICTION; TERRAIN INDEXES; REGIONAL-SCALE; EASTERN CHINA; MATTER; STOCKS; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1002/saj2.20371
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soil organic C (SOC) plays an important role in soil quality. Thus, it is of great significance to know the spatial distribution characteristics of SOC. Environmental variables, such as natural predictors, remote sensing (RS) variables, and digital soil mapping approaches have been widely used in SOC prediction. However, it is still challenging to determine which methods and variables are effective to map SOC in farmland. In this study, we compare the performance of three machine learning models, including random forest, Cubist, and the support vector machine model for the prediction of SOC contents using RS variables, topographic variables, climate variables, soil property variables, and spatial position variables as environmental covariates. The recursive feature elimination (RFE) technique was used to select optimal variables. Of the 130 sampling sites of the cultivated layer that were collected in Shanggao county, 70% of the data were used for training and 30% for validation. Prediction accuracy and uncertainty was quantified using the bootstrap approach with 100 iterations. The performance of the model was verified by the mean absolute error, RMSE, R-2, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC); the SD was used as a measure of prediction uncertainty. Results showed that the Cubist model combined with the RFE method (Cubist_RFE) had a mean R-2, RMSE, and SD of .84, 2.39 g kg(-1), and 0.73 g kg(-1), respectively, which showed the highest prediction accuracy and the lowest uncertainty. The soil property variables (soil alkaline hydrolysis N and pH) and RS variables (soil adjusted vegetation index, enhanced vegetation index, and band7 of Sentinel-2) were the controlling factors of SOC prediction. Thus, the results indicate the potential of the Cubist model in SOC prediction, and the combination of the optical and radar RS data is a viable way for predicting SOC.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 310
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Soil organic carbon estimation using remote sensing data-driven machine learning
    Chen, Qi
    Wang, Yiting
    Zhu, Xicun
    [J]. PEERJ, 2024, 12
  • [2] Combination of Radar and Optical Remote Sensing Data For Land Cover/Use Mapping
    Keat, Sim Chong
    Abdullah, Khiruddin
    Jafri, Mohd Zubir Mat
    San, Lim Hwee
    [J]. 2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SPACE SCIENCE AND COMMUNICATION (ICONSPACE), 2013, : 224 - 227
  • [3] Digital mapping of soil organic carbon using remote sensing data: A systematic review
    Pouladi, Nastaran
    Gholizadeh, Asa
    Khosravi, Vahid
    Boruvka, Lubos
    [J]. CATENA, 2023, 232
  • [4] Hazelnut mapping detection system using optical and radar remote sensing: Benchmarking machine learning algorithms
    Sasso, Daniele
    Lodato, Francesco
    Sabatini, Anna
    Pennazza, Giorgio
    Vollero, Luca
    Santonico, Marco
    Merone, Mario
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN AGRICULTURE, 2024, 12 : 97 - 108
  • [5] Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Remote Sensing Data
    Hussain, Muhammad Afaq
    Chen, Zhanlong
    Zheng, Ying
    Zhou, Yulong
    Daud, Hamza
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (19)
  • [6] Mapping soil organic carbon in Tuscany through the statistical combination of ground observations with ancillary and remote sensing data
    Gardin, Lorenzo
    Chiesi, Marta
    Fibbi, Luca
    Maselli, Fabio
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2021, 404
  • [7] Remote Sensing for Soil Organic Carbon Mapping and Monitoring
    van Wesemael, Bas
    Chabrillat, Sabine
    Dias, Adrian Sanz
    Berger, Michael
    Szantoi, Zoltan
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (14)
  • [8] Open Remote Sensing Data in Digital Soil Organic Carbon Mapping: A Review
    Radocaj, Dorijan
    Gasparovic, Mateo
    Jurisic, Mladen
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (07):
  • [9] ESTIMATING SOIL MOISTURE USING OPTICAL AND RADAR SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING DATA
    Natali, Stefano
    Pellegrini, Loreto
    Rossi, Gianluigi
    Giordano, Ludovica
    Iannetta, Massimo
    Schino, Gabriele
    Marini, Alberto
    Nabil, Gasmi
    [J]. DESERTIFICATION AND RISK ANALYSIS USING HIGH AND MEDIUM RESOLUTION SATELLITE DATA, 2009, : 105 - +
  • [10] Mapping and prediction of soil organic carbon by an advanced geostatistical technique using remote sensing and terrain data
    Mallik, Santanu
    Bhowmik, Tridip
    Mishra, Umesh
    Paul, Niladri
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (08) : 2198 - 2214